If the disk is full and you try to install anything with urpmi,
it goes into an infinite loop.
Liam Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [root@blacksock tmp]# rpmdrake
> examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.update_source.cz]
> examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz]
> examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.pudue-http-rpms.cz]
[root@blacksock tmp]# rpmdrake
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.update_source.cz]
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz]
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.pudue-http-rpms.cz]
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthe
Es schrieb François Pons:
>
> Thomas Rösch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After every installation, urpmi makes a core dump, but the installation
> > works fine. I work under KDE.
>
> You are sure urpmi core dumped ? its look like a grpmi or rpmdrake cores ?
Sorry, it's grpmi:
file core.204
Thomas Rösch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
Hello,
> After every installation, urpmi makes a core dump, but the installation
> works fine. I work under KDE.
You are sure urpmi core dumped ? its look like a grpmi or rpmdrake cores ?
According to following :
> gdb /usr/bin/perl core.19285
huug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will do. urpmi-3.9.8 is working fine though.
I added a fix supposing it was the problem of modified flag being read, so it is
ok (it is absurd to read modified flag, so I removed it).
François.
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just having a discussion on urpmi sources in the IRC channel. I was
> wondering...is there any benefit to allowing different urpmi sources to
> have different locations and names for their hdlists? If not, could the
> name and location of the hdlist n
Just having a discussion on urpmi sources in the IRC channel. I was
wondering...is there any benefit to allowing different urpmi sources to
have different locations and names for their hdlists? If not, could the
name and location of the hdlist not be standardised, which would then
mean the user do
(wolf@mirage 18:11:16):
/home/mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS sudo urpmi --update
unable to retrieve pathname for removable medium "disc 1 MandrakeLinux Cooker
(cdrom1)"
unable to retrieve pathname for removable medium "disc 2 MandrakeLinux Cooker
(cdrom2)"
unable to retrieve pathname for remo
huug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And now it doesn't select any of the 29 rpmdrake "by update
> availability" finds.
Problem fixed in perl-URPM-0.60-8mdk, sorry...
François.
huug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) urpmi.update works too hard
>
> There's no ".no" in update_source:
>
>
> # urpmi.update --wget .no
> selecting multiple media: "uninett.no", "contrib.no"
Evrything seems clean here ?
> # urpmi --auto-select
> alles is al geïnstalleerd
> # urpmi perl-MDK
I is not a full uprmi failure, but also a bad upload:
On mirror version of bash is 2.05a, as me, you probably have bash 2.05b !
I have report to fpons this problem.
Le Mardi 30 Juillet 2002 11:50, Marcelo Gigirey a écrit :
> [root@servidor root]# urpmi --wget bash
> The following packages have
Olivier Thauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I to report two problems:
>
> 1) ###
> Thierry: your changelog is bad: two version of -2mdk, then on mirror, it
> 2.05a, but on my system I have 2.05b installed, please, can you fix. This
> cause an urpmi error. (see bellow) .
>
>
Olivier Thauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I is not a full uprmi failure, but also a bad upload:
> On mirror version of bash is 2.05a, as me, you probably have bash 2.05b !
>
> I have report to fpons this problem.
this not a urpmi bug; we've reverted to bash-2.05a due to
control-leftarrow mak
Olivier Thauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I is not a full uprmi failure, but also a bad upload:
> On mirror version of bash is 2.05a, as me, you probably have bash 2.05b !
it's just that we have reverted back to 2.05a since 2.05b has too
many problems.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://peo
[root@servidor root]# urpmi --wget bash
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
MySQL-3.23.51-2mdk
MySQL-client-3.23.51-2mdk
PHP-nuke-5.6-1mdk
SysVinit-2.83-3mdk
basesystem-8.2-3mdk
bash-2.05b-3mdk
bash-doc-2.05b-3mdk
cracklib-dicts-2.7-15mdk
cyrus-sasl-1.5.27-3mdk
dev
I to report two problems:
1) ###
Thierry: your changelog is bad: two version of -2mdk, then on mirror, it
2.05a, but on my system I have 2.05b installed, please, can you fix. This
cause an urpmi error. (see bellow) .
* Fri Jul 26 2002 Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.05
"Liam R. E. Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > Beside its destination for end-users which can't use a terminal, sorting and
> > searching easily is certainly the most useful feature in rpmdrake.
>
> I could give up sorting by source if I can see separate lists of
> packages by source
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 08:01, Philippe Coulonges wrote:
> Le Mercredi 03 Juillet 2002 13:18, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
> > New rpmdrake will change a lot, will be more easy, but the
> > drawback is that some existing features will disappear, such as
> > sorting by source and size.
>
> Argghh
Salane King wrote:
>caution a nasty hack for you to temporarially get around this problem.
>This should be fixed though.
>edit /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm
>comment out line 84 with a # save and urpmi.update
>
>On Wednesday 24 July 2002 06:51 pm, nDiScReEt wrote:
>
caution a nasty hack for you to temporarially get around this problem.
This should be fixed though.
edit /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm
comment out line 84 with a # save and urpmi.update
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 06:51 pm, nDiScReEt wrote:
> su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.upd
Rene Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I dont remember that i had a crash or a corupt rpm db.
> Maybe this error was from on pakage from cooker, because there is
> another one with the same Problem.
It could be the case if you have a separate /usr and don't format it during
install (when /
Hello!
I dont remember that i had a crash or a corupt rpm db.
Maybe this error was from on pakage from cooker, because there is
another one with the same Problem.
find /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/ -type f -exec rpm -qf {} \; | wc
-l
157
After deleting /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/ its
Fabrice Boyrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> urpmi usermode
> The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> harddrake-1.1.8-10mdk
> usermode-consoleonly-1.44-6mdk
> userdrake-0.5-1mdk
> [...]
> dynamic-0.5-3mdk
> do you agree ? (O/n)
I made a mistake on determining the
Rene Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [root@desktop root]# urpmi.update
> Can't locate Locale/GetText.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
I had urpmi-3.9-2mdk
[root@desktop root]# rpm -Uvh urpmi-3.9-4mdk.noarch.rpm
perl-URPM-0.50-5mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:perl-URPM ###
[ 50%]
2:urpmi #
Rene Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have updated all perl Packages but that does not change anything.
what gives rpm -V urpmi
If you do not have 3.9-4mdk please upgrade.
François.
I have a probleme with urpmi since a few days.
rpm -qa urpmi perl-URPM:
perl-URPM-0.50-5mdk
urpmi-3.9-4mdk
An example:
urpmi usermode
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
harddrake-1.1.8-10mdk
usermode-consoleonly-1.44-6mdk
userdrake-0.5-1mdk
[...]
dynamic-0
I have updated all perl Packages but that does not change anything.
[root@desktop root]# urpmi.update
Can't locate Locale/GetText.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0
/usr/lib/perl5
Rene Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
Hello,
> [root@desktop root]# rpm -ivh perl-gettext-1.0-7mdk.i586.rpm
> Fehler: fehlgeschlagene Paket-Abhängigkeiten:
> perl-base >= 5.600-29mdk wird von perl-gettext-1.0-7mdk
> gebraucht
You need to update a lot of perl packages to be
Hello!
[root@desktop root]# rpm -ivh perl-gettext-1.0-7mdk.i586.rpm
Fehler: fehlgeschlagene Paket-Abhängigkeiten:
perl-base >= 5.600-29mdk wird von perl-gettext-1.0-7mdk
gebraucht
[root@desktop root]# rpm -q perl-base
perl-base-5.8.0-2mdk
[root@desktop root]# rpm -qa | grep perl-
perl-PDL
Hello,
After upgrading to a fresh cooker, I get a perl error while
trying to update the list of available packages :
# urpmi.update cooker
Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
Compilation failed in requ
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 20:35, Quel Qun wrote:
> $ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi.update cooker
> Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
> Compilation failed in require at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.p
su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.update -a --wget"
Password:
Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line
765.
rpm -qa | grep urpmi
gurpmi-3
$ rpm -qa | grep -i urpm
urpmi-3.9-3mdk
perl-URPM-0.50-4mdk
$ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi.update cooker
Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.
I don't see this reported on the mail list yet, but this is what I get
after upgrading this morning.
[root@tp mts-client-0.9.6b]# urpmi.update cooker2
Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
Compilation faile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can this error message more usefull and beautifull ?
There is a way to not emacs conflict with xemacs ?
Thanks a lot.
removing 0 obsolete headers in cache
write config file [/etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg]
installing
/home/root/mandrake/mdk/Mandrake-devel/c
Have the same problem here. Unless urpmi can be fixed, i'm totally screwed.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:35 AM
Subject: [Cooker] urpmi missing Perlmodul
> Hello!
>
> After upgrading P
> The latest urpmi 3.9 does not solve this Problem.
> I cant find the rpm that hold Locale/GetText.pm, can some please give me a
> hint?
>
> thank you
> Rene
What is the list of your perl packages?
rpm -qa | grep perl
Make sure all those are current.
--
-
> The latest urpmi 3.9 does not solve this Problem.
> I cant find the rpm that hold Locale/GetText.pm, can some please give me a
hint?
[book@~ 10:00:29 (3)]# urpmf GetText.pm
perl-gettext:/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Locale/GetText.pm
---
Zdenek Mazanec, Contactel s.r.o.
http://mand
Hello!
After upgrading Packages (inc. urpmi 3.8) i cant use urpmi.
I remember that the depences want deinstall one rpm and i selected yes.
Looks like it was wrong.
Urpmi gives this error:
[root@desktop root]# urpmi.update
Can't locate Locale/GetText.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.
Hi!
Since some versions of urpmi, it does no longer resolve all deps when
updating packages:
root@nibbler ~ # urpmi harddrakeTo satisfy dependencies...:
drakxtools-newt-1.1.8-10mdk.i586
harddrake-1.1.8-10mdk.i586
Installation failed:
drakxtools-newt == 1.1.8-8mdk is needed by drakxt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> unable to uncompress synthesis file at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line
>545.
> unable to uncompress synthesis file at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line
>1112
> unable to uncompress synthesis file at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm l
This is all using the latest urpmi and gurpmi:
rpm -qa|grep urpmi
gurpmi-3.7-5mdk
urpmi-3.7-5mdk
On 16 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Error #1 During an "--auto-select" option
>
> su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select" unable
> to uncompress synthesis file at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_
Error #1 During an "--auto-select" option
su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select"
unable to uncompress synthesis file at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line
545.
>>>
Error #2 Due to no connection to remote server>
su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.up
Hello,
urpmi --proxy does not like my proxy syntax...
# urpmi -v --proxy 'http://127.0.0.1:3128/' ldconfig
Died at /usr/sbin/urpmi line 115.
# rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM
urpmi-3.7-4mdk
perl-URPM-0.10-1mdk
# rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM perl-base
urpmi-3.7-4mdk
perl-URPM-0.10-1mdk
perl-base-5.8.0-0.17412
On Monday 15 July 2002 3:23 am, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:08:27AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> > Yes if you'd looked at the archives. And it's fixed in urpmi-3.7-3mdk
> > which came out on Friday.
>
> errr that should be 4mdk.
That fixed my problem but now I don't get that nice
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:08:27AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> Yes if you'd looked at the archives. And it's fixed in urpmi-3.7-3mdk
> which came out on Friday.
errr that should be 4mdk.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
We tend to see all wars through the lens of the curren
I did an
urpmi.update -a
followed by
urpmi --auto-select
This upgraded perl to perl-5.8.0-0.17412.5mdk.
and other repective packages rpmi-3.7-3mdk and
gurpmi-3.7-3mdk. I no longer have the use of Software Manager or urpmi from
the command line.
I get the following output when I issue the c
Patch attached that fixes the urpmi problem that causes this error
message to be emitted:
[root@occipital breser]# urpmi.update -a
Can't use string ("") as a subroutine ref while "strict refs" in use at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line 934.
The problem is Perl 5.8.0 was optimizing ou
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened to give a listing of the rpms which caused the failure?
it's temporary while fpons is doing heavy modifications all over
the place. it will re-appear soon.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
>> >From where should i get "smtpdaemon"?
>
> [will@bastard will]$ urpmf --provides smtpdaemon
> ssmtp:provides:smtpdaemon
> postfix:provides:smtpdaemon
> sendmail:provides:smtpdaemon
Well this one will not work in my case:
sh% ls /var/lib/urpmi
hdlist.plf.cz
list.cooker-contrib
list.plf
list.co
Le mar 09/07/2002 à 23:57, Yura Gusev a écrit :
> François Pons said:
> > Maks Orlovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Tuesday 09 July 2002 03:26 am, Yura Gusev wrote:
> >> > LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
> >> > One of the following packages is needed:
> >> > 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
> >>
François Pons said:
> Maks Orlovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Tuesday 09 July 2002 03:26 am, Yura Gusev wrote:
>> > LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
>> > One of the following packages is needed:
>> > 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
>> > 2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
>> > 3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i5
FACORAT Fabrice said:
> Le mar 09/07/2002 à 11:14, Yura Gusev a écrit :
>
>> >> I want to force installation because i have qmail installed.
>> >
>> > What the problems, it sounds like a choice asked, nothing to do with
>> > force ?
>>
>> Well i thought that urpmi works like rpm with --force param
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened to give a listing of the rpms which caused the failure?
run it directly through rpm the files from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms
ie something like rpm -Uvh /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/*.rpm
Maks Orlovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 09 July 2002 03:26 am, Yura Gusev wrote:
> > LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
> > One of the following packages is needed:
> > 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
> > 2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
> > 3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i586
> >
> >
> > I want to forc
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 03:26 am, Yura Gusev wrote:
> LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
> One of the following packages is needed:
> 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
> 2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
> 3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i586
>
>
> I want to force installation because i have qmail installed.
Why not just
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 09:14, Yura Gusev wrote:
> Well i thought that urpmi works like rpm with --force parameter and i want
> it to work this way.
> --force- force invocation even if some packages do not exist.
> P.S This feature is usefull only on Cooker but normal users who use CD
> ver
Le mar 09/07/2002 à 11:14, Yura Gusev a écrit :
> >> I want to force installation because i have qmail installed.
> >
> > What the problems, it sounds like a choice asked, nothing to do with
> > force ?
>
> Well i thought that urpmi works like rpm with --force parameter and i want
> it to work t
François Pons said:
> "Yura Gusev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
>> One of the following packages is needed:
>> 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
>> 2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
>> 3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i586
>>
>>
>> I want to force installation because i have qmail inst
"Yura Gusev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
> One of the following packages is needed:
> 1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
> 2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
> 3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i586
>
>
> I want to force installation because i have qmail installed.
What the problems, it
LC_ALL=C urpmi --force mutt
One of the following packages is needed:
1- sendmail-8.12.1-6mdk.i586
2- ssmtp-2.50.3-3mdk.i586
3- postfix-1.1.10-2mdk.i586
I want to force installation because i have qmail installed.
Philippe Coulonges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Mercredi 03 Juillet 2002 13:18, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
> >
> > New rpmdrake will change a lot, will be more easy, but the
> > drawback is that some existing features will disappear, such as
> > sorting by source and size.
>
> Argghh !
>
pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have kernel-enterprise installed, is it normal that urpmi --auto-select
> proposes that I install kernel (at the same level) ?
please retry with --bug on the urpmi command line.
François.
I have kernel-enterprise installed, is it normal that urpmi --auto-select
proposes that I install kernel (at the same level) ?
Pascal
# rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-source-2.4.18-20mdk
kernel-headers-2.4.18-32mdk
kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.20mdk-1-1mdk
kernel-doc-2.4.18-20mdk
# urpmi --auto-select
Pou
Le Mercredi 03 Juillet 2002 13:18, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
>
> New rpmdrake will change a lot, will be more easy, but the
> drawback is that some existing features will disappear, such as
> sorting by source and size.
Argghh !
Is it temporary ? Is it for performance reasons ?
Beside its de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> "Liam R. E. Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > in Software manager, can we have sorting by version?
> >
> > This sounds silly, but if there are a lot of packages released together
> > (e.g. the gcc 3.x stuff) it's useful to select them all, even
"Liam R. E. Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in Software manager, can we have sorting by version?
>
> This sounds silly, but if there are a lot of packages released together
> (e.g. the gcc 3.x stuff) it's useful to select them all, even if they
> don't depend on each other. Since it can alr
pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hem... how do I specify that ldconfig is spelled 'ldconfig' now ??!? :)))
Ok, reproducable here, I try to fix.
in Software manager, can we have sorting by version?
This sounds silly, but if there are a lot of packages released together
(e.g. the gcc 3.x stuff) it's useful to select them all, even if they
don't depend on each other. Since it can already sort by source and
size, seems like it'd be easy.
L
hem... how do I specify that ldconfig is spelled 'ldconfig' now ??!? :)))
Pascal
# urpmi ldconfig
The following packages contain ldconfig: apache2-mod_perl ldconfig
# rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM rpm
urpmi-3.6-5mdk
perl-URPM-0.05-2mdk
rpm-4.0.4-6mdk
# rpm -q ldconfig
ldconfig-2.2.5-1mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I install ispell, urpmi want one of language for ispell. I am OK for
that. I choose ispell-fr and urpmi install ispell and ispell-fr.
Two minutes after, I want update cooker, I do urpmi --auto-select.
Why it want install ispell-en ? It was not
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 2) Listing all available uninstalled packages
> >
> > simple scripting
>
> Yes, and here follows the script (francois, maybe this could go
> into a special mode of urpmq, if it doesn't alrea
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1) Getting the list of available updates
>
> urpmf --name
Hum. Dunno if urpmf/urpmq does the job, but the following script
does:
-=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=--
use urpm;
use URPM;
$urpm = new urpm;
$urpm->configure();
$db = U
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2) Listing all available uninstalled packages
>
> simple scripting
Yes, and here follows the script (francois, maybe this could go
into a special mode of urpmq, if it doesn't already exist?).
-=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=--
use urpm;
use UR
>
> I much prefer using urpmi on the command line to the graphical
interface,
> especially as i am trying to keep my cooker up to date as much as
possible,
I do not understand word "especially" in this context
> but there are a few things i cant do that i would like to be able to
and i
> hope s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I much prefer using urpmi on the command line to the graphical interface,
especially as i am trying to keep my cooker up to date as much as possible,
but there are a few things i cant do that i would like to be able to and i
hope someone here can h
Hi.
[root@alex root]# urpmi /dl/Mandrake/staroffice-de-5.2-8mdk.i586.rpm
Um die Abhängigkeiten zu erfüllen, werden die folgenden Pakete installiert (109 MB):
eel-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 gnome-media-2.0.0-2mdk.i586 kdebase-3.0.1-15mdk.i586
libnautilus2-2.0.0-2mdk.i586 gail-0.16-1mdk.i586 libgnome-vfs2_
Hello,
# urpmi --update
Can't call method "filename" on an undefined value at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/urpm.pm line 1726.
?
I realize from the manpage that it's only half of the command line it expects,
however, it should tell it me nicely, not with PERL error message :)
# rpm -qa | gr
[root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi -h
urpmi version
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 MandrakeSoft.
This is free software and may be redistributed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
...
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
[root@bononcini guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être installés
(7 Mo):
kernel22-2.2.20-9mdk.i586
openssh-askpass-3.2.2p1-1mdk.i586
Est-ce correct ? (O/n)
Neither or those package are currently installed, and as this bost has not
been
Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 14:34, Brad Felmey wrote:
>
> > # urpmi --autoselect
> > ]# urpmi --auto-select
>
> Grrr, this was a cut-n-paste error.
>
> # urpmi --auto-select
>
> was the correct one, of course.
No problem, fix is urpmi-3.5-3mdk.
François.
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 14:34, Brad Felmey wrote:
> # urpmi --autoselect
> ]# urpmi --auto-select
Grrr, this was a cut-n-paste error.
# urpmi --auto-select
was the correct one, of course.
--
Brad Felmey
# rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM
urpmi-3.5-2mdk
perl-URPM-0.04-3mdk
# urpmi --autoselect
]# urpmi --auto-select
One of the following packages is needed:
1- docbook-dtd31-sgml-1.0-6mdk.noarch
2- docbook-dtd30-sgml-1.0-1mdk.noarch
3- docbook-dtd41-sgml-1.0-6mdk.noarch
What is your choice? (1-3) 3
To sa
Output below shows error. I can manually urpmi linc and then evolution,
but that kinda defeats the whole idea of urpmi. ;-)
This is on a full cooker with urpmi 3.4-9 (3.5 hasn't shown on sunet
yet).
# urpmi evolution
> One of the following packages is needed:
> 1- aspell-br-0.2.1-7mdk.i586
>
Attached file shows error. I can manually urpmi linc and then evolution,
but that kinda defeats the whole idea of urpmi. ;-)
This is on a full cooker with urpmi 3.4-9 (3.5 hasn't shown on sunet
yet).
--
Brad Felmey
One of the following packages is needed:
1- aspell-br-0.2.1-7mdk.i586
2- aspe
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what is really needed is intelligent cache management. Then you would
> not even notice such problem. Just restart installation using different
> source and it continues from where it stopped before. Dreams dreams :)
Some dreams can become true worl
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new display of packages going to be installed line by line is fine, and
> make easier to track what is going to change. However, sortig this list would
> make it better again :-)
This sounds good and reasonable ;-)
François.
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:55:38 +0400
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > You can't have both. You can't (always) install them in alphabetical
> > order without breaking dependencies. And urpmi can't check _all_
> > dependencies so there is no guarantee that installation won
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:55:38 +0400
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can't have both. You can't (always) install them in alphabetical
> order without breaking dependencies. And urpmi can't check _all_
> dependencies so there is no guarantee that installation won't fail.
Yo
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:32:14 +0200
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The new display of packages going to be installed line by line is
> > fine, and make easier to track what is going to change. However,
> > sortig this list would make it better again :-)
>
> And even nicer s
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:32:14 +0200
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new display of packages going to be installed line by line is
> fine, and make easier to track what is going to change. However,
> sortig this list would make it better again :-)
And even nicer still would then
The new display of packages going to be installed line by line is fine, and
make easier to track what is going to change. However, sortig this list would
make it better again :-)
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
last line of strace urpmi --auto-select:
stat64("/usr/sbin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0751, st_size=6504, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
stat64("/bin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0751, st_size=2248, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL,
# urpmi kdevelop
[...]
error: failed dependencies:
kdbg is needed by kdevelop-2.1.1-5mdk
# rpm -qa kdbg
kdbg-1.2.5-1mdk
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried to forget in so many ways...
And I have only myself to blame
Linux 2.4.18-16mdk
12:01pm up 7 days, 2
Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey folks,
>
> After the latest update, urpmi ignores my skip list.
>
> $ rpm -q urpmi
> urpmi-3.4-7mdk
> $ cat /etc/urpmi/skip.list
> # Here you specify the package you don't want to install
> dev
> MAKEDEV
> $ urpmi --auto-select
> To satisfy de
Hey folks,
After the latest update, urpmi ignores my skip list.
$ rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-3.4-7mdk
$ cat /etc/urpmi/skip.list
# Here you specify the package you don't want to install
dev
MAKEDEV
$ urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (0 MB):
d
Le Jeudi 6 Juin 2002 17:49, François Pons a écrit :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Can you send me synthesis file on this topic ?
> >
> > http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/synthesis.hdlist.contrib.cz
> > http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/synthesis.hdlist.cooker.cz
> > http://
Fabrice MARIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> urpmi crash with a perl error :
>
> # rpm -q urpmi; urpmi --update
> urpmi-3.4-5mdk
> opening read only rpm db 0x82498a0
> Can't call method "id" on an undefined value at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/urpm.pm line 1470.
> closing rpm db 0x82498a0
>
601 - 700 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
