RE: DrakX and Installer and initscripts Re: [Cooker] bad initscripts? (can't log in)

2001-02-19 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > > On 02.19 Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > > > > > > This is a feature, not a bug. > > > > It is a bug not a feature. See threads "[Cooker] can't login to runlevel 3 > > ...please help" and my earlier post (link in the above thread). > The problem > > is, new initscripts (ifup) changed semantic of D

RE: DrakX and Installer and initscripts Re: [Cooker] bad initscripts? (can't log in)

2001-02-19 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 02.19 Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > > > > This is a feature, not a bug. > > It is a bug not a feature. See threads "[Cooker] can't login to runlevel 3 > ...please help" and my earlier post (link in the above thread). The problem > is, new initscripts (ifup) changed semantic of DOMAINNAME so now s

RE: DrakX and Installer and initscripts Re: [Cooker] bad initscripts? (can't log in)

2001-02-18 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > This is a feature, not a bug. It is a bug not a feature. See threads "[Cooker] can't login to runlevel 3 ...please help" and my earlier post (link in the above thread). The problem is, new initscripts (ifup) changed semantic of DOMAINNAME so now system assumes it runs NIS if DOMAINNAME is set

DrakX and Installer and initscripts Re: [Cooker] bad initscripts? (can't log in)

2001-02-18 Thread Prana
This is a feature, not a bug. The best thing is, probably, (a note to initscripts and DrakX developer), if security level = 4 (High) or 5 (Above), give a note that they won't be able to log in to console. Also in the installer, I believe that if security level = 4, local user creation for at least