> I noticed this myself actually. When I did the first rsync download
to
> an empty directory, I got the rpms and not RPMS as one would expect.
> I am downloading to a FAT32 mounted partition - this may have
something
^ do not do this! It is not a file system
:-)
> to
I noticed this myself actually. When I did the first rsync download to
an empty directory, I got the rpms and not RPMS as one would expect.
I am downloading to a FAT32 mounted partition - this may have something
to do with it . . . not case sensitive I guess.
here is the mount table and path as
>
> Strange.
>
> I have tried the --delete option with not so nice results. Every time
I
> update the tree with rsync (and previously with wget) I end up
> eventually with lots of older (outdated) files.
>
> I tried the following line which basically blew away many "good" files
> (not just old
Strange.
I have tried the --delete option with not so nice results. Every time I
update the tree with rsync (and previously with wget) I end up
eventually with lots of older (outdated) files.
I tried the following line which basically blew away many "good" files
(not just older files!):
rsync
So sprach »Randy Kramer« am 2001-08-27 um 17:39:51 -0400 :
> instead of one. Sometimes it needs one colon, sometimes it needs two,
> there is a logical reason but I don't remember what it is (has to do
> with protocols used) -- I always seem to need two.
because with this syntax, you need two.
So sprach »Lonnie Borntreger« am 2001-08-27 um 15:59:13 -0500 :
> sunsite.uio.no:/linux/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 \
sunsite.uio.no::
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.
Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
>
> This thread has been interesting. I've been mirroring using the
> following command:
>
> mirrordir -v \
> ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 \
> /home/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586
>
> I'd like to try rsync, since I'm thinking that it would be mo
On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 16:47, Sergio Korlowsky wrote:
> First... do not use -z all files are already compressed... most sites
> recomend to turn this off, as it is cpu intensive.
>
> secondly not need to set the complete path use the module instead...
> rsync -av (no z) -n (as this is your firs
On Monday 27 August 2001 03:59 pm, you wrote:
> This thread has been interesting. I've been mirroring using the
> following command:
>
> mirrordir -v \
> ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 \
> /home/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586
>
> I'd like to try rsync, since I'm thinking tha
Lonnie,
Until someone who know what they're doing responds, try two colons (::)
instead of one. Sometimes it needs one colon, sometimes it needs two,
there is a logical reason but I don't remember what it is (has to do
with protocols used) -- I always seem to need two.
hth,
Randy Kramer
Lonni
This thread has been interesting. I've been mirroring using the
following command:
mirrordir -v \
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 \
/home/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586
I'd like to try rsync, since I'm thinking that it would be more
bandwidth efficient. So far no luck. He
On Monday 27 August 2001 08:59 am, you wrote:
> > > For me, wget -m keeps the file dates, even under w2k...
> >
> > Across time zones? Good news if so.
>
> For ftp transfers? Impossible. HTTP sends time in GMT so it is no
> problem. FTP has no notion of local time, so it is impossible by
> defin
guran wrote:
>
> rsync has the following option that was originally asked for:
>
> --size-only
> Normally rsync will skip any files that are already
> the same length and have the same time-stamp. With
> the --size-only option files will be skipped
Hi
rsync has the following option that was originally asked for:
--size-only
Normally rsync will skip any files that are already
the same length and have the same time-stamp. With
the --size-only option files will be skipped if
they h
>
> > For me, wget -m keeps the file dates, even under w2k...
>
> Across time zones? Good news if so.
>
For ftp transfers? Impossible. HTTP sends time in GMT so it is no
problem. FTP has no notion of local time, so it is impossible by
definition (some clients allow you to configure offset on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For me, wget -m keeps the file dates, even under w2k...
Across time zones? Good news if so.
--
Ron. [au]
> No, it will download it all again, because wget is a defective
> downloader in that it does not preserve file dates - rsync therefore
> determines the server file to be a new version.
Never speak so quick : wget is somewhat old, so there is much chances you
are "the defect"!
For me, wget -m k
"R.I.P. Deaddog" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> > No, it will download it all again, because wget is a defective
> > downloader in that it does not preserve file dates - rsync therefore
> > determines the server file to be a new version.
>
> To preserve file dates in wge
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ron Stodden wrote:
> No, it will download it all again, because wget is a defective
> downloader in that it does not preserve file dates - rsync therefore
> determines the server file to be a new version.
To preserve file dates in wget, I think -m option may do it, but not s
yOn 26 Aug 2001, Robert Fox wrote:
> I appreciate the feedback so far - there appears to be several tools to
> use (wget,rsync,fmirror,mirror,lftp,etc.)
>
> It's a tad confusing trying to figure out the ideal tool, let alone the
> correct syntax and parms to use.
>
rsync is better in my experien
I appreciate the feedback so far - there appears to be several tools to
use (wget,rsync,fmirror,mirror,lftp,etc.)
It's a tad confusing trying to figure out the ideal tool, let alone the
correct syntax and parms to use.
Can I rsync on top of the wget tree I downloaded?
Thanks again.
RF
On 26 A
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Robert Fox wrote:
> >
> > I have been using "wget -rm" to fetch the Cooker tree - but if I do it often
>enough, I end up with a bunch of older files on the downloaded branch
> > (because the older version is not removed)
> >
> > Is rsync or mirror better
Robert Fox wrote:
>
> I have been using "wget -rm" to fetch the Cooker tree - but if I do it often enough,
>I end up with a bunch of older files on the downloaded branch
> (because the older version is not removed)
>
> Is rsync or mirror better? If so, what is the recommended download syntax f
23 matches
Mail list logo
