>
> It is planned to switch to /var/lib/gnome (or something like that,
like
> Debian) when I'll add Mandrake menu support to GNOME 2 (you shouldn't
have
> to wait for too long for that..)
>
Good. What about KDE (off head it is mandrake menu + kdmrc that is
rewritten on every boot).
-andrej
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:24:42 +0200, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I was doing a system update today. That system has /usr mounted
> read-only from the server. This concept in general does not work
> terribly well with Mandrake Linux, but with menu it is a disaster.
>
> That is because the menu dat
> On Tuesday 18 June 2002 22:21, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > Can you mount /usr as ro and /usr/share (or as far down the
/usr/share
> > > path you list as you feel necessary) as rw?
> >
> > You must be able to mount /usr ro. Period. /usr/share is for system
> > independent _non-volatile_ data. /
On Tuesday 18 June 2002 22:21, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > Can you mount /usr as ro and /usr/share (or as far down the /usr/share
> > path you list as you feel necessary) as rw?
>
> You must be able to mount /usr ro. Period. /usr/share is for system
> independent _non-volatile_ data. /var is for v
> Can you mount /usr as ro and /usr/share (or as far down the /usr/share
> path you list as you feel necessary) as rw?
You must be able to mount /usr ro. Period. /usr/share is for system
independent _non-volatile_ data. /var is for volatile data. You may even
think about /var/share - but mostly
Can you mount /usr as ro and /usr/share (or as far down the /usr/share
path you list as you feel necessary) as rw? I would assume that entails
two exports entries as opposed to the current one for all of /usr.
Seems like that shouldn't be a real problem since you want update-menus
to work and
