Re: [Cooker] Re: 7.1 beta - kdf missing --- AGAIN! - Bad, bad, bad, slapped wrist.

2000-05-25 Thread Ron Stodden
OS wrote: > > All the best developers say with the upmost certainty that there is no bug > because it cannot be reproduced on their system. Surely it is not correct to > say that a situation is 'disproved' simply because you cannot reproduce this > problem on your machine. If this is your code (I

Re: [Cooker] Re: 7.1 beta - kdf missing --- AGAIN! - Bad, bad, bad, slapped wrist.

2000-05-25 Thread OS
> As I informed you when you made this claim before, neither of these > situations occurs here. I am surprised that once disproved you would > persist with them? All the best developers say with the upmost certainty that there is no bug because it cannot be reproduced on their system. Surely it

Re: [Cooker] Re: 7.1 beta - kdf missing --- AGAIN!

2000-05-25 Thread Ron Stodden
Civileme wrote: > Unfortunately, kdiskfree seems to be seriously bugged. I like it and use it in > 6.1 but on partitions of 6 G or so I am always shown 1.86G. Another problem is > accurately representing nfs mounts I am not among those who believe a > broken tool is better than no tool at

Re: [Cooker] Re: 7.1 beta - kdf missing --- AGAIN!

2000-05-24 Thread Civileme
On Tue, 23 May 2000, you wrote: > Here is a repeat of mine of April 28, the first of 6 messages in > Cooker on this subject. > > There has been no response from MandrakeSoft. > > This really MUST be in beta3! IMHO, of course . > > Could somebody seriously look into why this package continues