On Wednesday 12 November 2003 8:49 pm, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that
Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=m in test9.5mdk, but, as Andrey
pointed out, ide chipsets won't even load in current 2.6 state.
I do not remember having said that :) I said that modular IDE
is known to not work - but the only proof of that statement
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:02 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not remember having said that :) I said that modular IDE
is known to not work - but the only proof of that statement I have
seen is post-halloween document.
I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Morton
I do not remember having said that :) I said that modular IDE
is known to not work - but the only proof of that statement I have
seen is post-halloween document.
I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Morton IIRC, I'll check it and
give a more detailed answer at lunch.
ok, I
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:19:03 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Morton IIRC, I'll check it
and give a more detailed answer at lunch.
ok, I would bei interested. I still like the idea of delayed
initialization and loading IDE out
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:02 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=m in test9.5mdk, but, as Andrey
pointed out, ide chipsets won't even load in current 2.6 state.
I do not remember having said that
A patch has been sent, but Alan waits the IDE code to be stable enough.
he retired from active work for a year now so it is unlikely it
is going to be fixed (by him) any time soon.
But this problem can be avoided if we keep IDE support
built-in (CONFIG_IDE=y, CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y).
So
Quoting Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
Scott Chevalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
the exact name of your IDE chipset).
Thanks.
here ya go.
Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 10:18 pm, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
Scott Chevalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
the exact name of your IDE chipset).
Thanks.
here ya go.
Ok, you're using a
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
rebuilt the
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:13 am, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
rebuilt
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:49:01 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very short note (will come back later with longer one :) )
wanna include some 3rdparty stuff ?-)
Why not :)
That won't kill me or significantly increase the built time.
i'm trying to ?port? the mdk
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:49:01 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very short note (will come back later with longer one :) )
wanna include some 3rdparty stuff ?-)
Why not :)
That won't kill me or significantly increase the built time.
greate :-)
i'm trying to
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
rebuilt the
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:27:47 -0500
Scott Chevalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried the test9.5 kernel and during the fsck stage it keeps
saying that DMA is turned off on the hard drive. I checked with
hdparm and it is off and it gives a SIOC error when I try to enable
it.
I tried
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:34, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:27:47 -0500
Scott Chevalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried the test9.5 kernel and during the fsck stage it keeps
saying that DMA is turned off on the hard drive. I checked with
hdparm and it is off and it
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
Scott Chevalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
the exact name of your IDE chipset).
Thanks.
here ya go.
Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=m in
18 matches
Mail list logo
