[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10
What is this bug number and why isn't the standard reply-to on this email ?
Did you make the email by hand ?
I was trying to get multiple local X servers/users
( see http://startx.times.lv/ )
but the mandrake X server
Pascal Terjan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to get multiple local X servers/users
( see http://startx.times.lv/ )
but the mandrake X server simply doesn't want to run in parallel. :(
Sorry I had'nt read the page and what you want to do is special...
Le Thursday 13 March 2003 16:50, Götz Waschk a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 12. März 2003, 19:48:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Laurent MONTEL:
--=-=-=
Name: mdkkdm Relocations: (not
relocateable) Version : 9.1 Vendor:
MandrakeSoft Release
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 09:28:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Laurent Montel:
Le Thursday 13 March 2003 16:50, Götz Waschk a écrit :
relocateable) Version : 9.1 Vendor:
MandrakeSoft Release : 25mdk Build Date: Wed
I couldn't find this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Brickey wrote:
I don't know what is going on. I moved the Samba WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg
file over to Windows XP Pro, but decided to try accessing the Mandrake
directory shared by Samba once more before applying it. Apparently the
threat of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
discsFiles: 4
MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 apcupsd-3.10.5-1mdk.i586
Uh oh, that's an important package!!!
I would agree, probably many production servers have the related
hardware attached ...
- --
|--Another
On 13 Mar 2003, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 15:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 19:56, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
[snip]
If you're going to expect the Bushes to know about Spanish and Russian
politics, maybe you should learn to spell George Bush?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
obennett wrote:
just installed the new menu package (provides the icons i was missing)
and my
new ... ah, look at the screenie. you'll see :)
I am zen
http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/obennett/zen.jpg
But the question that arises is, should we add a
Le Friday 14 March 2003 09:34, Götz Waschk a écrit :
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 09:28:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Laurent Montel:
Le Thursday 13 March 2003 16:50, Götz Waschk a écrit :
relocateable) Version : 9.1 Vendor:
MandrakeSoft Release : 25mdk
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 11:18:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne:
new ... ah, look at the screenie. you'll see :)
I am zen
http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/obennett/zen.jpg
But the question that arises is, should we add a slicker package to
contrib?
I didn't find it *that* useful (took up too
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 10:20:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Götz Waschk:
that's no reason why we wouldn't need a package of this app. Maybe the
person who posted the sceenshot could contribute one?
I just noticed that slicker seems to be in an early development stage,
so maybe we should wait for a
Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 05:36, El Gringo ( aka Quel Qun ) a écrit :
MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-en-9.1-2mdk.noarch
MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-es-9.1-2mdk.noarch
MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-fr-9.1-2mdk.noarch
What about
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, waschk wrote:
Yes. On my other 9.1 system (a PIII), the test succeded, so it's related to the
Celeron processor.
I don't think gdb is ever target cpu dependent. ;-) Probably a kernel
problem?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 10:20:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Götz Waschk:
that's no reason why we wouldn't need a package of this app. Maybe the
person who posted the sceenshot could contribute one?
I just noticed that slicker seems to
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 10:30:04 Uhr MET, schrieb Gwenole Beauchesne:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, waschk wrote:
Yes. On my other 9.1 system (a PIII), the test succeded, so it's
related to the Celeron processor.
I don't think gdb is ever target cpu dependent. ;-) Probably a kernel
problem?
On Friday 14 March 2003 4:48 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 10:20:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Götz Waschk:
that's no reason why we wouldn't need a package of this app. Maybe the
person who posted the sceenshot could contribute one?
I just noticed that
Would it be possible to have a -dpi added to the server line(s) in
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers, that matches the Xft.dpi setting from
/etc/X11/Xresources
--
John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MandrakeClub Silver Member.
Hi.
This is a kind of report on my experiences with:
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030313 19:48
Nice installer, could not figure out how to enter the expert mode with
hd.img (?). Some splash ad png files were missing.
After 3-4 re-installs I ended up with ext3 fs corruption each time. The last
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
discsFiles: 4
MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 apcupsd-3.10.5-1mdk.i586
Uh oh, that's an important package!!!
I would agree, probably many production servers have the related
hardware attached ...
As well as many
Whoa cool, how did you get the taskbar to look like that (the one at the
top)?
obennett wrote:
just installed the new menu package (provides the icons i was missing) and my
new ... ah, look at the screenie. you'll see :)
I am zen
http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/obennett/zen.jpg
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are correct... however If I use the packages from 9.0 ... I get the
battery working. with the ones from cooker I get 0:00 on the taskbar.
All other files packages remain the same... I just rpm -Uvh icewm and
icewm-light of the correct version.
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's a local exploit. I can think of a few other local ``exploits'' as
well, like booting in single user mode.
this is not a exploit if you can _boot_ in single user mode it's
mean you have acess to the hardware and if you have access we cannot
do
thomas == Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thomas This is a the mdk standard kernel linux-2.4.21-0.13mdk + my changes:
thomas http://www.iki.fi/tmb/Cooker/linux-2.4.21-0.13mdk-TmB.tar.bz2
thomas Just unzip/untar it to / and run the included Install, and reboot...
thomas Here is the
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Well..., back to using 9.0 and my cooker formatted ext3 home partition
could not be fsck:ed because of some new unrecognised ext3 parameters.
[...]
I've seen the same with 9.1RC2. In order to boot Mandrake 8.2, I had to
disable the ext3 partition (/boot). The other
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 12:17:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Per Øyvind Karlsen:
- added libfam-devel to buildrequires (why do I find it hard to believe that we
need all those buildrequires already there..?;)
I'm no kde guy, but to me it looks like kdelibs-devel and
libarts-devel are missing some
On Thursday 13 March 2003 23:53, John Keller wrote:
Crispin Boylan wrote:
hi
the build in cooker is 0.2mdk - this is not an RPM of the final mozilla
1.3 but one of the candidate builds isnt it?
Cheers
cris.
Oops. I think you're right. I had seen the appearance of a few 1.3final
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a local exploit. I can think of a few other local
``exploits'' as well, like booting in single user mode.
this is not a exploit if you can _boot_ in single user mode it's
mean you have acess to the
Is there a reason for not making the shared library libgs.so?
The libgs.so is required for the gsview program.
Vennlig Hilsen
Torstein Hernes Dybdahl
---
Haldensgate 21
7014 Trondheim
NORWAY
Stud. Tech. ved Elektroteknikk og
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 13:10:43 Uhr MET, schrieb Torstein Hernes Dybdahl:
Is there a reason for not making the shared library libgs.so?
The libgs.so is required for the gsview program.
AFAIK gsview is shareware, why should anyone want that program?
--
Götz Waschk master of computer
Gsview is covered by the Aladdin Free Public Licence prohibiting
commercial distribution.
But the real question is if it is possible to make the libgs.so file. If
so how do i proceede with the rpm source?
the reason for testing is the possibility in the future for text selection
in ps and pdf
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 03:08, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are correct... however If I use the packages from 9.0 ... I get the
battery working. with the ones from cooker I get 0:00 on the taskbar.
All other files packages remain the same... I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
Whoa cool, how did you get the taskbar to look like that (the one at the
top)?
It isn't the taskbar, it's slicker (and so are the other little tabs
he's got around the edge of the screen).
Buchan
- --
|--Another
Hi,
I'm very sorry to say but I'm not sure the problem is lilo.
1) we know the hardware is unreliable
2) you reported also severe ext3 corruptions - very unusual,
and at large it happens when one has hardware problems
What you experience I'm afraid is the effect that the hardware run
On Friday 14 March 2003 04:45 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
Whoa cool, how did you get the taskbar to look like that (the one at the
top)?
It isn't the taskbar, it's slicker (and so are the other little tabs
he's got around the
On Friday 14 March 2003 6:58 am, Han Boetes wrote:
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a local exploit. I can think of a few other local
``exploits'' as well, like booting in single user mode.
this is not a exploit if you can
On Friday 14 March 2003 03:47 am, Gollum wrote:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Well..., back to using 9.0 and my cooker formatted ext3 home partition
could not be fsck:ed because of some new unrecognised ext3 parameters.
[...]
I've seen the same with 9.1RC2. In order to boot Mandrake 8.2, I had to
On Friday 14 March 2003 09:23 am, jokerman64 wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 6:58 am, Han Boetes wrote:
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a local exploit. I can think of a few other local
``exploits'' as well, like booting in single
Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That was a simple suggestion, it seemed important to me, that's
all. Is security concerning only security experts ? I don't
think so. Where is the problem to be a customer asking questions
about security yo the expert precisly ?! If you can justify the
choice
Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on critical apps, on drakconf tools ecc. or not ? Perhaps this
would avoid big holes like the shutdown one, no ?
The shutdown problem is not a big hole. It grants local root
access only for people with a login on the physical machine
(console login). Securing
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3308
Product: drakxtools
Component: DrakConnect
Summary: US Robotics MOD-7900 NIC support
Version: 9.1-22mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
RC2 cd when inserted in cd drive in winodws machine starts a window that
identifies itself as Mandrake 9.0 which should be 9.1.
parag
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 09:03 ---
Could you please check if the new version 0.9.19 fixes this? You can get the
xine-ui package from the plf server.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
Am Freitag, 14. März 2003, 20:21:12 Uhr MET, schrieb parag shah:
RC2 cd when inserted in cd drive in winodws machine starts a window that
identifies itself as Mandrake 9.0 which should be 9.1.
This was already fixed.
--
Götz Waschk master of computer science University of Rostock
On Friday 14 March 2003 06:45 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on critical apps, on drakconf tools ecc. or not ? Perhaps this
would avoid big holes like the shutdown one, no ?
The shutdown problem is not a big hole. It grants local root
access only for people
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 09:08 ---
This exact problem happens for me, but when I select foomatic.
During install, Go to individual package selection, expand the tree, and click
on 'foomatic'.
A box
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3272
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 09:22 ---
No, metaballs doesn't use GL. I also have the binary drivers from nvidia, but no
coredumps at all. I must say that I've upgraded my private version of
xscreensaver to
jokerman64 wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 6:58 am, Han Boetes wrote:
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a local exploit. I can think of a few other local
``exploits'' as well, like booting in single user mode.
this is
Florin wrote:
my mistake ... I've uploaded in the main distro ... but now it's back in
contribs ... and available in the mirrors soon enough ...
I've checked the specfile for 5mdk in cvs (btw, isn't there in contribs
cvs, it's still in main cvs) and I don't think removing the Provides:
imap is
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 11:17, Danny Tholen wrote:
[Contrib-RPM]
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-multimedia-2.4.21.0.16mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Mar 14
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 14:39, Jason Straight wrote:
I disagree, i don't think that if you go into single user mode that you
should be root. You should still have to log in. The argument that someone
has physical access to your computer thus making it your problem and not an
exploit is IMHO
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 09:37 ---
Still valid, now assigned to fontconfig (?)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
[Contrib-RPM]
--=-=-=
Name: kvircRelocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 3.0.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 0.beta1.5mdk Build Date: Fri Mar 14 15:31:24 2003
Install date: (not
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
On Friday 14 March 2003 10:11 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
Not entirely. You also have to lock your case shut somehow to stop
someone opening it up and flicking the BIOS reset...
Anyway, in regards to the original bug, this isn't purely a local
exploit, surely? Doesn't it also apply to someone
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3105
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 09:49 ---
Still valid.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fontconfig |program
Product|fontconfig
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3289
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:02 ---
You also have to remove SOURCE 2010 because there are no lnx21notes.txt for the
Matrox drivers.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3309
Product: urpmi
Component: urpmi
Summary: mozilla
Version: 4.2-33mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3136
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:07 ---
and how can I check?!?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3289
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:08 ---
This enhancement is posted for the latest XFree86 package as you can see in the
version field.
The problem you have solved is reported in bug 3288.
--- You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:10 ---
I submited some bugs on Mdk9.1rc1 (2010 2011 2013 2017).
Some were fixed on Mdk9.1rc2, and I noticed then on buzilla (2010 2011
2013).
But bug #2017 seems to be still
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3289
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:16 ---
An apparte, just for the record: the binary drivers for xfree 4.2.1 and g550, from
the
matrox site, work fine on top of the current xfree86 4.3 cooker. You just
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3289
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:23 ---
well in my spec it was deleted long before the update to mgadrivers-2.1-src,
so i didn't included it the proposed patch :)
if there is no such file lnx21notes.txt, may
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:43 ---
Sorry for that.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3292
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Component|mozilla
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2762
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:50 ---
Is still bugged, nmap cause service to hang, executing a ping to another
network address report there's no buffer space available, after hangs.
Salvatore Cabiddu
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3149
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3094
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 10:59 ---
Both bounding boxes are still there (0.2-18) :(
Alastair
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3241
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2896
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Important Keyboard Problem |Important Keyboard Problem
---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libsasl2-plug-ntlm |adduserdrake
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3215
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 11:12 ---
The described bug is still in version 9.1.22.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3310
Product: kernel
Component: kernel
Summary: Philips Toucam Pro 740 Webcam doesn't work
Version: 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 11:14 ---
Hello this problem causes from your xkb/symbols/xx file [xx means your language
name e.i. fr for french tr for turkish ]
Please try to change another language file
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, in regards to the original bug, this isn't purely a local
exploit, surely? Doesn't it also apply to someone ssh'ing in from a
remote site? i.e., I could give a simple user account to someone in
Australia, thinking it's safe, and they could
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
Product: kernel
Component: kernel
Summary: the system reboots withour any reason, P4S8X, nvidia
ti4200
Version: 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2637
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 11:27 ---
Sorry, but read this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/usr/bin/crontab -u mail -r
You (mail) are not allowed to use this program (/usr/bin/crontab)
See crontab(1) for more
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 11:30 ---
That's not a module parameter, it's a kernel parameter.
Needs to be in the append= line in /etc/lilo.conf (and run lilo after editing).
--- You are receiving
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
On Friday 14 March 2003 09:32 am, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On the other hand the thing that gets me is cdrom/dvdrom I've seen quite a
few times these devices when they are going bad. Durring install they well
get all kinds of lost interupt errors on screen 4 you will be able to
easily see this.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
Hi ppl !
I wanna ask - there will be reiserfs quota support in new MDK 9.1
release kernel ?
WBR, maxx
Ainsi parlait Gwenole Beauchesne :
And I am sure env|grep LC_, outputs some locales besides fr-FR, isn't it?
OOo always user-installs according to system locale unless told otherwise.
Try to ooffice --lang fr, or first rm -rf ~/.openoffice.
You're right, my locales are all en_US, while my
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 11:56 ---
the new version did not change anything.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3313
Product: mozilla
Component: program
Summary: mozilla and Open Link in New Window
Version: 1.3-0.2mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3312
Product: mdkonline
Component: program
Summary: Network doesn't work
Version: 0.91-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3313
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi
I noticed this since about a week now in the latest cookers. Kmail is using
the sans font for the folder list ad the message list but it shows a
different mostly unreadable font for the preview pane.
So I went to the kmail settings and under the Appearance icon I checked Use
custom fonts.
On Friday 14 March 2003 07:56 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 09:32 am, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On the other hand the thing that gets me is cdrom/dvdrom I've seen quite
a few times these devices when they are going bad. Durring install they
well get all kinds of lost interupt
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2915
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
On Fri Mar 14 9:23 -0500, jokerman64 wrote:
I disagree, i don't think that if you go into single user mode that you should
be root. You should still have to log in. The argument that someone has
physical access to your computer thus making it your problem and not an
exploit is IMHO
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
I have found a bug that I choose the language Chinese(Simp.) at
installing time,and after I have finished installing progress and reboot
the computer,MDK displays starting information like this: ALSA
?? ??[??](it should be Starting ALSA 0.90 rc6 [ OK
]).Every time I start up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brook Humphrey wrote:
Sorry I have sent this to the list twice now with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
his simply disappeared while my other emails have gone to the list. So I
have cc'd it to Buchan also and since then i have added notes to the
bottom.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=142
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
