Hello,
I am not 100 % sure, but as far as i know the 3C920 is a modified 3C905, the 3C920
seems to be mainly used as onboard-device on mobo's, so it could be possible that the
3c905 module works, at least in Windows you can get the 3c920 to work with the 3c905
drivers, at work we have some HP
David Walser wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would just make sure you:
1) Don't have any IP set as a GATEWAY
2) are only running the dhcp server on the ethernet interface
Thanks
I haven't followed the discussion from the beginning, but here is my
contribution to the discussion...
I have Asus NForce2 motherboard which comes with 3c920 (Tornado) chipset
and it works just fine. (Uptodate cooker is detecting it in the harddrake
and uses 3c905 module for drivers...)
Mika
lavaeolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The screen-resolution cannot be changed in the Mandrake
control-center, on RC2 I could change it at least by using XFDrake,
but in cooker it won't do anything, normally I don't change
resolution on my OB, because lower resolution on a 1400 x 1050
Hi,
have been looking at 3Com; the 3c920 is basically the same controller-chip as on the
3c905 Series NICs, it is for use as onboard-device on mobo's and in Notebooks, I have
this chip as onboard-NIC on my ASUS A7N8x and the Windows-Drivers that came with it
where 3c905.
@mika:
nice to hear,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3511
Product: ggv
Component: ggv
Summary: Reason why ggv does display content.
Version: 1.99.98-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
On Friday 21 March 2003 23:27, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
If not the iso images, why not repair the buggy cooker that avoid the
creation of runing isos?
I don't know what problems people have been having making .iso's but I have
been making DVD sized .iso's for absolutely ages; made on
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell
Eric Fernandez wrote:
David Walser wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would just make sure you:
1) Don't have any IP set as a GATEWAY
2) are only running the dhcp server on the ethernet
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if those problems are related?
no.
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 10.57 skrev Marcel Pol:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 09:39 ---
I am seeing the same problem with 9.1RC2.
Also, when I install the kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1, I have the same problem on MDK 9.0
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Product: drakxtools
Component: drakxtools
Summary: Exporting to NFS or Samba window is missing ?
Version: 9.1-26mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 09:48 ---
I tried to upgrade XFree86 in a SuSE Linux Office Desktop 8.1 installation from
version 4.2.x to 4.3 - and experiencing some similar (even worse - KDE shows up
with a
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3513
Product: ggv
Component: program
Summary: ggv taking the long route to viewing pdfs
Version: 1.99.98-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3501
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever Confirmed|
Le dim 23/03/2003 à 05:14, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Overall, I can broadly say...it worked. Good marks for that :). But,
there were some gotchas along the way. First of all there was rather an
annoying problem with openSSL. When I just did an --auto-select, it
failed due to missing
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3514
Product: mdkkdm
Component: libsasl2-plug-ntlm
Summary: missing ')' in french version
Version: 9.1-24mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
- Original Message -
From: David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: [Cooker] Re: problem for resolving domain names after connecting a
LAN
I hope you had interfaces in all caps.
embarrassed eee... I'll try it again
Eric Fernandez wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: [Cooker] Re: problem for resolving domain names after connecting a
LAN
I hope you had interfaces in all caps.
embarrassed eee...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 March 2003 07:16, Quel Qun wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 21:49, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
1. Does this happen automatically, or does the executable require code
to look there?
Yes, based on what the kernel says to glibc.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2813
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 11:15 ---
K3b, the burning software included with kde seems to have the same problem. When
I tried it with supermount it didn't work, without supermount it worked just fine.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
--- Additional Comments
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 03:00, Lenny Cartier posted as excerpted below:
[Contrib-RPM]
--=-=-=
Name: dirmngr Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 0.4.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 06:05, Quel Qun wrote:
I also had a glibc install related problem. I updated a machine by hand,
starting with the openssh and kernel rpms. Following the dependencies, I
ended up having to update glibc.
The problem is I could not use rpm anymore after that (I haven't
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3415
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 11:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=389)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=389action=view)
fix #3415
do not add non embeddable program pids to the list of
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 10:58, François Pons wrote:
Overall, I can broadly say...it worked. Good marks for that :). But,
there were some gotchas along the way. First of all there was rather an
annoying problem with openSSL. When I just did an --auto-select, it
failed due to missing
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3515
Product: xmms-more-vis-plugins
Component: packaging
Summary: /usr/share/doc/xmms-more-vis-plugins-1.6.0/ directory is
not owned by the package
Version: 1.6.0-2mdk
Platform: PC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3516
Product: Hardware
Component: Network
Summary: kaweth module error
Version: 9.1-1mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3518
Product: Hardware
Component: Hardware
Summary: USB2 module and device detection with nForce2
motherboard
Version: 9.1-1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
I have couple of years old Riva TNT2 Ultra and I have only used XFree86
drivers which comes within Mandrake, ie. I have not bothered to download
NVidia's drivers. That's because I do not have any fancy game which would
need them.
I thinks that Thomas Backlund (writing often to this list) has
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:07, Adam Williamson wrote:
Secondly, urpmi is still not quite good enough for doing a
between-versions upgrade entirely automatically, because of the problem
of adding new packages. It installed several config files which expected
the Galaxy theme packages, but
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 04:34:01PM -0500, Eugenio Diaz wrote:
After reading what Linus had to say about dump backups on live
filesystems, and since I don't want to unmount my filesystems (on my
home machine of course) during backup, I considered the snapshot
feature of LVM. Also I was
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
o X test, background is gray (reported by others)
I should have fixed it on:
revision 1.24
date: 2003/03/09 20:31:02; author: gc; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
fix background of X test during install
But on my test machine it's impossible to ask for the X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Jason Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok, where is that option in the gui then??
I KNOW what it can do from the command line, I mean that these great
features need to be in the GUI.
Cheers
Jason
You're right, misread it. But this would be a
Jason Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All my point was, was that there are many functionalities of
URPMI (indeed many Mandrake config/admin utils) not available
graphically. If these could be made available via a GUI then more
newbies would experience their power and advertise it via word
Join the club. MOST of my bug reports over the years have been ignored and/or
not attended to, and I am very careful to not file a duplicate or a silly
one. I investigate the, well before i submit to make sure they are correct
and to the point. I even offer solutions many times.
I think they
Ouch.
Okay, let me rephrase that...
Has anyone here ever taken a regular application with one dynamic library, and
built an RPM with both i586 and i686/mmx libraries?
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
MM,
I wish to report a problem with MSN.
As lots of my friends use MSN GROUPS for their websites, I am kind a forced
to take part in this.
So I have my Mandrake Linux Website while they have their MSN Groups Websites.
The problem I face is I have no possibility to put my banner on their
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
El Viernes, 21 de Marzo de 2003 23:58, Dennis D Courtney escribió:
Then why do I have over 400 mb left over on the last cd?
I have used cds of 700Mb and just 650 used; moreover, the creation of isos is
previous to the cd burn.
I think is
David : just a question about my problem. I try to understand what is
incompatible between PPP and DHCP. I read that doing a little RTFM :
Important: You SHOULD NOT use the DHCP server within IPNetRouter to
configure your client machines when using this single ethernet setup. If you
do so, your
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3515
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 14:22 ---
I have finally found an X-Server that works with my Toshiba 8100. I had to use
Savage/sw_cursor and X is as solid as ever. I don't know what sw_cursor is but it
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3499
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 14:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=390)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=390action=view)
Patch the typo as of comment #3
If Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] can
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #390 is|0 |1
obsolete|
RC 3 instead of 9.1 ???
Look at the above ftp site and answer me if i'am corrcect ...
Mdk'sreverting to a third rc instead of final ???
File: Clic-PH1-9.0-SNAP_DEC2002.iso 646432 KB 21.12.2002 12:43:00
File: Clic-PH1-9.0-SNAP_DEC2002.md5sum 1 KB 21.12.2002 12:43:00
File:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3519
Product: rpmlint
Component: rpmlint
Summary: some test to add to rpmlint.
Version: 0.48-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 16:59, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
RC 3 instead of 9.1 ???
rah, g, don't say that, you don't know mdk guis like to play ;)
See my private mail to you ;))
--
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin -
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 08:11, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 16:59, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
RC 3 instead of 9.1 ???
rah, g, don't say that, you don't know mdk guis like to play ;)
See my private mail to you ;))
Suspect it's the same game they played with 9.0... ;}
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 08:15, Lenny Cartier posted as excerpted below:
Description :
ksu is a Gtk+ frontend
Missed the G
--
Duncan
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. --
Benjamin Franklin
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 06:56, Pixel posted as excerpted below:
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.. I was pretty disgusted with DiskDrake as well, after I'd put a bunch
of comments in detialing the various mount options, ran DiskDrake, and
not only had it delete or mix up the comments and
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 06:07, Adam Williamson posted as excerpted below:
Yes, that was a problem too, but I know that's known so I didn't mention
it. I just used my standard workaround...make /var/cache/urpmi/rpms a
symlink from a bigger partition :)
Hmm.. Same here.. /var I made pretty small,
w9ya wrote:
As I understand the gcc docs, using both -march and -mcpu is odd. You should
probably be running these tests with just -march or just -mcpu. There may be
some other issues as well, but this is as good a place to start as any.
Bob Finch
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 03:12 pm, Austin
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3282
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 16:30 ---
I tried LM9.1rc2 over the weekend and this bug still
exists.
swap.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2525
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.21-0.13mdk |2.4.21-0.11mdk
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at the
moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3 comming???
Regards
--
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia
España (Spain)
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3520
Product: kernel
Component: libsasl2-plug-ntlm
Summary: mdk91.rc2 : scanner works but after many hours on it
does not
Version: 2.4.21-0.11mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3457
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
Product: rpmdrake
Component: rpmdrake
Summary: Cooker RPMDrake can't add MandrakeClub Commercial Source
Version: 2.1-13mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2
and, at the moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3 comming???
Seems this way. I am downloading and I think a get a surprise.
Downloading from http://www.klid.dk/sw/Mandrake-iso/i586/
and
A Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:58:37 +0100
Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait:
Seems this way. I am downloading and I think a get a surprise.
Downloading from http://www.klid.dk/sw/Mandrake-iso/i586/
and ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-iso/i586
I think so :)
jean-seb
--
Site
Strange. Fast mirrors do not pick it up?
look at ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/Mandrake-iso/i586
Tom
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 11:58, Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner wrote:
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2
and, at the moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about the bugs with many votes?
[...]
3 784 cri P2 PC Installa 9.1beta package selection fails
Strange, no one here have ever seen that..
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Am Montag, 24. März 2003 20:16 schrieb Thomas Spuhler:
Strange. Fast mirrors do not pick it up?
look at ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/Mandrake-iso/i586
Tom
I think they part it to several mirrors, the fast ones for public
announced downloads.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner Fon/SMS
Again, some of the flags are being used wrong:
Giuseppe please check the gcc docs, as some (most) flags are redundant with
-02 and almost all are with -03. Things have changed radically in this area
with the upgrade to 3.x
Bob Finch
On Monday 24 March 2003 12:24 pm, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2003 19:48, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at
the moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3 comming???
Regards
Didn't they use this trick with 9.0. Wasn't rc3==9.0gold
Reinout van Schouwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
There are a number of pretty serious bug still, and I would hate to see
Mandrake 9.1 ship as cooker currently is. Some of them are trivial to
Hmm... what I'm wondering is if Mandrakesoft will make up
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3522
Product: rpmdrake
Component: rpmdrake
Summary: RPMDrake complains RPM corrupted, but rpm -i works fine
Version: 2.1-13mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3522
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 18:23 ---
Can you check it is effectively the same problem as 3521 (using wget (by
removing curl for rpmdrake to use it) or using unredirected url using https://
to download area
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:22, andre wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2003 19:48, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at
the moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3 comming???
Regards
Didn't they use this trick with
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3522
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
w9ya wrote:
Again, some of the flags are being used wrong:
Giuseppe please check the gcc docs, as some (most) flags are redundant with
-02 and almost all are with -03. Things have changed radically in this area
with the upgrade to 3.x
Bob Finch
Which flags are you talking about? I wasn't
I have downloaded them at the University, via ssh, but unfortunately I couln't
create the cds until tomorow morning (I am at home).
Regards
El Lunes, 24 de Marzo de 2003 19:58, Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner escribió:
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2
and, at
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Cheers
Jason
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 19:58, Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner a écrit :
Is a rc3 comming???
No doubt, now !
Seems this way. I am downloading and I think a get a surprise.
Downloading from http://www.klid.dk/sw/Mandrake-iso/i586/
and ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-iso/i586
I am very happy
Jason Greenwood wrote:
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Cheers
Jason
I downloaded 2 CDs and they are 650MB and 649MB and I had no troubles
burning them onto 74min CDs.
--
Live long and prosper!
I think you will find it is a ruse. RC3 will be renamed final...as with 9.0.
Cheers
Jason
Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 19:58, Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner a écrit :
Is a rc3 comming???
No doubt, now !
Seems this way. I am downloading and I think a get a surprise.
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood a écrit :
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Nowadays, all the CD are 700M except some RW.
A their cost is about 0.5¤, I don't see for which reason it would be
better to keep the ISO's under 650MB
--
Pierre Jarillon -
On the mirrors they all appear over 680MBis that not right or am I
missing something??
Cheers
Jason
Jure Repinc wrote:
Jason Greenwood wrote:
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Cheers
Jason
I downloaded 2 CDs and they are 650MB and 649MB and I had no troubles
I agree and I don't care personally but it was discussed on Cooker and
IIRC, Mandrake said they were going to keep them under 650MB. I prefer
the 700MB disks but there was concern some burners could not burn them.
Cheers
Jason
Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 21:51, Jason
Hi,
I would like to set a local mirror for a cooker and contrib tree but I don't
have a clue how to make this rsync work properly, so do you have a script for
that ?
Thanks in advance,
Laurent
Yup, my badtoo early for me to be doing multiplication. They are
indeed under...
Cheers
Jason
Murray J. Root wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:03:40AM +1200, Jason Greenwood wrote:
On the mirrors they all appear over 680MBis that not right or am I
missing something??
Cheers
Jason
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
Those are the files I have downloaded, md5sum says OK:
682164224 mar 24 14:17 MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-- 650 Mb
681279488 mar 24 14:19 MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3
681574400 mar 24 14:22 MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3
--
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de
Giuseppe wrote:
w9ya wrote:
Austin wrote: [for me, thanks Austin!]
The best times of the 4 were:
athlon-xp:12.16
i586: 13.24
i586, no mmx: 57.65
Honestly I never found yet a package
that will increase
performance of even 10% just changing the compiler flags
Guiseppe, I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3523
Product: Guppi
Component: program
Summary: Graphs from within gnumeric don't work
Version: 0.40.3-5mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3381
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 20:50 ---
Yes I do - several and varied !! The jist is:
Mar 7 19:30:58 localhost /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: Setup visor for USB product
830/50/100
Mar 7 19:30:58 localhost
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
Product: drakconf
Component: drakconf
Summary: Running drakconf periodically makes the kernel lose the
mouse
Version: 9.1-11mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
