I'm no expert at firewalling, but I have been studying internet security off
and on for the last few years. What in the world will direct translation of
128 IPs to another "hidden" 128 IPs really gain you. From what I can see,
nothing. I would still be able to attack you because an external IP
CTED]>
-Original Message-
From: John Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 3. mai 2001 17:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker-firewall] CookFire and NAT
IF Mandrake Firewall can't do the job there is a FREE Firewall software that
will, I must say it's not as Nice
On Thu, 3 May 2001, philippe Libat wrote:
:~>But, if you have technical skills, you can implement this with ipvsadm
:~>and virtual ip on the firewall, for direct routing configuration
And of corse, you can kindly ($$) ask Philippe to write these rules for
you. .-))
cheers
Denis
--
hi,
philippe Libat a écrit :
>
> hi,
>
> Sveinar Søpler a écrit :
> >
> > Is it possible to do nat'ing like this :
> >
> > I have 128 public ip adresses from my ISP. I want to run several servers++
> > and want all my machines to use the public ip's i have from my ISP. Also
> > when i connect o
hi,
Sveinar Søpler a écrit :
>
> Is it possible to do nat'ing like this :
>
> I have 128 public ip adresses from my ISP. I want to run several servers++
> and want all my machines to use the public ip's i have from my ISP. Also
> when i connect out from one of my machines to external source, li
IF Mandrake Firewall can't do the job there is a FREE Firewall software that
will, I must say it's
not as Nice as mandrake firewall ( I don't think anything is) but it will do
what you want. It's called
Securepoint firewall and they have a freeware version.
http://www.securepoint.cc, but don't giv
