Re: [COOT] Scheme on WinCoot (Win XP)

2009-05-13 Thread Alex Luso
On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:34:36 +0100, Paul Emsley wrote: >> For instance, I was curious what parameters were acceptable for >> set-baton-build-params >> i.e. from the tutorial/manual I know "backwards" is an option. But how to >> reverse it back to normal? "forwards", "forward", "normal"?! > >Oh,

Re: [COOT] Scheme on WinCoot (Win XP)

2009-05-13 Thread Alex Luso
On Wed, 13 May 2009 23:29:28 +0100, Paul Emsley wrote: >> About the underlying problem - the text in scheme widgets - is that a missing >> feature in the Windows scheme libraries or some weird bug? >Can you be somewhat more precise in you description of the "text in >scheme widgets"? > >Paul.

Re: [COOT] Scheme on WinCoot (Win XP)

2009-05-13 Thread Alex Luso
Hi Bernhard, Thanks for the clarification. >commenting on this. Maybe there should be some low level implementation >without the use of fancy (scheme) widgets, so that at least scripts can >be run.. (on my - long - list now). Ok, I think that would be a good idea. Given the fact that almost

[COOT] Scheme on WinCoot (Win XP)

2009-05-11 Thread Alex Luso
Hi, I am new to Coot - I have been experimenting with the examples on the wiki page and it appears that scheme/guile scripting does not work in WinCoot (0.5.2). Just wanted to confirm if I am correct. I am/was a little confused b/c it appears the libraries and paths to scheme/guile get instal