hg: jdk7/tl/jaxp: 6900341: jaxp/jaxws ant scripts using ant runtime in classpath, needs to be explicit

Changeset: cc17d7ea1b76 Author:ohair Date: 2009-11-11 11:17 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxp/rev/cc17d7ea1b76 6900341: jaxp/jaxws ant scripts using ant runtime in classpath, needs to be explicit Reviewed-by: tbell ! build.properties ! build.xml ! make/Makefile

hg: jdk7/tl/jaxws: 6900341: jaxp/jaxws ant scripts using ant runtime in classpath, needs to be explicit

Changeset: 4023edcd8433 Author:ohair Date: 2009-11-11 11:19 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxws/rev/4023edcd8433 6900341: jaxp/jaxws ant scripts using ant runtime in classpath, needs to be explicit Reviewed-by: tbell ! build.properties ! build.xml ! make/Makefile

Re: Anyway in java to way for the child process to wait for parent process to die

On Nov 12, 8:29am, david.hol...@sun.com (David Holmes - Sun Microsystems) wrote: -- Subject: Re: Anyway in java to way for the child process to wait for paren | Paulo Levi said the following on 11/12/09 05:31: | > In process builder. | | No. | | I'm not aware of any OS support for waiting for

Re: Anyway in java to way for the child process to wait for parent process to die

It's ok. I think i worked around it by marking shutdownhooks with a specific name and join()-ing them in another shutdown hook. Then i can restart the application safely. It's not very obvious though. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:29 PM, David Holmes - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Paulo Levi said the f

Re: Adding constant for line.separator and friends

Am 11.11.2009 22:48, Martin Buchholz schrieb: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:46, Stephen Colebourne mailto:scolebou...@joda.org>> wrote: Martin Buchholz wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:10, Ulf Zibis mailto:ulf.zi...@gmx.de>

Re: Anyway in java to way for the child process to wait for parent process to die

Paulo Levi said the following on 11/12/09 05:31: In process builder. No. I'm not aware of any OS support for waiting for a parent process to die. David Holmes

Re: Adding constant for line.separator and friends

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:46, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Martin Buchholz wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:10, Ulf Zibis > ulf.zi...@gmx.de>> wrote: >>At least, IMO, fileSeparator() and pathSeparator() would belong to >>java.io.File or java.nio.file.FileSystem. >> Those would have b

Re: Adding constant for line.separator and friends

Martin Buchholz wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:10, Ulf Zibis > wrote: At least, IMO, fileSeparator() and pathSeparator() would belong to java.io.File or java.nio.file.FileSystem. Those would have been better names, but at this point they are not worth adding.

Anyway in java to way for the child process to wait for parent process to die

In process builder.

Re: New convention for static methods ?

That convention has been around a while for interfaces. Why the convention is being used for the class FileSystem I don't know. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote: > Hi all, > > is that new JDK convention having *s classes for static methods? > Refer to java.nio.file.FileSystem v

Re: Adding constant for line.separator and friends

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:10, Ulf Zibis wrote: > At least, IMO, fileSeparator() and pathSeparator() would belong to > java.io.File or java.nio.file.FileSystem. > > Those would have been better names, but at this point they are not worth adding. Martin

New convention for static methods ?

Hi all, is that new JDK convention having *s classes for static methods? Refer to java.nio.file.FileSystem vs. java.nio.file.FileSystems. -Ulf

Re: Adding constant for line.separator and friends

Am 11.11.2009 01:40, Martin Buchholz schrieb: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:06, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Martin, If we're settled on a method in System, please send a revised spec and I'll file the ccc paperwork. I'm agnostic about whether it belongs in System or File or elsewhere, A

Re: Review please: 6367077 : Purge LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the Unix launchers

Thanks Martin, I will take care of that. Kumar Thanks for doing this. 10-minute review looks good. One minor comment: You probably want to die if "sun.arch.data.model" is not either "32" or "64". +static final boolean is64Bit = +System.getProperty("sun.arch.data.model", "32"

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6899694: Dual-pivot quicksort improvements

Changeset: 18c2b761548a Author:alanb Date: 2009-11-11 14:38 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/18c2b761548a 6899694: Dual-pivot quicksort improvements Reviewed-by: jjb Contributed-by: vladimir.yaroslavs...@sun.com, joshua.bl...@google.com ! src/share/classes/java