On 17/10/2013 20:25, Andrew wrote:
:
Is the intention for these 'exported' APIs to be eventually replaced by proper
parts of the specification (i.e. java.* or javax.*). I'm not keen on the idea
of encouraging the use of APIs that are only in this implementation of the JDK.
Just to add to Mandy'
On 10/17/13 12:25 PM, Andrew wrote:
I just came across this trying to understand what the new annotation means.
Is the intention for these 'exported' APIs to be eventually replaced by proper
parts of the specification (i.e. java.* or javax.*). I'm not keen on the idea
of encouraging the use of
- Original Message -
>
> As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exported,
> I'd like to have another attempt at adding the annotation to a number of
> JDK specific APIs that are long standing exported, documented and
> supported APIs. Specifically, the following APIs:
Changeset: 2ea162b2ff55
Author:alanb
Date: 2013-10-09 09:20 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2ea162b2ff55
8008662: Add @jdk.Exported to JDK-specific/exported APIs
Reviewed-by: chegar, vinnie, dfuchs, mchung, mullan, darcy
! src/share/classes/com/sun/jdi
Hello,
I skimmed the patch and it looked fine.
More generally, we want every package and top-level class in the
com.sun.* namespace to be either explicitly exported or not.
Cheers,
-Joe
On 10/6/2013 1:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.
On 10/07/2013 08:58 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/10/2013 13:36, Sean Mullan wrote:
We have only started removing some deprecated things in JDK, so it
just was never thought about until now. Marking these as supported
going forward strikes me as a bit strange, since we don't really want
anyone
On 07/10/2013 13:36, Sean Mullan wrote:
We have only started removing some deprecated things in JDK, so it
just was never thought about until now. Marking these as supported
going forward strikes me as a bit strange, since we don't really want
anyone using these anymore.
As a guide, I think w
On 10/07/2013 08:28 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/10/2013 13:26, Sean Mullan wrote:
7 classes in com.sun.security.auth have been deprecated for several
major releases now. Should they still have this annotation?
--Sean
I know but aren't they still exported and supported?
They have all had AP
On 07/10/2013 13:26, Sean Mullan wrote:
7 classes in com.sun.security.auth have been deprecated for several
major releases now. Should they still have this annotation?
--Sean
I know but aren't they still exported and supported?
DialogCallbackHandler is the only one with its name on a bullet.
7 classes in com.sun.security.auth have been deprecated for several
major releases now. Should they still have this annotation?
--Sean
On 10/06/2013 04:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exported,
I'd like to have another attempt at adding
On 07/10/2013 11:31, Mandy Chung wrote:
:
For the review then the intention is that @jdk.Exported be added to
the package-info and all public/protected types in these APIs. The
only exceptions are two cases where I've added @jdk.Exported(false),
specifically:
- com.sun.management.OSMBeanF
On 10/6/2013 1:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
The webrev with the proposed update is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8008662/webrev.02/
I went through the entire webrev and the change looks good.
For the review then the intention is that @jdk.Exported be added to
the package-info a
Hi Alan,
The com.sun.management changes look good.
-- daniel
On 10/6/13 10:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exported,
I'd like to have another attempt at adding the annotation to a number of
JDK specific APIs that are long standing export
The JAAS and JGSS changes look fine too.
On 7 Oct 2013, at 09:23, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I checked the httpsever and sctp changes. All look good to me.
>
> -Chris.
>
> On 10/06/2013 09:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exp
Alan,
I checked the httpsever and sctp changes. All look good to me.
-Chris.
On 10/06/2013 09:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exported,
I'd like to have another attempt at adding the annotation to a number of
JDK specific APIs that are l
As a follow-up to Joe Darcy's rename of jdk.Supported to jdk.Exported,
I'd like to have another attempt at adding the annotation to a number of
JDK specific APIs that are long standing exported, documented and
supported APIs. Specifically, the following APIs:
- Java Debug Interface (com.sun.
16 matches
Mail list logo
