Hi Jeremy,
I just proposed a patch on core-libs-dev.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 06/12/2017 01:17, Jeremy Manson wrote:
Hey folks,
Any thoughts on a timeline for this? We're just having to decide what to
do internally. If a patch is likely to arrive in the next month or so,
then we'll prob
that to include the links to this new issue. Now that I've linked
this message thread to that message thread that should crash the internet. :)
Jason
____
From: core-libs-dev on behalf of Daniel
Fuchs
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Jason Mehrens; mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
Hi Jason,
I have done a few tests with JDK 8 & 7.
I have created custom handlers and added some
debug traces in their constructors and debug methods.
Then I have added th
Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>>
Fuchs mailto:daniel.fu...@oracle.com>>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
On 09/11/2017 19:
ns/36726431/in-a-java-util-logging-logging-properties-file-whats-the-difference-between-h
>> I've updated that to include the links to this new issue. Now that I've
>> linked this message thread to that message thread that should crash the
>> internet. :)
>> Jason
>&g
sage thread that should crash the internet. :)
Jason
From: core-libs-dev on behalf of Daniel
Fuchs
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
On 09/11/2017 19:16, mandy chung wrote:
D
-dev on behalf of
Daniel Fuchs
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
On 09/11/2017 19:16, mandy chung wrote:
> Daniel - we should add this known issue in the release note and documen
On 09/11/2017 19:16, mandy chung wrote:
Daniel - we should add this known issue in the release note and document
the workaround.
Hi Mandy,
Right, it either need to be fixed, or documented in the release
notes. Let me first have a look at the issue though.
best regards,
-- daniel
Daniel - we should add this known issue in the release note and document
the workaround.
Mandy
On 11/9/17 9:48 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I'm afraid I don't have a timeline at this point, but I will
try having a look at the issue in the next couple of days.
best regards,
-- daniel
Hi Jeremy,
I'm afraid I don't have a timeline at this point, but I will
try having a look at the issue in the next couple of days.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 09/11/2017 17:42, Jeremy Manson wrote:
Thanks, Daniel. That is the issue. I probably should have described it
more clearly.
Do you
Thanks, Daniel. That is the issue. I probably should have described it
more clearly.
Do you have a sense of a fix timeline? If there is a relatively prompt
fix, I can backport it to our internal build instead of introducing churn
in our many, many logging configuration files. If it is likely t
Sorry Jeremy,
I think I misread your issue.
The issue is that .handlers=X behaves differently than handlers=X
I'm afraid I might have introduced this regression with
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033661 :-(
The obvious workaround for now would be to use
handlers=
as documented in th
Hi Jeremy,
Which jdk version/distribution are you using?
I see .level = INFO in the jdk9/master sources:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/tip/src/java.logging/share/conf/logging.properties
There should be no changes WRT the default level between 8 and 9.
best regards,
-- daniel
14 matches
Mail list logo
