Hi Uwe,
b110 is available on java.net and fixes to your issues are included !
Rgds, Rory
On 12/03/2016 11:43, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to inform you that the first Lucene test with build 109 of JDK were working
with Ant and Ivy (both on Linux and Windows including whitespace in
On 18/03/2016 09:54, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Alan,
sorry I already opened JI-9032467 in the bug tracker.
This has moved to the JDK project as JDK-8152163 and I see closed as a
dup of JDK-8152161.
What change caused this? All previous builds had all the mbeans, just build 110
does not hav
On 17/03/2016 18:39, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
JDK-9 build 109 works, build 110 does not work. This is *not* about Jigsaw,
just the standard JDK build.
I have the feeling this is just a packaging bug. The META-INF/services file in
question contains a class that is missing in the jimage.
Just
.@openjdk.java.net>; Steve Drach ; Alan
> Bateman ; hotspot compiler compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Uwe Schindler
> wrote:
>
À: "Core-Libs-Dev" , "Rory O'Donnell"
>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 17:03:25
> Objet: RE: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> Hi,
>
> In fact, any static method on ManagementFactor
[mailto:mandy.ch...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Remi Forax
Cc: Mandy Chung ; Uwe Schindler
; Rory O'Donnell ;
core-libs-dev
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
Hotspot patches
Some but not all com.sun.* API that ar
; From: core-libs-dev [mailto:core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On
> Behalf Of Uwe Schindler
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 4:40 PM
> To: 'Core-Libs-Dev' ; 'Rory O'Donnell'
>
> Subject: RE: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still
5 PM
> To: Uwe Schindler ; 'Mandy Chung'
>
> Cc: rory.odonn...@oracle.com; 'Core-Libs-Dev' d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Can you l
nnell ;
> core-libs-dev
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> Some but not all com.sun.* API that are unsupported.
> com.sun.management is an exported API.
>
> Can you try jdk-9+109? It may be a
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> My local tests showed that the MethodHandle-bug is solved, the other one is
> hopefully fixed, too. Robert may have a way to quickly reproduce.
>
JDK-8150280 is fixed too, I just tested it. Thanks!
h' ; Alan
> Bateman
> Cc: rory.odonn...@oracle.com; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
> 'Robert Muir'
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> b110 is available on java.net
Donnell"
> , "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 19:35:44
> Objet: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> Some but not all com.sun.* API that are unsupported. com.sun.management is
> an exported A
e: "Uwe Schindler"
>> À: "Core-Libs-Dev" , "Rory O'Donnell"
>>
>> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 17:03:25
>> Objet: RE: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again;still
>> missing Hotspot patches
>>
>&g
:fo...@univ-mlv.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:24 PM
> To: Uwe Schindler
> Cc: Core-Libs-Dev ; Rory O'Donnell
>
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -> Lucene's Ant build works again; still missing
> Hotspot patches
>
> It's not a bug, it's a fe
://lucene.apache.org/
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:43 AM
> To: Uwe Schindler
> Cc: 'Rory O'Donnell' ; 'Core-Libs-Dev' d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 109 -&
On 12/03/2016 11:43, Uwe Schindler wrote:
:
Nevertheless, build 109 does not contain (according to the changelog) fixes for JDK-8150436 (still
fails consistently) and JDK-8148786 (our duplicate issue JDK-8150280, happens sometimes). Those
patches were committed long ago. What's the reason fo
16 matches
Mail list logo
