I decided to care just enough about the last 2x of scalability, but not
about the last 8 elements.
Your code would resize the 2g elements 8 times before finally reaching
MAX_VALUE...
Now I'm back in not-caring-anymore mode.
At least about MAX_ARRAY_SIZE.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Ulf Zibi
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Martin Buchholz:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/ByteArrayOutputStream-MAX_ARRAY_SIZE/
The 2x capacity gap was noticed by real users!
Hi Martin,
the MAX_ARRAY_SIZE code now is copied to many pl
I'll submit soonish.
@summary second line indented.
I added some gratuitous assertions to the test:
// check data integrity while we're here
byte[] bytes = baos.toByteArray();
if (bytes.length != n)
throw new AssertionError("wro
On 25/08/2014 21:45, Martin Buchholz wrote:
:
jtreg tests are run by default with -ignore:quiet and there is
precedent for other tests with such @ignore statements, and I actually
used jtreg -ignore:run to really test this.
What I would really like someday is to be able to run expensive test
This looks fine to me as well.
I am fine with the @ignore as I don't suspect anyone would be able to sneak in
a change which removed the @ignore without anyone noticing and the comment for
why it is marked @ignore seems adequate.
Mike
On Aug 25 2014, at 13:28 , Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 25/08
Thanks, Alan.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
> On 25/08/2014 18:37, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
>
> I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge
> array resizing back in
> 6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly i
On 25/08/2014 18:37, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge
array resizing back in
6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly in core libraries
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjd
Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge array
resizing back in
6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly in core libraries
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/ByteArrayOut
