On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:27:57 GMT, SUN Guoyun wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> When -Xcomp be used, this testcase will use more codecaches, causing the GC
>> to be triggered early, then causing this test failed on LoongArch64
>> architecture.
>>
>> This PR fix the issue, Please help review it.
>>
>>
If a stream specific
> filter is set and does not accept or reject a class, the combined filter is
> applied.
>
> This is a doc-only change.
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8301863: ObjectInputFilter e
The example code in ObjectInputFilter for the FilterInThread filter factory
does not do what is intended and is poorly described. Clarifies that the
JVM-wide filter and the thread local filter are merged and will reject classes
that are otherwise not accepted or rejected. If a stream specific
Hi Andrey,
Instead, perhaps replace (carefully) the remaining uses in the JDK.
Developers should be using the correct APIs and not reading deprecated
javadoc.
Regards, Roger
On 2/6/23 11:41 AM, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
Hello.
I've noticed that method 'long java.util.Date.parse(String)'
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:44:07 GMT, SUN Guoyun wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> When -Xcomp be used, this testcase will use more codecaches, causing the GC
>> to be triggered early, then causing this test failed on LoongArch64
>> architecture.
>>
>> This PR fix the issue, Please help review it.
>>
>>
CompSci)
Author of "The Java™ Specialists' Newsletter" -www.javaspecialists.eu
Java Champion -www.javachampions.org
JavaOne Rock Star Speaker
Tel: +30 69 75 595 262
Skype: kabutz
On 2023/02/06 06:55, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Heinz,
Indeed, this example is not intuitive and does not do what was
Hi Heinz,
Indeed, this example is not intuitive and does not do what was intended
and could use a better explanation.
The interaction of three filters gets complicated and their combination
depends on the ordering and intention of each filter and the particular
filter factory goal. The
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:44:54 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> `ZoneOffset` instances are cached by the `ZoneOffset` class itself for
>> values in the range [-18h, 18h] for each second that is on an even quarter
>> of an hour (i.e. at most 2*18*4+1 = 145 values).
>>
>> Instead of using a
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 03:52:39 GMT, SUN Guoyun wrote:
> Hi all,
> When -Xcomp be used, java thread to block for longer, then causing this test
> failed frequently on the AArch64 and LoongArch64 architecture.
>
> This PR fix the issue, Please help review it.
>
> Thanks.
What is the connection
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 22:56:27 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> implicitly uses the access flags from the current/most recent class file
> fo
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:04:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR suggests improving performance by using the newly introduced class
>> `jdk.internal.util.ByteArray` to improve packing/unpacking operations.
>>
>> The PR also proposes adding a `ByteArrayLittleEndian` class for support for
>>
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:22:25 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> Currently, `java.io.Bits` is using explicit logic to read/write various
>> primitive types to/from byte arrays. Switching to the use of `VarHandle`
>> access would provide better performance and less code.
>>
>> Also, using a standard
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:47:27 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> This is the javadoc of `JavaLangAccess::newStringNoRepl`:
>
>
> /**
> * Constructs a new {@code String} by decoding the specified subarray of
> * bytes using the specified {@linkplain java.nio.charset.Charset
> charset}.
> *
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:47:27 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> This is the javadoc of `JavaLangAccess::newStringNoRepl`:
>
>
> /**
> * Constructs a new {@code String} by decoding the specified subarray of
> * bytes using the specified {@linkplain java.nio.charset.Charset
> charset}.
> *
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:27:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/Formatter/BasicInt.java line 1:
>>
>>> 1: /*
>>
>> It looks line the non-float/double test classes are unchanged, they could be
>> dropped from the PR.
>
> The only changes I made myself in the test files are
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:19:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Align `double` and `float` decimal conversions in `java.util.Formatter` with
>> the algorithm used in `Double.toString(double)`.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:19:22 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> A simple fix in core reflection to check if the number of actual and formal
> parameters differ before invoking the method or the constructor regardless of
> whether it's a specialized case or not.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:39:04 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR suggests improving performance by using the newly introduced class
> `jdk.internal.util.ByteArray` to improve packing/unpacking operations.
>
> The PR also proposes adding a `ByteArrayLittleEndian` class for support for
> little
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:38:58 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Currently Set.copyOf allocates both a HashSet and a new empty array when the
>> input collection is empty.
>>
>> This patch avoids allocating anything for the case where the parameter
>> collection's isEmpty returns true.
>
> Viktor
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:44:17 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes using a performance optimization using a new supported API
>> for operations similar to those found in `java.io.Bits`
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:24:16 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> Some of the fields in java.io can be declared as final.
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12140
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:53:38 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> Some variables are declared using old-style declarations. These should be
> modified to conform to modern style.
>
> This is a task derived from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11848
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:36:01 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes to reduce the visibility for constructor and methods in
>> `java.io.SerialCallbackContext`.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Update
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:34:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes using a performance optimization using a new supported API
> for operations similar to those found in `java.io.Bits`
src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectStreamClass.java line 2486:
> 2484: );
> 2485:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:52:16 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> The addition of the new enum constant for ClassFileFormatVersion.RELEASE_21
> neglected to include an @since tag; this should be corrected.
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12107
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:34:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes using a performance optimization using a new supported API
> for operations similar to those found in `java.io.Bits`
Some comments:
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/Bits.java line 43:
> 41: }
> 42:
>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:46:26 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Went through the jdk and found a few more places where
>> `ArraysSupport::vectorizedHashCode` can be used, and a few where adhoc
>> methods could be replaced with a plain call to `java.util.Arrays`
>> equivalents. This patch addresses
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:27:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use improved anchor syntax in UnicastRemoteObject.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12083
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:06:25 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix typo found in code review.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharSequence.java line 76:
>
>> 74: *
>>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:50:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> [JDK-8295729](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295729) was created in an
>> attempt to remove all trailing whitespace from properties files, and enable
>> a jcheck verification that they did not come back, similar to other
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:31:06 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The current description of Runtime.exec, ProcessBuilder.start, and
> ProcessBuilder.startPipeline identifies a minimum set of system dependent
> environment variables needed to launch a process and allows additional system
&g
The current description of Runtime.exec, ProcessBuilder.start, and
ProcessBuilder.startPipeline identifies a minimum set of system dependent
environment variables needed to launch a process and allows additional system
dependent environment variables to be present in the child. However, it does
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:17:41 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Fixing the subject method to recover gracefully on a failed
> `ZoneRulesProvider` registration.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11928
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:02:22 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> The javadocs of the following methods used deprecated constructors of the
>> primitive wrapper classes:
>>
>> java.lang.ArrayStoreException
>> java.lang.ClassCastException
>> java.lang.Double.compare(double, double)
>>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:02:22 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> The javadocs of the following methods used deprecated constructors of the
>> primitive wrapper classes:
>>
>> java.lang.ArrayStoreException
>> java.lang.ClassCastException
>> java.lang.Double.compare(double, double)
>>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:02:22 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> The javadocs of the following methods used deprecated constructors of the
>> primitive wrapper classes:
>>
>> java.lang.ArrayStoreException
>> java.lang.ClassCastException
>> java.lang.Double.compare(double, double)
>>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:52:51 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectStreamConstants.java line 38:
>>
>>> 36: * Magic number that is written to the stream header.
>>> 37: */
>>> 38: short STREAM_MAGIC = (short)0xaced;
>>
>> I'd prefer to retain the
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:06:15 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> Code in java.io contains many legacy constructs and semantics not
>> recommended including:
>>
>> * C-style array declaration
>> * Unnecessary visibility
>> * Redundant keywords in interfaces (e.g. public, static)
>> * Non-standard
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:34:49 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> Code in java.io contains many legacy constructs and semantics not
>> recommended including:
>>
>> * C-style array declaration
>> * Unnecessary visibility
>> * Redundant keywords in interfaces (e.g. public, static)
>> * Non-standard
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:41:20 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Currently Set.copyOf allocates both a HashSet and a new empty array when the
> input collection is empty.
>
> This patch avoids allocating anything for the case where the parameter
> collection's isEmpty returns true.
LGTM
-
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:49:42 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> Thanks. Do you think I should push this into JDK 20 instead of 21?
Yes, if the test should be run (and has not been running) pushing to 20 will
get it running sooner on the release that ships next.
-
PR:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
Or you can push to 21 and then use the lightweight "/backport" command.
-
PR:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
LGTM; Test fixes are ok for JDK 20 backport.
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:12:15 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Update javadoc examples to use try-with-resources and use javadoc snippet
> tags.
> The examples in ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream get an update with
> try-with-resources and use of javadoc snippet tags.
> Ob
of html markup.
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Simplify ObjectInputExample based on review comments.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20/pull/59/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk2
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:22:22 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Update javadoc examples to use try-with-resources and use javadoc snippet
>> tags.
>> The examples in ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream get an update with
>> try-with-resources and use of javadoc snippet tags.
>>
Update javadoc examples to use try-with-resources and use javadoc snippet tags.
The examples in ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream get an update with
try-with-resources and use of javadoc snippet tags.
ObjectInputFilter is updated with use of snippet tags instead of html markup.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:26:40 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes making a field in `RandomAccessFile` final. Also, it
>> modernises a switch statement.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Make the field
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:37:17 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:23:04 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Hi Roger , the new proposed version JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION_DO is now almost as
> lengthy as the original coding, Is it really worth it introducing a macro
> when it gets so lengthy ?
Its easier to understand the flow and cleanup being
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:37:17 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:17:57 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Should the masking out unassigned bits that is done in this method be
>> extended to the existing `AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags(mask, location)`;
>> Instead of throwing `IllegalArgumentException`?
>> The two methods should be consistent in
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 03:33:25 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> I would propose to say:
>>
>> Mask bits that do not match an {@code AccessFlag} for the location and
>> class file format version are ignored.
>>
>> The case arises when the mask argument contains mask bits that are not
>>
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:20:26 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We have a number of places in the codebase where a macro could help when we
> check an exception and afterwrads free something and return.
Good idea, though perhaps the return (and value if any) could be explicit in
the macro
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:39:28 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> I found out that this code
>>
>> public class Main {
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>> String s = "Hello world!";
>> char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
>> int point = Character.codePointAt(chars,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:20:26 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We have a number of places in the codebase where a macro could help when we
> check an exception and afterwrads free something and return.
The existing (and new) macro naming doesn't make clear that it always returns
from the
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:28:24 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> I found out that this code
>>
>> public class Main {
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>> String s = "Hello world!";
>> char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
>> int point = Character.codePointAt(chars,
e flags for a particular mask, Location,
> and class file format version:
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Class.accessFlags(): Remove an overeaching requirement on array component type
AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags(m
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:47:29 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Updated the descriptions of AccessFlags being dependent on the class file
>> version num
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:43:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Updated the descriptions of AccessFlags being dependent on the class file
>> version num
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:22:36 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> Yeah, this AIOOBE is exactly the reason why I added this. So should we
>> modify `codePointBefore` in the same way as `codePointAt`?
>
> I'm asking because counter-intuitively `codePointBefore ` doesn't specify
> IOOBE for negative
e flags for a particular mask, Location,
> and class file format version:
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Updated the descriptions of AccessFlags being dependent on the class file
version number.
Removed unnecess
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:53:21 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> I found out that this code
>>
>> public class Main {
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>> String s = "Hello world!";
>> char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
>> int point = Character.codePointAt(chars,
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:44:18 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> I found out that this code
>
> public class Main {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> String s = "Hello world!";
> char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
> int point = Character.codePointAt(chars, -1, 1);
>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:00:15 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> The reason why it was passing prior to these changes is that
> `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` extends `IndexOutOfBoundsException` and the
> latter is caught in the test.
Perhaps then, tighten up the test. It seems odd to have a case
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:44:18 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> I found out that this code
>
> public class Main {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> String s = "Hello world!";
> char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
> int point = Character.codePointAt(chars, -1, 1);
>
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:14:07 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> `String.offsetByCodePoints()` delegates to `Character.offsetByCodePoints()`
>> which in turn specifies the same exception thrown under the same conditions
>> and the implementation does exactly the same checks. This means we can
>>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:17:47 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> `String.offsetByCodePoints()` delegates to `Character.offsetByCodePoints()`
>> which in turn specifies the same exception thrown under the same conditions
>> and the implementation does exactly the same checks. This means we can
>>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 22:56:27 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> assume the access flags are from the current/most recent class file format
The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
assume the access flags are from the current/most recent class file format
version. For current and past class file format versions there are few
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:52:09 GMT, Weibing Xiao wrote:
> fix the illegal characters of directory names in Windows
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11393
Please review a PR to put the test on the ProblemList until the test is
fixed.
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11334
Thanks, Roger
On 11/23/22 3:27 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:35:46 GMT, Weibing Xiao wrote:
print warning message for java.io.tmpdir when it is
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:40:10 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/FormatProcessor.java line 85:
>>
>>> 83:
>>> 84: /**
>>> 85: * {@inheritDoc}
>>
>> The javadoc should describe in more detail what `process` does and the
>> errors than can occur.
>> That
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:55:38 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:17:41 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/FormatProcessor.java line 64:
>>
>>> 62: *
>>> 63: * @implSpec Since, values are found within the string template,
>>> argument indexing
>>> 64: * specifiers are unsupported.
>>
>> What is the
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:55:38 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:38:02 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> This commit guards thread modifications for the process reaper thread with
>> doPrivileged.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/misc/InnocuousThread.java line 137:
>
>> 135: public static Thread newSystemThread(String name,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:58:09 GMT, Dongxu Wang wrote:
> 8297385: Remove duplicated null typos in javadoc
Looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11311
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:43:16 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
Hi Chris,
Yes, adding a doPriv for setDaemon and setName in a couple of places
makes sense.
Thanks, Roger
On 11/22/22 11:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 22/11/2022 16:08, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/11/2022 15:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
..
Just to double check, does the ES
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:05:45 GMT, Dongxu Wang wrote:
> 8297385: Remove duplicated null typos in javadoc
The source of this PR is the "master" branch of your fork. Note the Comment
from the bot at the top.
The conventional usage is to create a branch specific to the change you are
making and
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:10:11 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:12:53 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 233:
>>
>>> 231:
>>> 232: /**
>>> 233: * Returns a StringTemplate with the given fragments and values.
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> * Returns a {@code
Hi,
I agree the exception message could be added to facilitate the
understanding and the resolution of UnsupportedOperationExceptions from
List implementations.
New issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297283
As to what should be included in the message, that will need more
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:36:51 GMT, Weibing Xiao wrote:
>> print warning message for java.io.tmpdir when it is set through the command
>> line and the value is not good for creating file folder.
>
> Weibing Xiao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:45:56 GMT, Weibing Xiao wrote:
>> print warning message for java.io.tmpdir when it is set through the command
>> line and the value is not good for creating file folder.
>
> Weibing Xiao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:03:37 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Weibing Xiao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> the change according to review comment
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 03:26:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
> support
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:33:50 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:51:24 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:02:32 GMT, Weibing Xiao wrote:
>> print warning message for java.io.tmpdir when it is set through the command
>> line and the value is not good for creating file folder.
>
> Weibing Xiao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:30:07 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process returns
> an exit code of 259.
> As described in the bug report, `waitFor()` should not be sensitive to the
> exit value.
> Previously, it er
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:33:05 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> One final question - Now with this change, `Process.waitFor()` won't throw
> the `IllegalThreadStateException` for such programs that return
> `STILL_ACTIVE` exit code. However, looking at the code a subsequent
> Process.exitValue() call
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:50:15 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> On Windows, suppress failure if the total space indicated by `df` is less
>> than `FileStore::getTotalSpace` and the free space indicated by `df` equals
>> `FileStore::getUnallocatedSpace`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:20:39 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Continuing the work initiated by @luhenry to unroll and then intrinsify
>> polynomial hash loops.
>>
>> I've rewired the library changes to route via a single `@IntrinsicCandidate`
>> method. To make this work I've harmonized how they
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 06:04:34 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process returns
>> an exit code of 259.
>> As described in the bug report, `waitFor()` should not be sensitive to the
>> exit value.
>> Previously, it erroneously threw
> Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process returns
> an exit code of 259.
> As described in the bug report, `waitFor()` should not be sensitive to the
> exit value.
> Previously, it erroneously threw IllegalStateException.
> Added a test to verify
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:30:07 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process returns
> an exit code of 259.
> As described in the bug report, `waitFor()` should not be sensitive to the
> exit value.
> Previously, it er
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:23:58 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The code in ObjectStreamField for constructing type signatures should be
> replaced by Class.descriptorString().
> The corresponding change is made in ObjectStreamClass.
> There is no change to the contents of the
901 - 1000 of 1163 matches
Mail list logo
