During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
between documentation and actual behavior in class
com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2d263713c
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:28 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:28 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:11:15 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:27:11 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:27:11 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:27:11 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:27:11 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:27:11 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:45:22 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:17:48 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:39:33 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> com
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:57:23 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> c
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:46:18 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> Currently, it is hard to distinguish what part of the test responsible for
> [JDK-8314063](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314063) testing, and which
> part is for [JDK-8325579](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325579). I
> wou
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:28:37 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> Hm, I think the test was overpurposed already.
This test was added by JDK-8314063 fix, and I do not think it was change after
that.
> Creating another test file with duplicating code does not sound too good
> IMHO. Maybe it is acc
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:26:18 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>>> Currently, it is hard to distinguish what part of the test responsible for
>>> [JDK-8314063](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314063) testing, and
>>> which part is for
>>> [JDK-8325579](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325579
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:38:19 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> As for the test, I had a closer look now and I find it hard to separate
> testing of [JDK-8314063](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314063) from
> [JDK-8325579](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325579). Furthermore, most
> of
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:30:09 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> Thanks for exploring the possibility of improving tracebility of test
> invocations to reported bugs.
>
> >
I've given this test change a second thought, maybe you can try to separate the
test into two separate test classes? One possib
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:44:14 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSo
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:02:45 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> > Thanks for exploring the possibility of improving tracebility of test
> > invocations to reported bugs.
> > >
>
> I've given this test change a second thought, maybe you can try to separate
> the test into two separate test classes? On
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:42:09 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional
>> comm
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:38:24 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> src/java.naming/share/classes/module-info.java line 42:
>>
>>> 40: * The value of this environment property specifies the
>>> fully
>>> 41: * qualified class name of the socket factory used by the LDAP
>>> provider.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:37:59 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> > > Thanks for exploring the possibility of improving tracebility of test
> > > invocations to reported bugs.
> > > >
> >
> >
> > I've given this test change a second thought, maybe you can try to separate
> > the test into two separa
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 21:59:54 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 21:59:54 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:01:34 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 12 additional
>> com
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:09:18 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 12 additional
>> com
> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
> between documentation and actual behavior in class
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createSocket](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3ebe6c192a5dd5cc46ae2
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:19:38 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:19:38 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> During analysing a customer case I figured out that we have an inconsistency
>> between documentation and actual behavior in class
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection. The [method documentation of
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection::createS
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:02:45 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>>> As for the test, I had a closer look now and I find it hard to separate
>>> testing of [JDK-8314063](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314063) from
>>> [JDK-8325579](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325579). Furthermore,
>>> mos
38 matches
Mail list logo
