[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

>Lots of things I could but will not volunteer to. I have every reason >to believe any party requesting amd/bettong to be maintained, and >having access to such board, has designed and potentially manufactured >some custom board based on that particular reference design. Yet I >have not seen this

[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

>Checkout a commit before a0a50775. We (or at least I) want to have a >reference boot loaded into board-status for amd/bettong first. Hi Kyösti, I've checkout f77f2c79c2bb898c123ffe89a0bd1acb5362afc5 and the board doesn't boot. The boot log I get is: coreboot-4.11-127-gf77f2c7-dirty Wed Nov 27

[coreboot] Re: Sandybridge-M help request in setting up LVDS panel.

Hi Jorge, On 03.12.19 15:13, Jose Trujillo wrote: >>> This is my first try in booting coreboot on a LVDS panel. >>> This is a Sandybridge-M system using video option ROM and VBT extracted >>> from the original FW. >> >> if you ever want to get open-source gfx init running instead, let me know.

[coreboot] AMD AGESA board removals

Hi Regarding the deprecation of AGESA platforms due to ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK. As of 3rd December there is active development, while not much testing yet, only for the following AGESA platform boards: * asrock/imb-a180 * lenovo/g505s * pcengines/apu1 Developers will help people who have these

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hallo Goetz, thanks for that information. I am aware of this bug, but i read that Intel released an PCB level workaround what hopefully supermicro has applied on my new bought board. As i have only one board atm what is now in a "Production System" i am not able to activly test it but for

[coreboot] Re: Sandybridge-M help request in setting up LVDS panel.

HI Jose, Some input inline. Thanks, Subrata -Original Message- From: Jose Trujillo [mailto:ce.au...@protonmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 7:44 PM To: Banik, Subrata Cc: Nico Huber ; coreboot ; Patrick Georgi Subject: RE: [coreboot] Sandybridge-M help request in setting up

[coreboot] Re: Sandybridge-M help request in setting up LVDS panel.

HI Jorge, Some inputs inline. Thanks, Subrata -Original Message- From: Nico Huber [mailto:nic...@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 3:34 AM To: Jose Trujillo ; coreboot Cc: Banik, Subrata ; Patrick Georgi Subject: Re: [coreboot] Sandybridge-M help request in setting up LVDS

[coreboot] Intel CPU C2000(Rangeley)/C3000(Denverton)/D-1500(Broadwell-DE) supported in coreboot?

Hi Sir, As you listed that motherboards supported in coreboot. https://coreboot.org/status/board-status.html May we know that when can support Intel CPU C2000(Rangeley)/C3000(Denverton)/D-1500(Broadwell-DE) in coreboot? Thanks. BR, Ivan Yang [Accton] Senior BIOS Engineer Tel: +886 3 5770270

[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:35 PM Michal Zygowski wrote: > > I think Kyösti could share a little bit more details on that (commit > 55fffa29c23). Lots of things I could but will not volunteer to. I have every reason to believe any party requesting amd/bettong to be maintained, and having access to

[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

First of all there is not even a single board status entry for bettong. Please upload one from the commit Kyösti pointed. Regarding the AMD_S3_SAVE, see coreboot/src/vendorcode/amd/pi/00660F01/AMD.h line 129 and later: /* When AMD rolled out CarrizoPI, they made a bad choice of removing  * an

[coreboot] Re: Sandybridge-M help request in setting up LVDS panel.

Hello Friends > > Hello All! > > This is my first try in booting coreboot on a LVDS panel. > > This is a Sandybridge-M system using video option ROM and VBT extracted > > from the original FW. > > if you ever want to get open-source gfx init running instead, let me know. It > would only need a

[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:58 PM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo wrote: > > >Here is a short guide how to upload board status: > > > >https://github.com/coreboot/coreboot/blob/master/util/board_status/README > > > >The system you are going to boot has to have cbmem installed. > > Hi Michal, > > Do you

[coreboot] Re: AMD binaryPI board removals

>Here is a short guide how to upload board status: > >https://github.com/coreboot/coreboot/blob/master/util/board_status/README > >The system you are going to boot has to have cbmem installed. Hi Michal, Do you have already any patch to test? I've updated to the last git and enabled the AMD

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hi Kinky, > i sadly had to replace KGPE-d16 board for my fileserver to a Supermicro > A1SRi-C2558 because of electric pill > > investigating a bit with intelmetool and mecleaner non of them could > found any sign for an ME-region in this board.. so i asking myself if > there is no

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

> investigating a bit with intelmetool and mecleaner non of them could > found any sign for an ME-region in this board.. so i asking myself if > there is no ME/SPS on the intel C2000 socs, what would make them a DAMN > SEXY platform to port coreboot too. > I believe that the Intel FSP (firmware

[coreboot] Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hello folks i sadly had to replace KGPE-d16 board for my fileserver to a Supermicro A1SRi-C2558 because of electric pill investigating a bit with intelmetool and mecleaner non of them could found any sign for an ME-region in this board.. so i asking myself if there is no ME/SPS on the