Dear Jonathan,
Am 05.11.21 um 20:05 schrieb Jonathan Zhang:
We now have the first commercially available coreboot solution for
servers based on Intel Xeon-SP processor (specifically CooperLake
Scalable Processor).
These are great news. (As always a nit: Cooper Lake-SP ;-))
WW OCP DeltaLake
Hi Nico,
One thing that's unclear to me is if there are lingering technical reasons
for holding the patch back, aside from a Kconfig variable that Michael
recently requested. Werner asked that question as well but the answer(s),
if any, seem to have been lost in the philosophical aspects.
If the p
This is awesome! Thanks for sharing, and keep up the great work!
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 12:06 PM Jonathan Zhang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We now have the first commercially available coreboot solution for
> servers based on Intel Xeon-SP processor (specifically CooperLake
> Scalable Processor).
>
> WW OC
On 08.11.21 19:38, Martin Roth wrote:
>
> Nov 7, 2021, 04:29 by nic...@gmx.de:
>
>> On 07.11.21 00:15, Martin Roth wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Nov 6, 2021, 05:49 by nic...@gmx.de:
>>>
It also seems that you underestimate the individuals in the
community.
>>> I don't understand your statement
On 08.11.21 19:57, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Am So., 7. Nov. 2021 um 12:29 Uhr schrieb Nico Huber :
>
>> There's also a general reluctance to expect to support a project with
>> free software that has shown that it doesn't take the GPL seriously.
>>
>
> General reluctance by whom? I just don't see th
Dear Martin,
Am 08.11.21 um 19:38 schrieb Martin Roth:
Nov 7, 2021, 04:13 by nic...@gmx.de:
On 07.11.21 00:11, Martin Roth wrote:
CB:55367 was pushed on June 9th. It's 5 months later. Intel
hasn't been able to get it merged yet. Sure, we're not outright
saying they can't get it in, but
Dear Martin,
Am 05.11.21 um 18:15 schrieb Martin Roth:
Nov 4, 2021, 05:24 by pmen...@molgen.mpg.de:
On 20.10.21 14:24, Nico Huber wrote:
My proposal: How about we set up some guidelines how to proceed
when adding support for a new platform that requires any blobs?
My vague idea is as follow
Am So., 7. Nov. 2021 um 12:29 Uhr schrieb Nico Huber :
> There's also a general reluctance to expect to support a project with
> free software that has shown that it doesn't take the GPL seriously.
>
General reluctance by whom? I just don't see that, instead I see tons of
activity by a very diver
Thank you. I was looking on the german Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org.Regards,Bernd Originalnachricht Betreff: [coreboot] Re: Installing coreboot with SeaBIOSVon: Nico Huber An: bernd...@web.deCc: coreboot@coreboot.orgOn 08.11.21 19:15, bernd...@web.de wrote:> Hi. Is the SeaBIOS
Nov 7, 2021, 04:13 by nic...@gmx.de:
> On 07.11.21 00:11, Martin Roth wrote:
>
>> CB:55367 was pushed on June 9th. It's 5 months later. Intel hasn't been
>> able to get it merged yet. Sure, we're not outright saying they can't get
>> it in, but in effect, that's what's happening.
>>
> Yes, 5
Nov 7, 2021, 04:29 by nic...@gmx.de:
> On 07.11.21 00:15, Martin Roth wrote:
>
>>
>> Nov 6, 2021, 05:49 by nic...@gmx.de:
>>
>>> It also seems that you underestimate the individuals in the
>>> community.
>>>
>> I don't understand your statement that patrick is underestimating the
>> individuals
On 08.11.21 19:15, bernd...@web.de wrote:
> Hi. Is the SeaBIOS payload open source, actually?
Yes.
> I have looked for SeaBIOS on
> Wikipedia but it has no entry of its own.
Please look closer [1].
Nico
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaBIOS
___
c
Hi. Is the SeaBIOS payload open source, actually? I have looked for SeaBIOS on Wikipedia but it has no entry of its own. On Wikipedia's coreboot website SeaBIOS is mentioned, though but there's no statement whether or not it's open source.Regards,Bernd___
It's fine that there are more than 2 lines. In general, there would only be two
lines if you configure coreboot exactly the same as in the tutorial (and even
then there probably will be more than 2 lines, as was explained previously on
another thread). Anything you do differently from the tutori
Hi Werner,
On 08.11.21 12:24, Zeh, Werner wrote:
> I fully can understand your point of view in this discussion. Unfortunately,
> we do live in a real world with real companies that are business-driven.
> With this sidenote in context the world changes dramatically in this regard.
>
> Your reque
Thanks for let us know the result. But the explanation will be the warm
reboot path will modify the GPIO setting? Or the GPIO setting is floating
at the moment?
Lance
Zhiwen Zheng 于2021年11月8日周一 下午7:31写道：
> Add gpio.c from
> https://u8209486.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=5-2BjrOL6Sde2a9aQLMiEgaLz
Add gpio.c from
https://u8209486.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=5-2BjrOL6Sde2a9aQLMiEgaLzceDV6ek3hr5PekV6loyqk65QWgl6iFUXTzf0xmiYdaz1dP39rwh5BPgTpUyb-2Bsg-3D-3DxXBW_L-2FDzr14mnrsJO5b1wX1hp9b1MAQygl7x-2B74RAaH2cn2wBxw68JrPs9IxSJmJXQAva-2BUY65aZPvVauIf67M-2FgY9v12g9aQMGCk5eA9Kfw56r9XM2u-2FaXeM-2BCATfg
Hi Nico.
I fully can understand your point of view in this discussion. Unfortunately, we
do live in a real world with real companies that are business-driven.
With this sidenote in context the world changes dramatically in this regard.
Your request for an early discussion whether this or that de
Hi. I'm with "Check your configuration (optional step):".I did$ make savedefconfig$ cat defconfigThe instructions say:"There should only be two lines (or 3 if you’re using the system toolchain):CONFIG_PAYLOAD_ELF=yCONFIG_PAYLOAD_FILE="payloads/coreinfo/build/coreinfo.elf""I wasn't using the system
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:07 +0530
"Naresh G. Solanki" wrote:
> Since the hang happens in Linux, can you in some way get Linux kernel log
> to understand the cause like soft lockup or panic message.
>
No.
> Also are you saying irrespective of serirq enable/disable, hang is seen?
>
> UART works p
I just looked at the patch, it does not reenable continuous mode in ramstage.
So what I do is basically the same with that patch, but that doesn't work after
a warm reset for me.
I am wondering whether the gpio configuration of the soc is related to this
issue, I don't have access
to the BWG do
21 matches
Mail list logo
