[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-23 Thread Karl Semich
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022, 11:40 AM ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> We are deprecating ALL boards on oreboot that need FSP, as we took the > >> decision a few weeks ago to drop boards > >> that require blobs on the main CPU (we're a

[coreboot] PS/2 connected state and ACPI + BUG(s)

2022-04-23 Thread Petr Cvek
Hi, Observing ACPI on my new ryzen machine it seems its UEFI can generate the state of PS/2 mouse and keyboard accordingly to which one of them is connected or disconnected. I was trying to add something like that to my Core 2 Duo testing setup, but it seems there is no easy way how to export i

[coreboot] [RFC] i945 RAM init failure

2022-04-23 Thread Petr Cvek
Hi, My board Kontron 986lcd-m (i945) sometimes fails in quick_ram_check_or_die() with RAM INIT FAILURE! The failure occurs in about 33% of reboots. RAM modules are fine (multiple memtest checks over the years), used RAM modules are rated with a reserve (DDR2-800 compatible modules and

[coreboot] [BUG] nb/intel/i945: smm_subregion() prints assert when it should not

2022-04-23 Thread Petr Cvek
Hello, On i945 northbridge: ASSERTION ERROR: file 'src/cpu/x86/smm/tseg_region.c', line 31 can be triggered by some configurations. The assert ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(sub_base, sub_size)); tests alignment of SMM base with SMM size. The problem is that IGD stolen memory can offset th

[coreboot] Re: Open letter to Intel regarding the PSE on Elkhart Lake

2022-04-23 Thread Jay Talbott
Yes, nice job Werner! Since you’ve been working on Elkhart Lake, can I inquire if you have booted it to an OS via eMMC and/or iPXE using coreboot? If so, with which payload? Thanks, - Jay From: ron minnich Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 7:02 PM To: Zeh, Werner Cc: coreboot Subjec

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-23 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We are deprecating ALL boards on oreboot that need FSP, as we took the >> decision a few weeks ago to drop boards >> that require blobs on the main CPU (we're accepting PSP blobs for now) > > > Just a quick note that our s

[coreboot] Re: Document branch boards [was: Quark deprecation]

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Martin Roth via coreboot wrote: > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63797 This is great! Do you think we can generate the table for each branch from Kconfig select MAINBOARD_SUPPORTED_ON_BRANCH_* automatically on releases? Initially I also had a concern that maybe column width would need

[coreboot] Re: Kconfig branch boards [was: 2022-04-20 minutes]

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Hi Martin, Martin Roth via coreboot wrote: > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63754 .. > It's not a complete solution, but hopefully it's seen as a step in > the right direction. Thanks a lot for this. I think that this really helps with visibility while guiding people at the same time.

[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Andy Pont wrote: > As soon as they get here I will start testing the various configs > to see what works and what is broken. Many thanks to you and everyone who helped make this happen! //Peter ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsu

[coreboot] Re: Get Coreboot version and build details in linux.

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Putsala Amar via coreboot wrote: > We are working on intel c508 intel denverton board. > We have programmed coreboot image in 16MB NOR flash. > > How can i get the coreboot version and build time stamp details in > linux user mode? Does it creates any sys/proc entry? Investigate DMI and cbmem.

[coreboot] Re: Can coreboot run on a Dell Wyse 3290 or 3030?

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Martin Butt wrote: > Do you know if Coreboot would work on either of these systems? .. > Both the 3290 and the 3030 CPUs are a Intel Celeron N2807 1.58GHz That's the CPU marketing name which in firmware like coreboot doesn't mean much. What matters is that this is a Bay Trail platform. > From a

[coreboot] Re: 2022-03-29 - coreboot UEFI working group meeting minutes

2022-04-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Rudolf, thanks a lot for challenging me and clarifying the problem! ron minnich wrote: > Rudolf's point is crucial: "Challenge accepted. They aren't [self > defining] because they are defined with ABI/compiler:" > > As Rudolf points out, we are defining a binary layout with a c > compiler. That's