See patch
Change real mode API to allow passing intXX number or entry point and
some register values from C.
This theoretically fixes non-vga option roms, but it also allows to use
the same assembler code for option roms and vsm.
It will also make using the bootsplash without yabel a lot easier.
I brought back the GX2 code in to the code at:
svn://coreboot.org/vsa/trunk/gplvsa2
The biggest chunk of code doesn`t affect the LX code.
The resulting LX image is binary compatible with the old one.
But a few lines have to be selected for GX2 only.
I wanted to invetigate how to do that and send a
Hi Stefan,
I tested your patch in the hope that my Geode GX2 board started to work again.
Unfortunatly it doesn`t.
My board stopped working after your vsm loading patches in rev5471.
The error after rev5471 was "hda: lost interrupt" .
Now after rev5532 with your improve realmode api patch the board
Hey Nils,
can you confirm r5470 works with your board?
If so, could you send me a complete boot log with that revision, please?
Which board was that again?
Which VSM module are you using?
Stefan
On 5/8/10 11:15 PM, Nils wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> I tested your patch in the hope that my Geode GX2
Hi,
During my investigations i found this Geode GX2 hardware bug
discription, could that have anything to do with my problems?
Thanks,Nils.
AMD Geode™ GX Processors Silicon Revision 2.1
Specification Update:
1.15 Limit fault during exception in SMM with unreal
code segment
Description: When an
Hi Stefan,
After trying all VSA`s i could find on the net back in
last December, no one was working.
So i hacked up my own.
Attached a log from rev5470.
Thanks,Nils.
coreboot-4.0-r5470M-V5470_142 Mon May 3 23:59:12 CEST 2010 starting...
POST: 0xa0
POST: 0xa1
coreboot-4.0-r5470M-V5470_142 Mo
On 5/8/10 11:59 PM, Nils wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> After trying all VSA`s i could find on the net back in
> last December, no one was working.
> So i hacked up my own.
>
How?
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On 5/9/10 12:46 AM, Nils wrote:
> I brought back the GX2 code in to the code at:
> svn://coreboot.org/vsa/trunk/gplvsa2
> The biggest chunk of code doesn`t affect the LX code.
> The resulting LX image is binary compatible with the old one.
> But a few lines have to be selected for GX2 only.
> I wan
Op zondag 9 mei 2010 00:41:06 schreef u:
> > Attached a log from rev5470.
>
> cool thanks...
> could you send one for 5471 too, please?
>
Here you go, attached.
Nils.
coreboot-4.0-r5471M-v5471_145 Wed May 5 23:09:30 CEST 2010 starting...
POST: 0xa0
POST: 0xa1
coreboot-4.0-r5471M-v5471_145
On 5/9/10 12:57 AM, Nils wrote:
> Op zondag 9 mei 2010 00:41:06 schreef u:
>
>>> Attached a log from rev5470.
>>>
>> cool thanks...
>> could you send one for 5471 too, please?
>>
>>
Due to a bug in the code there were two functions called chipsetinit()
and coreboot was using the wro
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 5/9/10 12:46 AM, Nils wrote:
>
> I brought back the GX2 code in to the code at:
> svn://coreboot.org/vsa/trunk/gplvsa2
> The biggest chunk of code doesn`t affect the LX code.
> The resulting LX image is binary compatible with the old one.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>> On 5/9/10 12:46 AM, Nils wrote:
>>
>> I brought back the GX2 code in to the code at:
>> svn://coreboot.org/vsa/trunk/gplvsa2
>> The biggest chunk of code doesn`t affect the LX code.
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
