Francis Galiegue writes:
Le mardi 19 juin 2007, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
Francis Galiegue writes:
[...]
Nothing, as far as the server is concerned.
[...]
If you have a problem using your IMAP clients, that's where you should look.
What concrete evidence leads you to believe otherwise?
Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Le mardi 19 juin 2007, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
>> Francis Galiegue writes:
> [...]
>> Nothing, as far as the server is concerned.
>>
> [...]
>> If you have a problem using your IMAP clients, that's where you should look.
>>
>> What concrete evidence leads you to believ
Le mardi 19 juin 2007, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
> Francis Galiegue writes:
[...]
>
> Nothing, as far as the server is concerned.
>
[...]
>
> If you have a problem using your IMAP clients, that's where you should look.
>
> What concrete evidence leads you to believe otherwise?
If the fact that
Francis Galiegue writes:
Le mardi 19 juin 2007, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
Francis Galiegue writes:
> So far, the only successful attempt was with KMail, but I had to use the
quite
> ugly syntax INBOX.firstleveldir.secondleveldir.
What syntax were you expecting to use?
Ermwell, just righ
Le mardi 19 juin 2007, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
> Francis Galiegue writes:
>
> > So far, the only successful attempt was with KMail, but I had to use the
quite
> > ugly syntax INBOX.firstleveldir.secondleveldir.
>
> What syntax were you expecting to use?
>
Ermwell, just right click on the su
