On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:17:49PM -0300, Eduardo Kienetz wrote:
On 7/11/07, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
Hello all,
thanks for all the answers on my request.
I'll definitely use ext3 on our new mailserver.
What about improving SORT and SEARCH in
courier-imap by integrating an indexed search/ordering?
(I think dovecot has something like this)
Regards valli
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:17:49PM -0300,
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and h-tree) or ext4 better?
Any recommendations?
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and h-tree) or ext4 better?
Any recommendations?
I take it you
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with
On 7/11/07, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I take it you use Linux. Go with ext3. Not the fastest, not the best one
theoretically, but THE most stable when you use Linux.
OK. But which one would be the fastest (most efficient)?
Given that maildir++ is small files mostly,
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve performance?
There's nothing much to parallelize. The only operations worth parallelizing
On 7/11/07, Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve performance?
There's nothing much
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
On 7/11/07, Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve
11 matches
Mail list logo
