Okay, not sure if anyone remembers, but I was having
auth problems in the past.
After stepping away from this project for a few weeks,
I decided to wipe the orignal install and reinstall
step by step. Seems that I've made a great deal of
progress, I'm not sure what I missed in the orignal
insta
I'd like to use reformail and/or mailbot to produce "that account no
longer exists" messages, and I'd like them to be formatted as DSNs,
preferably as a bounce. Additionally, I don't want any of the original
message to be included in the bounce.
I've run into a problem, however.
1. "reformail -
No replies yet, repeating a request for help...
Has anyone seen a situation where mail is being delivered (and the
user's POP client can download it) but, even though messages are being
left on the server, when the user connects with sqwebmail, he sees no
new mail. Deleting the sqwebmail-curca
Jeff Potter writes:
What other software expects ">Return-path"?
How would changing > to X- break anything?
It's not going to break anything in Courier itself (save for that
reformail bit). As far as other stuff out there, there are no
guarantees. All bets are off.
I tested postfix -- they sim
Jeff Potter wrote:
Given that the RFCs are vague, and that EVERY server we've tested
(except Courier) supports insanely long line lengths (we tested with
1,000,000 byte-long lines), it looks incredibly bad for us and Courier
that it doesn't work on our system. There's a lot of RFC-enforcing that
> > Haven't tried it yet but I have seen courier password changing plugin
> > here: http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=21
I know of people who have tried a number of these, and couldn't get any
of them to work. I was able to quite easily make Horde's (IMP) password
program change cou
> Haven't tried it yet but I have seen courier password changing plugin
> here: http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=21
>
> Hope it helps.
> David
That is exactly what I was looking for. My only difficulty now is
getting [1]courierpassd to work with Debian. I submitted an RFP (bug
#2446
Given that the RFCs are vague, and that EVERY server we've tested
(except Courier) supports insanely long line lengths (we tested with
1,000,000 byte-long lines), it looks incredibly bad for us
and Courier
that it doesn't work on our system. There's a lot of
RFC-enforcing that
I'm willing to argue
What other software expects ">Return-path"?
How would changing > to X- break anything?
It's not going to break anything in Courier itself (save for that
reformail bit). As far as other stuff out there, there are no
guarantees. All bets are off.
I tested postfix -- they simply strip spurious Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dear jeff,
> Given that the RFCs are vague, and that EVERY server we've tested
> (except Courier) supports insanely long line lengths (we tested with
> 1,000,000 byte-long lines), it looks incredibly bad for us
> and Courier
> that it doesn't work on
Anyway, how do they get 5000 characters on a line? They must be trying
hard, as I rarely send emails with anything near that amount of
characters, and any decent email client linewraps at 80-100
characters, even hotmail! Exactly what client are they using, and what
are they trying to do?
I hav
2.1.1. Line Length Limits
There are two limits that this standard places on the number of
characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than
998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding
the CRLF.
And the next paragraph reads:
The 998 character l
It is significant that the rfc says, "the body is simply a sequence of
characters", rather than a sequence of lines. This could be
interpreted
to mean that the body has no line length.
Exactly. I'd never write software that spit out huge lines myself, but
I'm having a really hard time explai
On Friday 07 May 2004 21:31, Chris Petersen wrote:
> I just noticed these in my maillog. After a quick google search, I see
> that I need to have fam installed (it is) and running (according to
> chkconfig it's set up to run via xinetd). Problems still persisting.
> portmap is running just fine,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would have thought that the following section 2.1.1 would have
clarified this.
No, it doesn't.
Well, 2.1 says:
Messages are divided into lines of characters. A line is a series of
characters that is delimited w
Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have thought that the following section 2.1.1 would have
> clarified this.
No, it doesn't.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motor
Hello,
You could find several answers to your question by searching the list.
You did not also specify the distro you are using.
Anyway, what I have done in my RH9 after suggestion from courier mailing
list is this:
rpm -Uvh openssl-perl-0.9.7a-2.i386.rpm
After that, c_rehash emerged in /usr/b
17 matches
Mail list logo
