RH7.3, Dell, Courier 40.1 seems to be pretty stable for us, the
start time for the processes speak for themselves ("2002"):
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uptime
12:08pm up 161 days, 12:24, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ps -eaf |grep courier
daemon 17947
Title: RE: [courier-users] Stability of courier-mta
I've been running Courier-MTA for over a year now in a production environment with 30,000 mailboxes. I have very few complaints.
Our system crashed (twice) after adding a faulty CPU and I experienced no troubles with Courier-MTA o
From: Systems Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Does anyone have any experiences with the stability of courier-mta?
> I'm going to set up a mostly-courier system (but with SquirrelMail
> instead of courier's webmail), and the other components appear to
> have been around for a while, and
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Systems Administrator wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences with the stability of
> courier-mta? I'm going to set up a mostly-courier system (but with
> SquirrelMail instead of courier's webmail), and the other components
> appear to have been around for a while, an
On Tue, 27 May 2003, James A Baker wrote:
> > 1. There's a SquirrelMail patch which supports the ACAP protocol, and
> > I'm keen to see ACAP more widely used. For details on ACAP, see:
> > http://dave.cridland.net/acap/
> > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/acap-charter.html
> >
>
>
Ignoring your questions of stability (since I don't use the MTA
portion), and going off topic purely out of curiosity, I'd like to ask
you briefly...
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 20:05 US/Central, Systems Administrator
wrote:
PS. for those wondering why I picked SquirrelMail, there are two
re
