Every now and then, I get a "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report". Now, I
guess there could be some value in that, but almost every time I get
such a report, it's about a module failing in 5.9.5.
5.9.5 was a development release leading up to 5.10.0. It had issues.
Of course there will be failures.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:13:10PM +0200, Ingo Lantschner wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting many reports about failed tests of my module Backup-
> SingleFile 0.02. The test fail because the testing system could not
> find SUPER.pm in @INC. Especially linux-systems fail. I also note this
> part in th
Hi Abigail,
> Every now and then, I get a "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report". Now, I
> guess there could be some value in that, but almost every time I get
> such a report, it's about a module failing in 5.9.5.
The mailer isn't intelligent enough to know what perls it should or
shouldn't tell yo
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:16:27PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
> Hi Abigail,
>
> > Furthermore, the complete report repeatedly suggests a resource,
> > http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes, to use for suggesting
> > getting FAIL reports. However, the entire grango.org domain seems
> > to be no
