Re: I see only two CPAN-Testers reports on the server from the many I have sent - what is wrong?

David, Thanks for the clarification. Since I there is no longer the direct mirror of cpan-testers responses, I think "wait and see" is the best I can do for diagnostics. One other question: if a module lists a developers release of another module as a requirement, will CPAN or CPANPLUS try to b

FYI: CPAN Testers Reports not showing

For example: http://www.cpantesters.org/distro/O/OpenGL.html?grade=1&perlmat=1&patches=1&oncpan=2&distmat=1&perlver=ALL&osname=ALL On Firefox I get nothing. On IE I get an error but still nothing. Regards, Chris

Re: I see only two CPAN-Testers reports on the server from the many I have sent - what is wrong?

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Chris Marshall wrote: > One other question: if a module lists a developers > release of another module as a requirement, > will CPAN or CPANPLUS try to build the module (even > though it is not a stable release, or will some sort > of error (or worse, no informatio

Re: FYI: CPAN Testers Reports not showing

Hi Chris, > For example: > > http://www.cpantesters.org/distro/O/OpenGL.html?grade=1&perlmat=1&patches=1&oncpan=2&distmat=1&perlver=ALL&osname=ALL > > On Firefox I get nothing. On IE I get an error but > still nothing. There seems to be a problem with getting the page data for that distro. Not s

Re: FYI: CPAN Testers Reports not showing

Hi Chris, Bug found and fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience :( Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers Memoirs Of A Roadie CPAN Testers Blog YAPC Conference Surveys

Re: I see only two CPAN-Testers reports on the server from the many I have sent - what is wrong?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 07:28:03AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Unless the toolchain is updated to allow *distributions* and not > *modules* to be listed as prerequisites, this is pretty much the best > that can be done. (Barring a "development" packages index, which > would probably be an option

Re: I see only two CPAN-Testers reports on the server from the many I have sent - what is wrong?

> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:28:03 -0400, David Golden said: > Unless the toolchain is updated to allow *distributions* and not > *modules* to be listed as prerequisites, this is pretty much the best > that can be done. (Barring a "development" packages index, which > would probably be a

Re: Distro Prefs

> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:04:45 +0200, Steffen Schwigon > said: > My follow-up question: > Your personal "example" distroprefs files (which I often use > regardless of the warning :-)) are contained in the CPAN.pm > distribution but not installed. > Can you arrange that they a

Class::MOP version 0.94 required--this is only version 0.88

Whoa there, I cannot understand what's the history of this tester's perl. But it has happened on more than one setup that test on a module yield a FAIL due to some dependency chain combined with some history of this perl installation (or so it seems). http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.tester

Re: Class::MOP version 0.94 required--this is only version 0.88

Andreas J. Koenig wrote: I cannot understand what's the history of this tester's perl. But it has happened on more than one setup that test on a module yield a FAIL due to some dependency chain combined with some history of this perl installation (or so it seems). http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/p