On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:
>> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html
>> > I therefore mus
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:
> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html
> > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.
> Yes, we're suffering already
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:23:16AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Barbie wrote:
> >> Does redirecting the MSN bot to the static site help at all? (I
> >> though the issue was that spidering the site triggers page
> >> regeneration.)
> >
> > They are able to index th
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Barbie wrote:
>> Does redirecting the MSN bot to the static site help at all? (I
>> though the issue was that spidering the site triggers page
>> regeneration.)
>
> They are able to index the static site already, as that's at
> static.cpantesters.org, a completely
> You mean a list like:
>
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/wpcent.html
>
I think not. I think that list shows recent popular failures. What I
want: for example, imagine a module does great web scraping when it is
released, then the pages change and the scraper fails, and the
well-written tests fail
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:15:17AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Barbie wrote:
> > I have had an apology from the Bing representative, and I've said that I
> > will only remove the ban once I see evidence that the bot is being more
> > responsible. I have only banne
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> it might be useful if the CPAN Testers results would affect the
> search.cpan.org results page more directly. Both the display and
> the ranking of results could use the aggregate reports.
I would support seeing CPAN Testers scores in
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Barbie wrote:
> I have had an apology from the Bing representative, and I've said that I
> will only remove the ban once I see evidence that the bot is being more
> responsible. I have only banned it from www.cpantesters.org, all the
> other sites are unaffected. T
* Nigel Horne [2010-01-19 11:20]:
> Can we bring pressure to bear on the CPAN maintainers?
That doesn’t sound like a good idea to me. I would prefer that
people create modules because they want to, and high-quality
modules because they want to, not because they’ll be kicked out
of the club if the
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:34:52AM -0500, M W487 wrote:
> I tend to agree with all your points, but want to encourage more discussion.
>
> 2010/1/19 Burak Gürsoy :
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Nigel Horne [mailto:n...@bandsman.co.uk]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:23 PM
> >>
To anyone who may have got caught up in the flak after I posted about
the MSNBot, my apologies. Admittedly I shouldn't perhaps have been so
emotional about it, but what is done is done.
However, it seems that although I may have initiated the discussion,
we are far from being the only ones sufferi
I tend to agree with all your points, but want to encourage more discussion.
2010/1/19 Burak Gürsoy :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nigel Horne [mailto:n...@bandsman.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:23 PM
>> To: cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org
>> Subject: Unsupported CPAN Module
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Horne [mailto:n...@bandsman.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:23 PM
> To: cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org
> Subject: Unsupported CPAN Modules
> a) Users should be warned when attempting to download/install
Bad idea. Some Catalyst fanboi is spammi
Nigel Horne schrieb:
Is there something we can do about unsupported CPAN Modules, for example
HTML::FormatData? That module hasn't been updated since 2005, and it's
not because it works and needs no updating, because it doesn't work.
...
a) Users should be warned when attempting to download/
Is there something we can do about unsupported CPAN Modules, for example
HTML::FormatData? That module hasn't been updated since 2005, and it's
not because it works and needs no updating, because it doesn't work.
There are plenty of old modules like that out there.
Can we bring pressure to b
15 matches
Mail list logo
