Tim Couper wrote:
I'm trying to boost-python a vector-of-vectors, like
class A
{
public
A(const std::vector>& my_array);
};
and would intuitively write the wrapper:
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo)
{
using namespace boost::python
class_("A")
.def(init(std::vector >())
;
but get the error
I'm trying to boost-python a vector-of-vectors, like
class A
{
public
A(const std::vector>& my_array);
};
and would intuitively write the wrapper:
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo)
{
using namespace boost::python
class_("A")
.def(init(std::vector >())
;
but get the error "a call to a const
> I haven’t done any linking at this point – I am
just trying to compile.
Yep, but the compiler has predefined macros defined, and the auto_link
header tries to prevent linking / crashing problems.
You should try to compile using an addition /MD switch to use the
dynamically linked C-runtime.
This is great, I will try this, but I'm afraid about the size,
because my main problem with boost.python is the library size compared
to others c++ python bindings, my current library has 16 MB compared
to 5 MB from SIP, and in my bindings I have a lot of overload
functions and this solution can p
Am Mittwoch, 06. Januar 2010 14:10:02 schrieb Renato Araujo:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Hans Meine wrote:
> > But only if you pass objects that need to be converted, right?
>
> Yes but this is the user level I would like to avoid this.
Ah, you fear users saying "PySide is slow" because the
Ravi wrote:
On Friday 06 November 2009 14:52:49 troy d. straszheim wrote:
Currently, the converter type still leaks out to python in the signature:
class S(Boost.Python.instance)
| add(...)
| add( (S)arg1, (object)arg2) -> None :
|
| C++ signature :
Renato Araujo wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying use the "implicitly_convertible" to specify to boost.python
the possible conversions for every type, but I start get some errors
in my functions call because, the boost.python accept conversions in
more then one level. Like in this code:
The boost.pytho
Hi thanks for you help,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Hans Meine wrote:
> On Dienstag 05 Januar 2010, Renato Araujo wrote:
>> I would like to know if is possible to avoid this level of conversion
>> and tell to boost.python only try the direct conversion,
>
> Not as far as I know.
>
>> because
Hello Terry,
Try this:
.sconf_temp\conftest_4.cpp:
#define BOOST_PYTHON_DYN_LINK
#include "boost/python.hpp"
This will make boost look for shared library in the autolink feature
Si
On 06/01/2010 06:50, terry.rank...@csiro.au wrote:
I have compiled boost, and now want to use it in m
On Dienstag 05 Januar 2010, Renato Araujo wrote:
> I would like to know if is possible to avoid this level of conversion
> and tell to boost.python only try the direct conversion,
Not as far as I know.
> because this
> make the functions call slower then normal calls,
But only if you pass objec
10 matches
Mail list logo
