Quoting Ray Dillinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Faustine wrote:
>
>
> >Forensic Stylistics / by G. R. McMenamin ISBN: 0444815449
> >Elsevier Science 07/01/1993 264 pages
>
> I'm unable to find any pointers to this one. Amazon has evidently
> never heard of it. Do yo
l Message-
> | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim May
> | Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 19:00
> | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Subject: CDR: Re: A little help.
> |
> |
> | At 6:40 PM -0700 5/14/01, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> | >On Mon
There is a workbook that goes with the text...
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Faustine wrote:
> > >Forensic Stylistics / by G. R. McMenamin ISBN: 0444815449
> > >Elsevier Science 07/01/1993 264 pages
God was my co-p
At 6:40 PM -0700 5/14/01, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2001, Faustine wrote:
>
> >Forensic Stylistics / by G. R. McMenamin ISBN: 0444815449
>>Elsevier Science 07/01/1993 264 pages
>
>I'm unable to find any pointers to this one. Amazon has evidently
>never heard of it. Do you have any mo
More search terms:
"forensic linguistics, psycholinguistics, authorship identification, speaker
identification, comparative stylistics, forensic stylistics, stylistic
analysis, stylometry, forensic phonetics, and disputed authorship...
psychological profiling, demographic profiling, stylistic
At 11:40 PM 05/13/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>Of course, were I to try to disguise authorship of an article,
>I might sprinkle in a few illiteracies of the current mode:
>
>"Like what do we have to loose? My bad! Lates."
The disturbing thing about such speech is that,
at least to an American spea
At 11:06 PM -0700 5/13/01, Ryan Sorensen wrote:
>Another one I thought of as I was going over my writing.
>The way someone responds to email, at least as far as quoting and the
>spacing between quoted blocks and new text.
>
Hence my point about how somone interested in this problem should
make a
At 11:03 PM -0700 5/13/01, Ryan Sorensen wrote:
>
>I didn't want to have to come up with my own list if someone had done work
>before me.
Past work is overrated.
Or, more importantly, doing your own thinking on problems like this
is much more important than asking others what they think. Richar
* Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010513]:
> At 9:41 PM -0700 5/13/01, Ryan Sorensen wrote:
> >So I get this idea.
> >Crypto is great for lots of things, but anonymous public postings it's not.
> >I know this has been discussed here before, but I haven't seen specifics.
> >
> >
> >What exactly makes
Another one I thought of as I was going over my writing.
The way someone responds to email, at least as far as quoting and the
spacing between quoted blocks and new text.
I'm not sure if this is getting closer to the methods of reading things like
the User-Agent string or not, and losing the ge
* Jim Windle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010513]:
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2001 21:41:06 Ryan Sorensen wrote:
> >
> >Any help is appreciated.
> >Including pointers to online resources or past >discussions, if they have any
>specifics.
> >
> The discussions in the back issues of "Cryptologia", which cite ot
At 9:41 PM -0700 5/13/01, Ryan Sorensen wrote:
>So I get this idea.
>Crypto is great for lots of things, but anonymous public postings it's not.
>I know this has been discussed here before, but I haven't seen specifics.
>
>
>What exactly makes a person's writing style distinctive?
>
>Is it distinc
12 matches
Mail list logo