Re: [Crm-sig] Fwd: Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Robert Casties
Dear Pierre, On 27.10.17 17:21, Florian Kräutli wrote: > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *Pierre Choffé > *Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies* >> >> Dear Florian, dear Christian-Emil, >> >> I hope this finds you well. Just a few words about this interesting >>

Re: [Crm-sig] Fwd: Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Robert Casties
Dear CRMers, I am working on the Islamic Scientific Manuscript Initiative (ISMI ) database with Florian Kräutli but I just joined the mailing list. Please find my comments below: On 27.10.17 17:21, Florian Kräutli wrote: > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From:

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Pierre Choffé
Happy to help (and I hope Christian-Emil agrees !) I’d be interested to see the final result :) Have a nice day, Pierre On Fri 27 Oct 2017 at 11:39 "Florian Kräutli" < ">"Florian Kräutli" > wrote: > > Great! I think we can work with that. I'll let you know how we proceed. > Thank you both for

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Florian Kräutli
Great! I think we can work with that. I'll let you know how we proceed. Thank you both for your help! Florian > On 27. Oct 2017, at 11:37, Pierre Choffé wrote: > > > Yes, a P46_is_composed_of could link the F5 (codex) to its parts F5 > (manuscripts). > > Pierre > > On Fri 27 Oct 2017 at

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Pierre Choffé
Yes, a P46_is_composed_of could link the F5 (codex) to its parts F5 (manuscripts). Pierre On Fri 27 Oct 2017 at 11:28 "Florian Kräutli" < ">"Florian Kräutli" > wrote: > > Dear Pierre, > > > many thanks for this! I think seeing this as two processes makes sense. > > > I sketched your

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Florian Kräutli
Dear Pierre, many thanks for this! I think seeing this as two processes makes sense. I sketched your description as I was reading along: https://photos.app.goo.gl/Xhd6yxZEpQldwqHK2 Is that correct? The part where we struggled in our own scheme is

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Pierre Choffé
Dear Florian, dear Christian-Emil, I hope this finds you well. Just a few words about this interesting discussion if I may. If I understand well:  * the codices we are talking about are collections  of manuscripts * there can be multiple versions of the same codex * there can exist other

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling bound manuscript copies

2017-10-27 Thread Florian Kräutli
Dear Christian-Emil, Thanks for your reply. I will check back on this, but as far as I understood, the manuscripts in a codex have been purposely bound together. There can exist several codices with the same arrangement of manuscripts. I think in this context we could see the manuscripts a