Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling Question: SP5 Geometric Place Expression and D1 Digital Object

Dear George, I believe you are right that nowadays most SP5 will be D1 and have been created in a digital process, lots of times as GPS measurements or derived from digital sources. But it may have been created from analog measurements too, or measured out of a map. Making SP5 isA D1 would exclu

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote ( Issue 508 ): First Order Logic Representation of p170

*YES *Martin* * On 10/6/2020 3:04 PM, George Bruseker wrote: Dear all, In the last SIG, the issue of the accuracy of the FOL representation of P170 defines time (time is defined by) was raised in issue 508 . A better FOL representation was

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote: Change of Scope Note E10 Transfer of Custody (Issue 475)

Dear All, I vote *YES, *with a minor correction (verb missing): "In the event that only a single kind of transfer of custody, either the legal responsibility for the custody or the actual physical possession of the object but not both, this difference should be expressed using the property P2

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote: Change of Scope Note E10 Transfer of Custody (Issue 475)

YES On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:47 AM George Bruseker wrote: > Dear all, > > In the last CRM SIG (47) we discussed issue 475 > which has to > do with a change to the scope note of E10 Transfer of Custody. R. Sanderson > noted that the sco

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote ( Issue 508 ): First Order Logic Representation of p170

YES On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:08 AM George Bruseker wrote: > Dear all, > > In the last SIG, the issue of the accuracy of the FOL representation of > P170 defines time (time is defined by) was raised in issue 508 > . A better FOL > representation

Re: [Crm-sig] E Vote (Issue 404): Examples for E81-P123-P124

NO The examples are inconsistent with regards to the use of the class numbers, both internally and in relation to other examples. Secondly, the transformation should be physical -- the /use/ of a church as a stable is not /necessarily/ a physical transformation. A clearer example should be select

[Crm-sig] Modelling Problem: Modifying a file, how to represent

Dear all, If one uses the CRM family extensions, then I assume one models a file as a D1. If one uses CRMbase, I assume one models it as an E73. This ultimately means it is an intellectual and not physical object. Intellectual objects in CRM can be created but not modified. Any modification create

[Crm-sig] Modelling Question: SP5 Geometric Place Expression and D1 Digital Object

Dear all, Just a question here. SP5 Geometric Place Expression is to my understanding the class we would use to describe a line, polygon etc. that is created in an information system in order to express a declarative place SP6 that we are using to approximate a real place E53. I note that SP5 is

[Crm-sig] E Vote (Issue 404): Examples for E81-P123-P124

Dear all, In 11/2018 a discussion was started to revise the scope note of E81 Transformation and to change the ranges of its relative properties p123 and p124. In brief, it was argued that the range of the class was too broad (E77 Persistent Item) and that it should be limited to E18 Physical Thin

[Crm-sig] E-Vote ( Issue 508 ): First Order Logic Representation of p170

Dear all, In the last SIG, the issue of the accuracy of the FOL representation of P170 defines time (time is defined by) was raised in issue 508 . A better FOL representation was sought for. MD was assigned the HW. The previous state was: P170