Dear All,
"Thinking of it again", I suggest:
a) The case comparing two instances of E54 Dimension should be a "Data
Evaluation", no more a Measurement.
b) Following the last decisions, we can formulate direct comparative
measurements of two objects or more, such as putting two figurines
Is this relevant:
https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type
It is a draft property in CRMsci:
"O28 is conceptually greater than (is conceptually less than)"
All the best,
Thanasis
On 06/10/2022 14:24, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote:
To add: Thinking of it again,
An even easier example to see that the FOL formalisation is wrong is a stolen
painting with unknown whereabouts. In this case there is a place attestation of
the origin but no (publicly available) place attestation of the move at all,
unless we argue with an implicit "move took place at Planet
