YES
On 01/11/2022 09:53, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason
> that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two
> basic, principled reasons for the proposal:
>
> 1) the class can be modelled
Dear all,
It is the CRM SIG's practice to encode the English label of a class into
the URI of the class itself. We thus find the official URIs of CRM encoded
in each official version of CRMbase on the official website:
https://cidoc-crm.org/versions-of-the-cidoc-crm
e.g.:
http://www.cidoc-crm.or
YES
On 01/11/2022 09:53, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason
that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two
basic, principled reasons for the proposal:
1) the class can be modelled using a mo
YES
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 10:56 George Bruseker via Crm-sig
wrote:
Dear all,
I propose the deletion of the following properties of CRMdig. The
reason that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there
are two basic, principled reasons for the proposal:
1) the prop
YES
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 11:02 George Bruseker via Crm-sig
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason that
> each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two basic,
> principled reasons for the proposal:
>
> 1) the class can be model
YES
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 10:56 George Bruseker via Crm-sig
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I propose the deletion of the following properties of CRMdig. The reason
> that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two basic,
> principled reasons for the proposal:
>
> 1) the property can be
YES
On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 7:15 AM Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> YES
>
> On 01/11/2022 09:53, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason
> > that each should be deleted is listed b
YES
Thank you for writing this up, George!
On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 7:15 AM Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> YES
>
> On 01/11/2022 09:48, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I propose the deletion of the following properties of CRMdig. The reason
c) I have problems with using O28 generally for E55 Type.
Please think of:
Exx Sortable Type
Tentative Scope Note: "This class comprises concepts, instances of E55
Type, that allow for comparing summarily all particulars they classify
to those classified by some other instances of Exx Sortabl
YES
On 01/11/2022 09:53, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason
that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two
basic, principled reasons for the proposal:
1) the class can be modelled using a mor
YES
On 01/11/2022 09:48, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
I propose the deletion of the following properties of CRMdig. The reason
that each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two
basic, principled reasons for the proposal:
1) the property can be modelled using
11 matches
Mail list logo
