On 15/05/2018 20:57, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> In addition to Franco's comments, not all things having a temporal
> dimension are activities. We'll discuss more next week.
> I'd not think results of activities can be activities. Shoes are not
> shoe-making.
>
> We have here two aspec
Dear Richard,
In addition to Franco's comments, not all things having a temporal
dimension are activities. We'll discuss more next week.
I'd not think results of activities can be activities. Shoes are not
shoe-making.
We have here two aspects:
A) the legal declaration or convention
B) the ad
Dear Richard
the case you describe clearly belongs to the category of “fiat spatial objects”
as defined by Smith and Varzi, as opposed to “bona fide spatial objects” i.e.
common physical objects. Smith & Varzi introduce this concept in several papers
of theirs - I am sending you, separately, a
Hi,
Further to my previous question, and following a trawl through CRMgeo, I
have another one. :-)
How should one represent an administrative unit (such as Burgess Hill,
being the entity which is managed by Burgess Hill Town Council) using
the CRM? It's not a place (certainly not as defined in E
