.
Anybody interested in exchanging experiences, thoughts, I am very grateful.
Best,
Gerald
Von: Pavlos Fafalios
Datum: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 um 12:47
An: "Hiebel, Gerald"
Cc: crm-sig
Betreff: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE Implementing .2 Properties in RDF
Dear Gerald, all,
I think we can follo
Dear George,
I agree that often links with properties simplify a more complex entity.
There are complex questions of the philosophical distinction between
relationships and the entities that exist by their own. E-R model and
RDFS differ considerably in this respect. Regarding the question of
Hi Pavlos,
I definitely agree to keep following the PC modelling pattern at this
moment and your RDF description above looks correct to me.
My point was a theoretic one. The spirit should be to come to a conclusion
on this issue given current premises. My comments for posterity not the
present :)
Dear George,
About the PC constructs and, in general, if this is the best method to
implement CRM's properties of properties in RDF (considering Francesco's
email and arguments): I was not involved in the initial discussions, when
the SIG first introduced the idea of property classes for implement
Dear both,
I am more and more swayed by Francesco's argument that every PC property
class hides an actual ontological entity which we are failing to properly
model.
I think in principle what Pavlos proposes is syntactically correct and
insofar as we stay on PC here that is probably the way to go.
Dear Gerald, all,
I think we can follow the same reification approach as we do for the .1
properties.
In this case, we just need to provide the property classes of the domain
and range properties of AP13.2, i.e.:
PC_AP13_has_stratigraphic_relation_to
and
PC_AP11_has_physical_relation_to
T
Dear all,
we discussed CRMarchaeo and are going to make a proposel for a new version in
the next CRM-SIG.
In the discussion we encountered the issue of not having yet a policy/strategy
for implementing .2 properties which means properties related to properties.
We have one of them in CRMarchaeo:
