Dear Richard,
On 12/21/2017 5:38 PM, Richard Light wrote:
Martin,
I'm not sure I accept the idea that strings have an identity, which is
separate from the way in which they happen to have been used, and
which it is worth our while to record by adding new classes and
properties to the CRM.
I
Martin,
I'm not sure I accept the idea that strings have an identity, which is
separate from the way in which they happen to have been used, and which
it is worth our while to record by adding new classes and properties to
the CRM.
Any string value which is of interest to us will be identified a
Dear Richard,
On 12/20/2017 6:23 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Am 19.12.2017 um 12:10 schrieb Richard Light
mailto:rich...@light.demon.co.uk>>:
Introducing a class for context sounds strange to me as it would
indicate that the rest is context-free. Still, it could make sense
in order to have a p
> Am 19.12.2017 um 12:10 schrieb Richard Light :
>
>
>> Introducing a class for context sounds strange to me as it would indicate
>> that the rest is context-free. Still, it could make sense in order to have a
>> possibility to make context explicit in the cases we need to.
>>
> Surely the st
> Introducing a class for context sounds strange to me as it would
> indicate that the rest is context-free. Still, it could make sense in
> order to have a possibility to make context explicit in the cases we
> need to.
>
Surely the statements which we make with the CRM are themselves the
'context
> Am 15.12.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Doerr :
>
> On 3/26/2017 9:29 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote:
>> Dear Martin,
>>
>> this is dangerous territory. Do we need to go there? We may have to open up
>> all sorts of boxes including those owned by language philosophers and
>> semioticians.
>>
>> An ut
On 3/26/2017 9:29 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Dear Martin,
this is dangerous territory. Do we need to go there? We may have to open up all
sorts of boxes including those owned by language philosophers and semioticians.
An utterance is made by someone, surely. But is a title an utterance? It is not
formation value. The
only contraint is that titles are textual strings.
Best
Christian-Emil
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Øyvind Eide
Sent: 26 March 2017 20:29
To: martin
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks
Dear Martin,
th
om (Our #DigitalHistory project)
www.medium.com/@Jim_Salmons/ (my #CognitiveComputing/#DigitalHumanities
articles)
www.medium.com/@TimlynnBabitsky (her #CitizenJournalism/#DigitalHistory
articles)
-Original Message-
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Ø
gs.
Best
Christian-Emil
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Øyvind Eide
Sent: 26 March 2017 20:29
To: martin
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks
Dear Martin,
this is dangerous territory. Do we need to go there? We may have to o
Dear Martin,
this is dangerous territory. Do we need to go there? We may have to open up all
sorts of boxes including those owned by language philosophers and semioticians.
An utterance is made by someone, surely. But is a title an utterance? It is not
purely either or, but is it not more lang
Dear Oeyvind,
I agree with the scope note, given the interpretation we decided. I
wonder however if there is a
deeper issue here:
In Germany there exists the saying that dying Goethe uttered "mehr
Licht" ("more light"). I reused this proposition yesterday, because I
wanted to read a newspape
Dear all,
Here is my homework for Issue 260:
1. E35: Accepted the comment made by Oyvind that the scope note of E35 Title is
misleading, since it refers to something functioning a title, not having the
form of a title, it is decided to keep the Title, to update scope note. This HW
is assigned
13 matches
Mail list logo
