Thanks everyone for your useful input.
In the end, the information that I definitely have and need to connect is
linguistic object A is connected to B, B is the transcription of A.
Sometimes I have creation information but this is not the focus of study.
So in my case I went with
E33 -> P130i fea
Dear George, all,
As Martin pointed out CRMtext surely provide a solutions (there is
indeed a class transcription), however in the past I found myself using
the same modelling that Rob proposed (using P2 instead of P32 on the
activity node)
Best,
Nicola
--
Nicola Carboni
Visual Contagion
Dear Rob, All,
I think this is a question to CRMtex, and Achille and Francesca, which
should provide a general theory of transcriptions.
All the best,
martin
On 7/22/2021 4:59 PM, Robert Sanderson via Crm-sig wrote:
What about:
A a E33_Linguistic_Object ;
P94i_was_created_by Creation .
What about:
A a E33_Linguistic_Object ;
P94i_was_created_by Creation .
Creation a E65_Creation ;
p2_has_type or p32_used_general_technique ;
p16_used_specific_object B .
Rob
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:58 AM George Bruseker via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Just
Dear George
the simplest solution I have used for very basic cases, such as, I want
to assign the transcribed content (without identifying A) to B was: B
(E73 Information Object or E33): P3 has note.P3.1 has
type:"transcription" and the string is the content note. This is the
content. However
Dear all,
Just a general question to the crowd.
Sometimes one has transcribed data of a very simple form.
A is supposed to represent B and it has been copied by someone with the
intention of so doing.
A is a transcription of B
A [E33] is a transcription of B [E33]
This could be modelled numer
