I believe the issue with Jetty is resolved and we are looking to make
another release for you folks shortly.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:15 PM Ondrej Dockal wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>
Open an issue with the project and we can discuss there, not sure the right
balance to strike for that value, thus far we have just told concerned
parties to simply use the previous slf4j versions.
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn
>From the jetty perspective, you don't need to use a slf4j version 2 unless
you're making use of the JPMS features. I believe you should be fine just
running with the older version of slf4j.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 05:58 Sravan K Lakkimsetti
wrote:
> Slf4j version 2 dependency is coming from jetty
Denis,
Is that a hard and fast rule everywhere? Because I get forced to sign on
the jetty.git website repository on git.eclipse.org
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:09 PM Denis Roy
wrote:
> As per the bug, Signed-off-by is NOT requi
Presumably because Eclipse wants control of all Eclipse project web content
to maintain their desired standards, maintain their cookie and data
tracking policies, etc.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:09 PM Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
> &
the
whole thing was under review by the webmaster team for what approach they
wanted to allow and provide support for.
Seems like now is the time for a solid update on where the future of this
is intended to be!
Wayne? Denis?
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 11
I added an action item to discuss on AC call next week.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:33 AM Ed Merks wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I did repeatedly try to get this change, posting arguments such as this
> below (in which I did to remove some ema
on streamlining those
commits, and have a signed off requirement on things more substantial.
Even 'no signed off required for a 5 or less lines' would be an improvement
I think.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:16 AM Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>
&g
deal with signed bundles?
>
> Best regards,
> Torkild
>
>
> > 22. jan. 2021 kl. 20:33 skrev Jesse McConnell >:
> >
> >
> > All bundles must be signed using the EF's certificate. Obvious
> exceptions will be made in cases where signing is impossibl
> *All bundles must be signed using the EF's certificate. *Obvious
>> exceptions will be made in cases where signing is impossible.
>>
>
>> We will be applying this standard to the next release and for every
>> release thereafter.
>>
>> The means by which the simultaneous release participation
where is this information coming from? none of the numbers under the Jetty
project make any sense to me :)
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Marcel Bruch <marcel.br...@codetrails.com>
wrote:
> Greetings cross-projects,
>
> I’d l
?
In that way I think it is fine that CodeEnvy is saying what they are since
there is no clear name from the Eclipse Foundation for their flagship fancy
editor...at least that I am aware of...because to me it just changes every
year.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016
I am not surprised the feature is here, I am more surprised that it is
opt-out and not opt-in.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Pascal Rapicault <pas...@rapicorp.com>
wrote:
> On 6/3/2016 4:39 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>
> I'll add t
I don't think so, they were located in the old nexus repository that
was smoked a few months back...I think CBI has some of their own
recommended parent poms
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Henrik h...@protos.de wrote:
Hi all,
I'm
jetty generally finds this to be the case as well
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote:
Yes. Patches attached to bugzilla are easier.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-10-04 12:25 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 10
that sounds like something that should be cleaned up a la CLOSED/RESOLVED
reminds me of stackoverflow's recent close changes
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2013/06/the-war-of-the-closes/?cb=1
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko
...
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org wrote:
On the flip side, we need to evaluate the benefits of more frequent
releases to
see if it's worth it.
Completely agree. My assumption
But it is quite scary we're relying on individuals performing manual tasks
to get the releases out. I hope that we can automate more of what they do.
The beauty of Maven/Tycho/Hudson is that you can automate everything from
source to download pages. We talk of the big red button, it would be
there are a number of maven plugins that provide this support, we use one
in jetty that scans all our java files at build time to ensure certain
licence block presence.
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
tis a good goal to have :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn
ditto here
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik
konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com wrote:
I can confirm this issue. None of the project summary pages are accessible
due to the SQL issue.
** **
- Konstantin
Ha! someone is getting snarky now :)
Of course I was just about to reply that it certainly wasn't jetty's fault :P
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
That's probably Jetty's fault :P
On 09/14/2012 11:18
download.eclipse.org was what was failing yesterday for us
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
I thought I had, but I guess not.
Do you have a link I can use? Is it on download.eclipse.org
yes, we have seen that with jetty javadoc from the
download.eclipse.org/jetty urls
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com wrote:
I am seeing sporadic cases where the download server returns
to hear more of the theory behind these documents.
They rank somewhat high on the list of things I would like to stop
having to provide. :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
I am sorry
I'll just point out the obvious confusing detail on that page,
In Services Covered:
Tier 2 is _called_ Best Effort
yet in Service Availability:
Tier 3 is actually Best Effort, while Tier 2 is 99%
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM
yep, that is much improved, thanks!
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I've done some edits to (hopefully)
clarify things.
Denis
On 06/12/2012 12:00 PM, Jesse
yep, https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=354756
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:48, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:46 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
heck ideally we could sign with a key that was signed
:)
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:47, David Carver d_a_car...@yahoo.com wrote:
It looks like some of this stuff should be doable using Tycho 0.14 and the
Tycho P2 Extras plugin. Included is the ability to run the various Ant
Tasks provided by eclipse
I am able click around quickly right now..
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:08, Markus Knauer mkna...@eclipsesource.com wrote:
I've got two new problems today... :(
One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am getting our
'Bad
start to finish...not that I know of.
more info on what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' would help
clarify that though
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:08, Winston Prakash
winston.prak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/28/12 11:42 AM
ok...for the record...
if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
immediately jetty's fault.
thank you for listening :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
Hi Folks
a new mailing list for hudson build issues?
how about
hudson-needs-rebooted-ag...@eclipse.org
it could be processed by a script even, after 5 distinct messages from
different addresses it could trigger the restart itself and free up
the webmasters time!
:)
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
not much I can do til the network mess is sorted out, I am switching
our build back to the other machines for now
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:28, Nicolas Bros nb...@mia-software.com wrote:
The Metacity window manager does not seem
\o_
slave 5 - https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/jetty/1766/console - git issue
slave 6 - https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Jetty-RT/job/jetty-8/70/console
- git issue
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 19:18, Webmsaster(Matt Ward)
webmas
And jetty, I think its part of the SOPA blackout, eclipse must be
participating, just forgot to put up the banners..
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:09, Henrik Rentz-Reichert h...@protos.de wrote:
same for
http://git.eclipse.org/c/etrice
so far so good
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:04, Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org wrote:
**
They seem fine to me. Is everybody else back in business?
Wayne
On 01/18/2012 12:11 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
And jetty, I think its part of the SOPA
Is anyone getting reasonable performance from hudson lately? The UI
just seems incredibly unresponsive making the most mundane tasks take
far to long...
If its just me then I'll deal with it but if everyone is having these
issues maybe we can open an issue for it..
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
thanks, am watching that bug now
cheers and merry xmas
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:36, Kim Moir kim_m...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
+1
I see the same issue. I opened a bug, it has been bothering me too.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi
38 matches
Mail list logo
