Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Action Required: 3rd party bundles changed in Platform

Hey! Thanks for the heads-up. I am running into an error that sounds related, but I am not sure where to ask for help. I don’t really understand this and any pointers would be highly appreciated. Execution default-target-platform of goal org.eclipse.tycho:target-platform-configuration:2.7.3:ta

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

Hey! Thanks a lot for bringing this to the wider audience, much appreciated. I added a comment around a somewhat unpleasant consequence of an upgrade to JavaSE-17 as a minimal Java version: https://github.com/eclipse/tm4e/issues/339#issuecomment-1102875590

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

Hey! Quick question: why do those update sites refer to the latest S or R builds AS WELL AS a specific release repo from 2020 ? The content of the latest-S looks like: https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-S"; >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Page 2020-09

+1 Cheers Martin > Am 28.08.2020 um 18:43 schrieb Wayne Beaton > : > > It's not really up to me. > > I suppose that we could think of Eclipse JustJ as something that the package > project pulls in, but it should IMHO have a proper place in the simultaneous > release. It serves us well to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] weird MPC versions causing grief

Hey! Maybe unrelated, but whenever we see reports like this from our users, it is in almost all of the cases a problem with stale cached data. This happens independent of the concrete components that show up as not being found. The solution is to either press “reload” on the update site (in the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Withdrawing Code Recommenders from SimRel

Hey! I would like to point out a (from my point of view quite important) problem with removing Code Recommenders from the packages. If a user opens an existing workspace with an install that does NOT contain the code recommenders plugins, but the workspace got created with an install that cont

[cross-project-issues-dev] massive amount of unresolved bundles in 2018-09 M3 (JEE package)

Hey! When I download 2018-09-M3 JEE package for macOS and run it, I get massive amounts of bundles being installed, but not resolved. Most of these things seem to go back to: org.apache.lucene.queryparser_7.1.0.v20180828-2118 having issues to resolve a package import for “org.apache.lucene.docu

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] 2018-09 M3 EPP packages

Hey! When I download 2018-09-M3 JEE package for macOS and run it, I get massive amounts of bundles being installed, but not resolved. Most of these things seem to go back to: org.apache.lucene.queryparser_7.1.0.v20180828-2118 having issues to resolve a package import for “org.apache.lucene.docu

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [orbit-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

required dependencies too, so from our > POV Guava 15 can be safely removed from Orbit. > > > Martin Lippert ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 20., H, > 20:10): > Hey Mat, > > as far as I remember Buildship will update to Guava 21 (from 15) for the > 2018-12 release. Sounds

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [orbit-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Hey Mat, as far as I remember Buildship will update to Guava 21 (from 15) for the 2018-12 release. Sounds like we can’t remove that old Guava Version from Orbit for the 2018-09 release. Just wanted to point that out, in case that piece of the puzzle got lost somewhere... :-) Cheers, Martin

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Hey! As far as I remember, Buildship uses Guava 15 and did not update to Guava 21 yet. It is planned for their 3.0 release, but I am not sure when that will be released and whether it will be part of 2018-09 or a later release. Cheers, -Martin > Am 01.08.2018 um 21:04 schrieb Roland Grunberg

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with Batik 1.9.1 packaging for Photon - might need to revert to previous versions

Hey! Thanks for the quick update. I must admit that I am quite worried about this. Shipping the final version of Orbit for Photon with a version of Batik that people should avoid using and can cause severe issues when installed sounds really really bad. I am sure somehow this version of Batik w

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] object teams feature patch shows up and breaks Eclipse

Hey! Here is the bug report: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=531586 Hope this can be fixed soon, it is really dangerous for our users… :-( Cheers, -Martin > Am 23.02.2018 um 11:42 schrieb Mickael Istria : > > Hi Martin, > > That can be a serious bug and if this happen for any

[cross-project-issues-dev] object teams feature patch shows up and breaks Eclipse

Hey! I have a fresh Eclipse Photon M5 (Java package) install. When I do a “Check for Updates”, the ObjectTeams JDT feature patch shows up. I have no idea why, since I don’t have anything beyond the plain Photon M5 Java package installed. When I agree to the install/update, the Java tooling is h

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext is broken in Oxygen 1a

Hey! Yes, indeed, we would appreciate it very very much if the fixed m2e version could be included in Oxygen.1a. It affects one of the most important use cases on our end. Cheers, -Martin > Am 07.10.2017 um 04:51 schrieb Fred Bricon : > > We've fixed a pretty annoying issue in m2e[1] caused

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen.1 and JDK9

Hey Jens, Oxygen.1 does NOT support Java 9 development out-of-the-box. You have to install the Java9 support from the Eclipse Marketplace into it. This will change with Oxygen.1a (shipping Oct 11), which will include Java9 support ouf-of-the-box. Hope this helps! Cheers, -Martin > I got som

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] When will Oxygen.1 bits be in place?

Please ignore, looks like I was too early… Looks all good now… Cheers, -Martin > Am 26.09.2017 um 13:34 schrieb Martin Lippert : > > I tried to mirror the release bits a moment ago, but the files in that > release directory are all called “rc4” ?!? > Is that correct? > &

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] When will Oxygen.1 bits be in place?

I tried to mirror the release bits a moment ago, but the files in that release directory are all called “rc4” ?!? Is that correct? Cheers, -Martin > Am 26.09.2017 um 13:30 schrieb Ed Merks : > > Dennis, > > I've generated the product catalog to point at the Oxygen composite > http://downlo

[cross-project-issues-dev] just a FYI - macOS Sierra causes issues

Hey! Just FYI, I investigated an issue with macOS Sierra that affects all Eclipse packages. I am posting this here since I think this could affect potentially many users: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=507328 The bottom line is: If you download Eclipse, extract the file, and star

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] duplicate of httpcomponents.httpclient in Neon?

Hey! Thanks for the pointer to the bugzilla item. I will comment over there. Cheers, -Martin > Maybe because of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=495163 and > because Oomph is built to be compatible with Mars... > > > On 01.07.2016 06:45, Martin Lipper

[cross-project-issues-dev] duplicate of httpcomponents.httpclient in Neon?

Hey! Is there a specific reason why Neon Java und JEE packages (and maybe others too) ship with these two bundles: org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.3.6.v201411290715.jar org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.3.6.v201511171540.jar instead of just one of them? The Neon Orbit repo seems to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Stats on OS being used

Hey! My feeling is that (as long as we ship the main packages for these three platforms) we should keep the quality for all these platforms as high as possible. Means to me that I would invest money into the most problematic (or buggy) implementations to get them to the same level as the best o

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Mars.1 re-spin repository is complete. What is p2Diff?

0/10/introducing-p2diff/ > > That blog post has pointers to the code repository to "git" it ... it is easy > to build, and easy to use. > > HTH > > > > > > From:Martin Lippert > To:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, > Date

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Mars 1 RC4 issue with Buildship / workspace prompt

Hey! Strong +1 for a re-spin. Cheers, -Martin > Am 23.09.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Simon Scholz : > > Hi, > > the steps to reproduce the issue are: > > 1) Install Buildship with the version you want to test > 2) Create a new gradle project > > > > > 3) Go to the "Gradle Tasks" view and run

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Announcing Availability of the Eclipse Mars Release!

Hey David, I am playing around with the Mars release and I have an issue with using the “Install New Software” dialog with the Mars release repository. I filed a bug for this (not sure whether it is in the right category): https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=470912 Is anybody experien

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [eclipse-pmc] Proposed schedule for JDK 9

Hey! > I have the action item to take another look at this. That is great. I got the impression from the meeting with Donald Smith and Mark Reinhold at EclipseCon NA this year that they really would like to solve those issues, if still present. Cheers, -Martin > > Mike Milinkovich > mike.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] jdt.core move to Java 7 BREE

Hey! I am not sure whether this “end of public updates” date reflects what is going on inside organizations. Oracle still offers support for Java6 until Dec 2015, and extended support for Dec 2018. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html#java-commercial-offerings Cheers, -Martin

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] proposal: active eclipse installation count service

Hey, The right answer _might_ be that we permit plug-ins to just send a heartbeat without providing any ability to opt-out. My sense is that this has potential to set off a tremendous backlash. I think the same. That would have a huge potential for a tremendous backlash. Just my 2 (paranoid