[Crosswalk-dev] [Canary][Tizen Common] Crosswalk BAT Testing Report on 11.39.263.0 – BLOCK

Quality Summary --- Crosswalk BAT Testing is blocked again by TC-2127 Fail to install app with 'pkgcmd' on Tizen Common image 20141209.2 New Issue --- TC-2127

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

On 08/12/14 14:08, Pozdnyakov, Mikhail wrote: > Hi, Hi, just two questions: > > Implementation plan: > 1) Add the Tizen appcore-related logic and other functionality from > xwalk-launcher to BP > 2) Make the necessary modifications in Tizen so that it does not rely on the > Shared process mode

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Hello, Once again. If we are considering single process model - yes, I do not see any problem in SMACK. I understood question as referring to shared BP. Sorry. Regards, Tomasz Iwanek -Original Message- From: Crosswalk-dev [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] On Beh

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Hello, My comment was aimed to the fact of removing shared BP. If we have single BP per application then it's SMACK label is fixed and BP do not need to handle anything by itself. Privileges to files are enforced by platform. In actual situation, we have shared browser process. BP is needed to b

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Hello, Could you explain why it is not an option: both processes will have the same SMACK labels. As for memory consumption we made a benchmark which showed that BP sharing does not actually give benefits there. BR, Mikhail From: Tomasz Iwanek [t.iwa..

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 14:55 +0100, Baptiste Durand wrote: > Hi > As the shared model will be removed > I thinks > > It could be also interesting to load only the extension requested by > the application not all extensions at each time (as currently done) That's actually independent of the proce

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Hi As the shared model will be removed I thinks It could be also interesting to load only the extension requested by the application not all extensions at each time (as currently done) BR Baptiste 2014-12-08 14:08 GMT+01:00 Pozdnyakov, Mikhail : > Hi, > > Description: > > The Dual process mod

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Le mercredi 10 décembre 2014 à 14:42 +0100, Tomasz Iwanek a écrit : > Hello, > > Due to security mechanisms on tizen enable/disable dual process is not an > option, I think, as different process model requires much different > handling. > > Other question. > Applying this architecture increases m

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

Hello, Due to security mechanisms on tizen enable/disable dual process is not an option, I think, as different process model requires much different handling. Other question. Applying this architecture increases memory usage by web applications (BP per each app). Has anyone thought of memory usag

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] [Intent to implement] Crosswalk uses Dual process model on Tizen

which options would you like to see? BR, Mikhail From: Hur, Joone Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:19 AM To: Pozdnyakov, Mikhail; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org Cc: d...@lists.tizen.org Subject: RE: [Crosswalk-dev] [Intent to implement] Cros