At 10:24 PM -0400 on 10/19/99, Dan Geer wrote:
> What is it about wanting to change the instantaneous & electronic world
> that generates this sort of time & paper hazing ritual?
The lack of bearer microcash? :-).
Once again, the cobbler's children have no shoes...
Cheers,
RAH
--
"Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:58:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP: [FP] California inaugurates digital signatures - cnn.com
FORWARDED:
--
From: "ScanThisNews" <[EMAIL PROT
[Perry, I don't know if this is worth the list's time, we're getting
into minutiae...zap it if you agree.]
[Nah, I think its of interest. --Perry]
> On a more serious note, when Patel issued Bernstein III, I seem to
> recall a quote where she admonished the government for changing the
> regula
Anyone want to try redistribution in the US? I could order 10-20 copies
from Stefan Brands, assuming he's willing to sell in quantity, and then
handle resale in the US for e-gold or US checks or regular postal money
orders or whatever. If you're interested, email me.
An "international postal mo
At 4:06 AM -0700 10/20/99, Ryan Lackey wrote:
>Anyone want to try redistribution in the US? I could order 10-20 copies
>from Stefan Brands, assuming he's willing to sell in quantity, and then
>handle resale in the US for e-gold or US checks or regular postal money
>orders or whatever. If you're
At 10:35 AM -0400 on 10/20/99, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> No. The complexity of international distribution agreements and
>general stupidity are much bigger factors than cash settlement
>costs. Two of my books are translated into Spanish. The US is the
>second largest Spanish speaking market in th
At 8:51 PM -0500 on 10/19/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FORWARDED:
> --
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 13:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Jane's News Briefs
>
> **
> DEFENCE
> Website: http://defence.janes.com
> *
I thought this would be amusing.
--- Start of forwarded message ---
From: "NewsScan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list newsscan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 11:06:02 -0700
Subject: NewsScan Daily, 20 October 1999 ("Above The Fold")
R
> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:48:28 -0400
> From: Reusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Is there an anonymous contribution protocol?
>
> A couple of months ago, someone (unfortunately, I dont
> recall the name or date) wrote to the New York Times,
> suggesting that all political contributions b
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> "Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
>
> [snip]
I don't don't understand what the big deal is - fraud is fraud, even if
it's in plaintext email. Making digital signatures have the same legal
staatus as physical signatures doesn't change that at all.
-
Before OSR2, Windows PWL (cached password database) files reused the
same RC4 stream for known plaintext and the cached passwords. Someone
exploited this and published code. Apparently, MS has fixed the
problem. PWL files under '95/OSR2 and '98 are protected with a single
RC4 stream whose 128-b
I wrote:
>Resources and passwords don't have to conform to anything; they're
>arbitrary binary strings.
The PWL file is a database of (type,name,resource) triplets; it can
store up to 255 of these; I don't know how long each can be.
--
Mike Stay
Programmer / Crypto guy
AccessData Corp.
mailto:[E
12 matches
Mail list logo
