Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread Enzo Michelangeli
- From: "Ben Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "William Allen Simpson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:09 Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release] William Allen Simpson wrote: Fallout from the early RSA releas

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread William Allen Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I remember you expressing such sentiments on the mozilla security list some months ago. But, there are problems with the OpenSSL license. And not enough crossplatform support. And, I'm a big believer in multiple independent implementations. Ben Laurie

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread Ben Laurie
William Allen Simpson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I remember you expressing such sentiments on the mozilla security list some months ago. But, there are problems with the OpenSSL license. As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At least I can't

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread William Allen Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Ben Laurie wrote: As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At least I can't recall any real problems except "it isn't the licence we want it to be". I was not aware that OpenSSL had changed to be compatible with GPL. And I

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread Ben Laurie
William Allen Simpson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Ben Laurie wrote: As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At least I can't recall any real problems except "it isn't the licence we want it to be". I was not aware that OpenSSL had changed

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread William H. Geiger III
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/18/00 at 02:09 PM, Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: William Allen Simpson wrote: Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there a team of folks doing independent

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread Rich Salz
the OpenSSL project was not accepting code from US sources. Has this policy changed? Yes. The various members of the openssl-core team either agree that the current regulations remove their concern; or feel that even though there are issues it's not worth dealing with now US

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-19 Thread William Allen Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Now, I didn't start this thread to argue about licenses. I just wanted folks to review code, should they be so inclined. So, this is my last comment. Sorry that someone took umbrage. Ben Laurie wrote: William Allen Simpson wrote: I was not aware that

[Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-18 Thread William Allen Simpson
Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there a team of folks doing independent code review? Since this is likely to show up on a lot of systems, and any bugs will plague us for a long time, this

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]

2000-09-18 Thread Ben Laurie
William Allen Simpson wrote: Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there a team of folks doing independent code review? Since this is likely to show up on a lot of systems, and any bugs will