Kelly Miller wrote:
zonjai wrote:
As for this extra line spacing, will designating a line-height value
set up as an IE6 hack work? I have never noticed a difference when
setting up one of those before. Would it just be a simple 1% or am I
thinking of something different?
Zonjai
--
zonj
zonjai wrote:
rel=" stylesheet" <-- Try removing the space before stylesheet. Some
browsers get confused about that sort of thing, and won't load the
stylesheet.
Okay Kelly it worked. I removed the space and it is now displaying in
Opera just fine. In IE6.0 for Win, I am getting the sam
rel=" stylesheet" <-- Try removing the space before stylesheet. Some browsers
get confused about that sort of thing, and won't load the stylesheet.
Okay Kelly it worked. I removed the space and it is now displaying in
Opera just fine. In IE6.0 for Win, I am getting the same spacing issues
Oh, and sorry for not including this in my other email, but upon looking over
the code quickly, I just want to throw this in:
Non-table design does not work exactly like table based design. For example,
that top graphic was three slices in a table, but in CSS, it can be a single
image.
Yep th
Oh, and sorry for not including this in my other email, but upon looking
over the code quickly, I just want to throw this in:
Non-table design does not work exactly like table based design. For
example, that top graphic was three slices in a table, but in CSS, it
can be a single image.
That
rel=" stylesheet" <-- Try removing the space before stylesheet. Some browsers
get confused about that sort of thing, and won't load the stylesheet.
--
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!
__
You also need to put width:100% on your container div to make the white
background show in IE.
Regards
Graham Cook
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luca Balboni
Sent: Friday, 27 May 2005 12:28 PM
To: css-d css-d
Subject: [css-d] Website c
Marc Wolfgram wrote:
The css positioning for the header elements on this site is working
on Mac and Win for all browsers except IE under windows.
ref: http://www.elmbrooklifebuilders.org/
One element is a horizontal img placed just like all the other img
stuff:
Relative css:
In IE6 the top navigation menu items jump all over the place because of the
HEIGHT: 1.9em in the style:
#navigation A:hover {
COLOR: #33; BORDER-BOTTOM: #99 1px solid; HEIGHT: 1.9em
}
Remove this to make it work properly in IE (sorry I can't test for Mac)
Regards
Graham Cook
-
Hello to all, and thank you for this discussion group.
I am having a layout problem. I am working on a site for my new
employer. The main layout and design were already created by the
previous webdesigner and was done all in tables. This is my first
project with this company, and since ther
Christopher Harris wrote:
Thanks Gunlaug - it works! But - how does the float affect it? It
may be retarded to ask - but I'd just like to know why. I know that
the labels and inputs were floating left, but why would they cause
them to bunch up like that?
Floats [Text Box] will always pass
luciash wrote:
cifroes wrote:
Hi, thanks for the quick reply.
I tried putting a large image in the center column in that design.
Right col and center column (and scrollbars) works nicely, as i
wanted... the problem is that the left column has a strange behaviour
"dancing around" when you r
Scott Blanchard wrote:
Please take a look at this screenshot (JPEG):
http://v5.octane8.com/destin/images/x8webtop_images/picture1.jpg
Notice how the bullet images in the sitemap menu on the left are all
mangled?
Here's the actual URL to the page, can anyone else see the mangled bullets?
h
Christie Mason wrote:
Thanks Gunlaug Sørtun, that was somewhat reassuring. As a ending comment, I
would like to say to all those that are going in the fixed direction (CSS or
table or hybrid) that, as a site guest, I REALLY dislike the trend.
Christie Mason
___
Scott Blanchard wrote:
Please take a look at this screenshot (JPEG):
http://v5.octane8.com/destin/images/x8webtop_images/picture1.jpg
Notice how the bullet images in the sitemap menu on the left are all
mangled?
Here's the actual URL to the page, can anyone else see the mangled bullets?
htt
2. The layout is destroyed in IE / Win. The layout utilizes two floats,
to
which I have applied the display: inline feature and the child selector to
attempt to correct the 3px bug. Nothing has solved the issue. Please
help!
Hi, try this...
div#globalnav {
float:right;
border-left: 2px
Larry Israel schrieb:
I am curious to pick the brains of some of you CSS gurus out there about
something. Without going into too much detail, are there facets of CSS
that are coming down the pipe in the not so distant future that
"excite" you?
Although your question might at first seem somewha
I thought about that - but there is a way to do it without as much typing.
I have it fixed now. Gunlaug Sorten replied to me and gave the answer I was
looking for. Basically, one mandatory CSS line and an optional one
regarding the vertical alignment of the word "To". I figure - the less you
I have it fixed now. But, if you leave out float: left; - the whole form
gets stretched vertically, which is not what I want. The reason I need it
compacted is because it fits into a tiny "window" on a home page. As for
display: block. I forget why. I think it has to do with keeping everyth
Thanks Gunlaug - it works! But - how does the float affect it? It may be
retarded to ask - but I'd just like to know why. I know that the labels and
inputs were floating left, but why would they cause them to bunch up like
that? Thanks again.
- Chris
From: Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a general question about H tags (H1 , H2, H3 etc). Does the level
of H tag matter when it comes to Search engine visibility?
This is not a CSS related question. It would be better asked in the web
design list.
http://webdesign-l.com/
--
Bob Easton
Accessibili
On 5/28/05, Christopher Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it's because the labels and the boxes have display: block
Why do the inputs need to be floated (or display:block, for that matter)?
Putting float:left: on only the labels seems to work fine in Firefox.
___
I believe the text between the two text boxes: "To" needs to be
contained within a label tag. It is at present a tag without text. I'm
not sure exactly what that means to the browser, but it seems to affect
the float that you are looking for.
Joel Goldstick
www.columbuswebmakers.com
Christo
Christopher Harris wrote:
The problem: I have a form, and everything is lining up properly
except one line. It's the line with Square Feet: [Text Box] To [Text
Box]. The problem is that I can't get them to line up on the same
line.
http://www.steeloaklimited.com/houseplantrends/formtest.ht
I had a general question about H tags (H1 , H2, H3 etc). Does the level
of H tag matter when it comes to Search engine visibility?
Which are more important (if any)?
Thanks
Adam
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-d
The problem: I have a form, and everything is lining up properly except one
line. It's the line with Square Feet: [Text Box] To [Text Box]. The
problem is that I can't get them to line up on the same line.
The URL is: < http://www.steeloaklimited.com/houseplantrends/formtest.html >
. The C
>> I am curious to pick the brains of some of you CSS gurus out there about
>> something. Without going into too much detail, are there facets of CSS
>> that are coming down the pipe in the not so distant future that
>>"excite" you?
>
> Although your question might at first seem somewhat "theoretic
Hello,
I have a problem under IE with an unordered list. My page is at
http://ivredimages.free.fr/produits.php
In the ul list, the third level is not horizontally aligned. What is wrong?
Also, on this page, there is no vertical border on the right of the left
menu in IE. I do not understan
Time for this lurker to beg for help...
The css positioning for the header elements on this site is working
on Mac and Win for all browsers except IE under windows.
ref: http://www.elmbrooklifebuilders.org/
One element is a horizontal img placed just like all the other img
stuff:
Thanks Gunlaug Sørtun, that was somewhat reassuring. As a ending comment, I
would like to say to all those that are going in the fixed direction (CSS or
table or hybrid) that, as a site guest, I REALLY dislike the trend.
Christie Mason
On May 27, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Theodore Serbinski wrote:
On 5/27/05, Christie Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this true? "all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed
design".
I hope not, but if it is true is it because of the difficulties in
creating
liquid CSS designs, or is the
Christie Mason wrote:
Is this true? "all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed
design". I hope not, but if it is true is it because of the
difficulties in creating liquid CSS designs, or is there some other
reason?
Just take the word "all" out of that sentence, as no switching to
an
Ah, doh!
That is right, needed position:relative
Added that and it worked:
http://www.washsq.com/beta/
(the green bg is just there to make sure it is right)
Image doesn't disappear either on FF or IE6. And I added a margin for
the text to get it to wrap closer to the cables even though it is O
You do know z-index only applied to positioned elements, right?
But regardless, in this case, if you'd managed to get the text over the
image, the image would have disappeared (because the text and the white
background are on the same level). If you give the text a right margin,
you can get i
From: "Syntactic: Jim Wilkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am curious to pick the brains of some of you CSS gurus out there about
something. Without going into too much detail, are there facets of CSS
that
are coming down the pipe in the not so distant future that "excite" you?
I'm no guru, but I
On 5/27/05, Christie Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this true? "all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed design".
> I hope not, but if it is true is it because of the difficulties in creating
> liquid CSS designs, or is there some other reason?
>From all of my research/examples i
Hey Kelly,
Went back to what I originally had (and what you suggested would be
the best course) but here is the problem I was having originally:
http://www.washsq.com/beta/
See that paragraph of text ... I can't seem to get that to be ON TOP
of the image, no matter what I do. I can get that, th
James Duncan wrote:
1. (image) Headline
the HTML is
so far the only result i get is the image bottom aligning with the
baseline of the headline and flowing upwards.
I need the top of the image to align and then flow downwards.
Should work with 'vertical-align: top;' defined on that i
Is this true? "all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed design".
I hope not, but if it is true is it because of the difficulties in creating
liquid CSS designs, or is there some other reason?
I primarily do database interaction so I still use a lot of tables with CSS
where possible.
Ch
Yeah. The trick is you have to make the gradient fade part of the image
as well. Then you have to use margins and padding to keep the text away
from the image.
--
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!
__
Hi Kelly,
Originally I did try this setup (with H2 and UL instead of divs)! The
problem I ran into is that I had to slice up that cable image big
because of the gradient fade. And then my content text was too
short... it was hidden by the extra white space in the image. I tried
z-indexes but no av
Theodore Serbinski wrote:
Hi Kelly,
The entire website is going to be fixed width at 768px ... I know
pros/cons to this but it seems to the most reliable method to date and
all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed design. But thanks
for the tip for using it as liquid.
As for the gra
Hi All
Long time listener, first time caller
Im trying to do something fairly simple, but its not turning out that way
I have an ordered list
within each id like to place a image (not as an image replacement
for the number, and image actually within the content of the LI
itself)
so it woudl r
Hi Kelly,
The entire website is going to be fixed width at 768px ... I know
pros/cons to this but it seems to the most reliable method to date and
all of the top CSS designers switched back to fixed design. But thanks
for the tip for using it as liquid.
As for the graphic of the cables, I think I
Theodore Serbinski wrote:
Well the border part I've figured out... I just have a 1 x 768px image
that is set as the bg for the body this creates the shadow effect
perfectly.
I agree with the title image graphic being an as well no problems there.
But that graphic of the cable, whew still havi
Worked, thanks.
I had finally figured out that it was the use of the italic but I
couldn't come up with a work around except changing to a sans-serif
font and no italic.
Thanks.
On May 26, 2005, at 2:27 AM, Bruno Fassino wrote:
Michael Cassidy wrote:
I have a bar that I want to extend acr
> > http://www.washsq.com/layouyt01.jpg
> >
> You've got a border down the left, which can be applied to the ,
> and a network cable blending into a grid which can be applied to the
> div containing the main content, and a logo/heading image which should
> go in the foreground in an . All the rest
Thomas,
I am curious to pick the brains of some of you CSS gurus out there about
something. Without going into too much detail, are there facets of CSS
that
are coming down the pipe in the not so distant future that "excite" you?
Although your question might at first seem somewhat "theoreti
On 5/27/05, Theodore Serbinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have a new design comp of a new layout for our website here:
>
> http://www.washsq.com/layouyt01.jpg
>
> i'm playing around with the XHTML/CSS but i'm not sure what is the
> best and simplest method for cutting up that graphic and disp
I have done some testing on input type="text" box styling and am a bit
troubled that I cannot find a good solution to my problem.
Say we have a text box:
If I use a style like this (on a windows machine):
input {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size : 9pt;
border:1px sol
Hello,
I would like to add a copyright symbol just to the right of a logo which is
centered horizontally on the page. I would also like the top of the
copyright symbol aligned with the top of the image.
Here is the table equivalent of what I am trying to do (but am trying to
learn how to do thin
Please take a look at this screenshot (JPEG):
http://v5.octane8.com/destin/images/x8webtop_images/picture1.jpg
Notice how the bullet images in the sitemap menu on the left are all
mangled? These are background images attached to the LI elements of the
unordered list based navigation. The really w
> Hey Luci, that's a really neat idea. The nav system I devised when
> quite new to CSS has spacer GIFs with alt attributes, but I've never
> been completely happy with it. Your way is better.
How so? Because it can fail in more than one scenario?
The alternative text is there to
- explain what
> > it's no good way but you can try
> >
> > Alternative text
>
> damn, sorry, it has to be with id:
> Alternative text
In fact, it is a horrible way, as display:none might not be read by
some screen readers.
Check "screenreader visibility" on the Wiki.
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-
On 5/27/05, Rick Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> /*data
> /*]]>*/
>
>
> I thought I was pretty knowledgeable in CSS but have no clue what this is
> used for.
In XHTML and