Re: [css-d] At what point does it become more beneficial to use CSS?

Steve Clay wrote: Friday, September 16, 2005, 12:27:31 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote: in today's broadband world... Ask me when my roommates are using Soulseek! Things can get /much/ slower than dial-up. In today's broadband world here, any local broadband network cell that is full gets speed

Re: [css-d] Stupid Safari css table alignment difference

Marc Wolfgram wrote: There are two identical pages, simple dog pedigree charts. Since the dogs are brother/sister, the data is identical except for the names of the dogs in the page and table tags. On one page the table centers in my internal div block properly, the other page left just

Re: [css-d] Strange mozilla behaviour

andy wrote: The two columns in the centred content shift position to the left by 10px when the content in the content area is longer than the browser window. http://www.amprofile.co.uk/long_browser.html http://www.amprofile.co.uk/short_browser.html Does anyone know why this is happening a

[css-d] Strange mozilla behaviour

I have a problem with Mozilla using a centred two-column design with float and a cleared footer. The two columns in the centred content shift position to the left by 10px when the content in the content area is longer than the browser window. I have a centred footer at the bottom of the p

[css-d] javascript problem with tabtastic

hi everyone! just hoping that someone from this community can help me with a bit of javascript fix with tabtastic( http://phrogz.net/JS/Tabtastic/index.html#overview). see in the markup, an ".active" class is placed inside the tag to indicate that it is the active tag. it's good and all, but

[css-d] Stupid Safari css table alignment difference

One friend's site I've done more for a favor than anything else has this strange table centering problem. There are two identical pages, simple dog pedigree charts. Since the dogs are brother/sister, the data is identical except for the names of the dogs in the page and table tags. On one

Re: [css-d] Unrelated divs seem to be interlinked on the bottom border.

Alan Chandler wrote: Thank you, it works Good ;-) However, I am still stuggling to understand No wonder, as the mechanisms involved are used by many, but have not been well documented anywhere -- until now. We investigated these mechanisms while looking for /similarities/ between a well kn

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On 9/17/05 5:32 AM, "olly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, thanks for the feedback - really appreciated. I'm purchasing a Mac in > the next few weeks so then I'll be able to cover most browsers... Unless you have not uploaded the revised files, the problems are still occurring in IE 5/Mac. Not

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Wow, thanks for the feedback - really appreciated. I'm purchasing a Mac in the next few weeks so then I'll be able to cover most browsers :) Anyway, until then... On 17/09/05, Jono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IE/Mac 5.2.3: > > Home page: > The bottom of the second box - WhistleBump Records

Re: [css-d] Site check please--whistlebump

On 17/09/05, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mac/ie5.2 and Safari screen captures here > . > In XP_SP2 you are drawing a scroll bar at 800 in all my browsers. > Other than that she's 'working' well in XP, albeit unreadable at any >

[css-d] IE table weirdness

Hi, I've been having a weird issue with a table that has a div with a width set in one of its cells in Internet Explorer (and Opera). I think it's best shown with a simple example, so you can view it here: http://devrandom.com/test/tablefun.html If you view the example in IE, you'll notice that

Re: [css-d] Unrelated divs seem to be interlinked on the bottom border.

On Saturday 17 Sep 2005 03:48, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > > The only possible linkage that I can see is through the clearfix > > class, but I don't understand why. Can someone give me an > > explanation so that I can have a clue as how to avoid it. > > You're correct: it's cle