Hello Everyone,
I spent the night tonight trying to make Sliding Faux Columns but with
rounded edges at top and bottom of the columns. Also I wanted it so
the layout can lay on top of a gradient background where the gradient
will 'bleed through' the transparent areas of the rounded corners.
This
On 9/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Wish I had some creative artistic sense. But obviously I need help! I
would appreciate any constructive criticism of this site:
http://www.townlinefarm.com
The Turkeys taste great! They are looking for a 'country - homey'
Doesn't look good in IE, all the text is in a dark charcoal background.
Graham Cook
ph: 0419 316 815
web: www.uaoz.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arian Hojat
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006 5:15 PM
To:
On Sep 20, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
I'm struggling to understand what's wrong with my page border. It
adheres to the browser windows on 3 sides [top, lt and rt] but not on
the bottom, in either Safari or Firefox.
I've tried whatever solutions I could think of but nothing has
I figured out that little side-problem Graham mentioned... When clearing my
floats, the empty clearing div in IE shouldnt have a height of 0px like how
I set, otherwise the floats and background images behind them screw up.
Back to the real problem again with the padding :)
On 9/20/06, Arian
thanks for the great solution.
one question though - why doesn't xhtml 1.1 serve as text/html ?
thanks again
Ido
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Ido dekkers wrote:
http://test3.dekkers.net/sos.htm
firefox and netscape - just do what i say and all works well, IE -
well it's a mess and
Ido Dekkers wrote:
one question though - why doesn't xhtml 1.1 serve as text/html ?
I guess... :-) ...the short answer is that those who wrote the existing
HTML/XHTML standards says so...
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020430/#summary
...and standards wouldn't mean much if
Arian Hojat wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I spent the night tonight trying to make Sliding Faux Columns but with
rounded edges at top and bottom of the columns. Also I wanted it so
the layout can lay on top of a gradient background where the gradient
will 'bleed through' the transparent areas of the
that's exactly why i came here : -)
but as you can see - i'm only starting to grasp the entire stardards stuff -
that's why all these questions ; )
Ido
On 9/20/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ido Dekkers wrote:
one question though - why doesn't xhtml 1.1 serve as text/html ?
I
Hey Franky,
yeh i was looking at my favorate liquid corner tutorial that i had saved on
my computer long time ago, and lone behold it is the website you sent.
The 2nd link i posted in my 1st email is based on that kinda with the
negative margins... but I cannot add margins like that tutorial
Hi,
I am having nightmares fixing CSS files and HTML pages which were initially
designed for
a 1024x640 screen resolution.
I have been playing around with position:absolute, width:100% etc
No luck so far.
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try to make
the files compatible
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try
to make the files compatible for both resolutions (600x400
and 1024x640) ?
First of all, don't design for screen resolutions. It's mostly
irrelevant. What matters are browser viewport sizes, and that can be
anything and everything.
Ido dekkers wrote:
that's exactly why i came here : -)
That's what I thought :-)
but as you can see - i'm only starting to grasp the entire stardards
stuff - that's why all these questions ; )
Keep reading up on that standards stuff - there's plenty of it, and keep
on asking questions. If
On 9/20/06, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try to make
the files compatible for both resolutions (600x400 and 1024x640) ?
I'm assuming you mean 640x480 and 1024x768. But your goal should be
to make pages that work at any (reasonable)
Austin, Darrel wrote:
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try
to make the files compatible for both resolutions (600x400
and 1024x640) ?
First of all, don't design for screen resolutions. It's mostly
irrelevant. What matters are browser viewport sizes, and that can be
it's typo.
I meant 800x600.
Thanks everyone for your advices, lots of work ahead apparently to fix this.
That's just horrible.
Rahul Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Austin, Darrel wrote:
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try
to make the files compatible for both
Mike wrote:
I am having nightmares fixing CSS files and HTML pages which were initially
designed for
a 1024x640 screen resolution.
I have been playing around with position:absolute, width:100% etc
No luck so far.
Does anyone know of good solutions that I could test and try to make
the
I'm assuming you mean 640x480 and 1024x768. But your goal should be
to make pages that work at any (reasonable) resolution, not just a
couple of popular ones. The difference is between static and
fluid or elastic layout design.
There's no one simple solution, but there are several
At 2:24 PM -0400 9/19/06, ~davidLaakso wrote:
tedd wrote:
Best,
~dL
PS Tedd and I are even surlier and nastier to each other off-list.
Yeah, but that's only when we're speaking to each other. :-)
As Oscar Wilde once said -- The critic has to educate the public; the
artist has to educate
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/elastic/
It's kind of ironic that the above site requires a 1000 pixel-wide
viewport :-)
Sorry - just couldn't resist.
Please do. The amount of comments you get as an author about problems
of the site that publishes your stuff is simply staggering. One
20 matches
Mail list logo
