On May 24, 2008, at 3:26 AM, Mary Ellen Curtin wrote:
> I have a 2-cell table I am trying to style with css:
> http://datagnostics.com/test/tablecells.html
>
> What I want is:
> 1. table width is fixed
> 2. cell with image in it is just the width of the image, even if I
> don't
> know ahead of
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
>>> Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of
>>> www.whitehouseinwestbend.com
>>>
>>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css
>>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>
>
> David:
>
> Thanks
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
> Thanks. I set the margins to -2px; and I still lose part of the
> vertical rules in WIN2K/IE6 at work, although the floats stay in
> place. I have changed them to -1px. Would you please take a quick
> look and let me know if 'that' has resolved the issue. Otherwise I
Sohail Aboobaker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need help in testing whether the HTML found at
> http://newwavecell.com/design/Index.html is "skinnable". The goal is to
> accomodate as many designs as possible without having to alter the
> underlying HTML.
>
> The designer should be able to make menus appear
I tried putting a "z-index:50" on #mainnavul and it now works.
The "50" part probably doesn't have to be that specific number, but I just
put some arbitrary thing in there that I figured would be higher than the
z-index of the content. I only tested this in Firefox Mac.
Chris A
On Fri, May 23,
>> Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of
>> www.whitehouseinwestbend.com
>>
>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css
>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css
>>
>> Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always
>>
Hi,
We have a CSS driven drop down menu but we have two issues with it:
a. The options which are falling in the content area of the page, are not
clickable.
b. Some options seem to be hidden under the content.
http://www.newwavecell.com/design/Index.html
Is this something that can be quickly fi
Hi,
We need help in testing whether the HTML found at
http://newwavecell.com/design/Index.html is "skinnable". The goal is to
accomodate as many designs as possible without having to alter the
underlying HTML.
The designer should be able to make menus appear differently (vertical,
horizontal, dro
I have a 2-cell table I am trying to style with css:
http://datagnostics.com/test/tablecells.html
What I want is:
1. table width is fixed
2. cell with image in it is just the width of the image, even if I don't
know ahead of time how wide the image will be.
3. the other cell should adjust its wid
thank you gunlaug - writing in position: relative; to the
problem div in IE 6 worked -
- http://www.fatgraffix.com/2008-test-01/index-fix.html
=fgx=
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/cs
--- James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know why this is happening? I thought I had
> encountered most IE bugs before ... it doesn't
> even seem to be down to the box model differences
> since I've not specified a height on anything.
It definitely looks like a hasLayout problem - this
Thanks, I'll use one of those.
Do you know why this is happening? I thought I had encountered most IE bugs
before, but this doesn't seem to fall under any I've heard of - it doesn't even
seem to be down to the box model differences since I've not specified a height
on anything. It seems that t
Hi Ingo,
That does seem to have quelled the issue, many thanks. FWIW, I applied
display:inline-block to the innerwrapper to trigger hasLayout, and in my
specific case it appears to work. I then created the following rule in
case other browsers had difficulties with it: html > body #innerwrapper
What about adding the underscore hack ?
h1 {
...
_margin-top:200px;
}
That will get the same result in IE6 as the one in FF.
James Smith wrote:
> Hi there, this is hopefully an easy one, but I'm struggling to find a clean
> solution for IE6 without resorting to adding an extra div, floating the
James Smith wrote:
> Hi there, this is hopefully an easy one, but I'm struggling to find a clean
> solution for IE6 without resorting to adding an extra div, floating the h1
> element, or removing the container's width (all of which are inconvenient for
> various reasons) -
>
> Problem here is
Hi there, this is hopefully an easy one, but I'm struggling to find a clean
solution for IE6 without resorting to adding an extra div, floating the h1
element, or removing the container's width (all of which are inconvenient for
various reasons) -
Problem here is that IE6 doesn't honour both
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
> 05/22/2008
>
> Hi All:
>
> Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of
> www.whitehouseinwestbend.com
>
> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css
> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css
>
> Comments regarding ease of use/a
There's another technique at:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/krazy.html
By Stu Nicholls.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List pol
Here's another list of several techniques:
http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/44.php
Best regards,
Christian
*Directmedia Publishing GmbH* · Möckernstraße 68 · 10965 Berlin
www.digitale-bibliothek.de
AG Berlin-Charlottenburg · HR B 58002 · USt.Id. DE173211737
Geschäftsführer: Ralf Szyman
> My body background specific code is thus:
>
> body {
>background-color: #D8BAEC;
>background-image: url(images/bggradient1.jpg);
>background-repeat: repeat-y;
>text-align: left;
>margin: 0px;
>padding: 0px;
>color: #611E41;
> }
Hi,
I had run into a similar issue and
Chris Hardie wrote:
> I've seen a lot, but this is a new one and a doozy:
>
> http://142.177.155.236/test.asp
>
> ...
> Now, click on the "Change alt text of right-hand image" button. The
> left-hand column is now thrown over 375 pixels, and the alert now
> indicates an x-position of 380px! ...
21 matches
Mail list logo