I'm not sure how to respond within a thread so apologies for that. I want to
thank Tim Snadden and Bobby Jack for your help. I feel foolish that I missed
that. Tim I tried your most simplified code but wasn't able to make it work.
I'm referring to this: #photonav a:hover { background-position: 0 -
On 10/07/2009, at 3:59 PM, Tim Snadden wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2009, at 3:44 PM, MEM wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, there is still a lot of people that uses FF2 on this
>> side of
>> Atlantic. Can I have help on solving that issue?
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/
>
On 10/07/2009, at 3:44 PM, MEM wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, there is still a lot of people that uses FF2 on this
> side of
> Atlantic. Can I have help on solving that issue?
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/
> 20090605
> SeaMonkey/1.1.17
> Doesn't display proper
> if you want to just forget FF/2x; and, ride with a broken page in
> SeaMonkey and Camino until such time as they catch-up?
The site is far away from been launch. And SeaMonkey is absolutely
inexistent on this side.
But the fact that affects also Firefox 2 - bugs me.
> The correction for FF2x,
On 10/07/2009, at 11:25 AM, Tim Snadden wrote:
>
> #photonav li.dmitri a:hover {
> background-position: 0 -217px;
> }
Even better would be one rule for them all.
#photonav a:hover { background-position: 0 -217px; }
__
css-discu
On 10/07/2009, at 11:01 AM, Sara Ullman wrote:
> Greetings CSS enthusiasts,
>
> I am struggling with some problems with a site I am building for a
> friend. I
> found some instructions for doing rollover button navigation using
> images
> that have the normal, off state plus the hover state c
At 7/9/2009 03:23 PM, Greg Wilker wrote:
>I just noticed that the top nav "tabs" are distorted on my laptop with IE8.
>
>They work fine on my desktop with a widescreen monitor and they are working
>fine in FF of the laptop.
>
>http://www.achildsdream.com/htn/design3/index.html
>
>Anyone know what m
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Sara Ullman wrote:
> Unfortunately, in my case the image is disappearing entirely
> rather than showing the lower part of it on mouseover.
An easy one, for a change :) Your :hover images are referenced in an 'images'
directory; looks like this should be 'pics'. Everything
Greetings CSS enthusiasts,
I am struggling with some problems with a site I am building for a friend. I
found some instructions for doing rollover button navigation using images
that have the normal, off state plus the hover state combined in one
graphic. The lower half of the graphic is supposed
Greg Wilker wrote:
> I just noticed that the top nav "tabs" are distorted on my laptop with IE8.
>
> They work fine on my desktop with a widescreen monitor and they are working
> fine in FF of the laptop.
>
> http://www.achildsdream.com/htn/design3/index.html
>
> Anyone know what might be happenin
I just noticed that the top nav "tabs" are distorted on my laptop with IE8.
They work fine on my desktop with a widescreen monitor and they are working
fine in FF of the laptop.
http://www.achildsdream.com/htn/design3/index.html
Anyone know what might be happening?
(They are dropping "off", or
>
>
>> Check your page in SeaMonkey/1.1.17.
>>
> No I get the same symptoms on Firefox 2.
>
> So the problem is that, on SeaMonkey 1.1.17,
The problem is in FF/2x, SeaMonkey, and also Camino.
> I'm unable to contain the float
> ? Should I apply a clear fix method, or a ove
> Actually, you're doing quite well,
Thanks.
> regardless of your personal choice
> for font-family :-)
I see...
http://virtuelvis.com/archives/2004/01/avoid-verdana
Well, if Unix distros don't have it by default.
I must declare on the CSS Verdana alternatives.
However, doing that, will caus
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
> what's the point?see http://www.jquery.com
> and you won't need a class anymore ^^/
>
> 2009/7/9 MEM
>
>>> These will not work in IE6 either. Your "safest" route is probably to
>>> follow
>>> Brian's suggestion and define a class that you can apply.
>> No worries,
> I didn't know that we should only use one h1 per page.
> Why is that ?
It's not so much a rule as a convention. H1 is a top-level heading, and the
theory goes that there should only be one top, and thus one top-level heading.
Recently, I've decided that that logic isn't necessarily true. On
>It's not so much a rule as a convention. H1 is a top-level heading, and
the theory goes that
>there should only be one top, and thus one top-level heading.
...
> We all agree that markup should be semantic, but sometimes that's
> somewhat subjective.
Despite some web creators believes, isn't su
MEM wrote:
> Hello again list,
>
> We always can do better and better, this is my second css layout, so I know
> it's mediocre, anyway:
>
Actually, you're doing quite well, regardless of your personal choice
for font-family :-) . My second CSS layout was exactly like my first
CSS layout: u
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http:/
> To create spacing between a
> heading and
> a paragraph, it is normally best to use margin, because one day you
> might
> want to set background color for the heading, and then it would extend
> to
> the padding.
Thanks a lot, precious information!
> > As the discussion has shown, the practic
---[snip]---
In short, there are many differences between browsers with respect
how they display html. If you don't like the size of a disc displayed
in one browser as compared to another, then you have two choices: 1)
live with it; 2) or browser sniff and change the code accordingly.
However
Hi Tedd,
No harm done. :-) Thanks for confirming that the browsers each have
their own way of rendering bullets.
In the end, I did "browser-sniff" using an IE8 conditional statement
and modifying the CSS until that bullet was close in size to the other
browser's rendering. IE8 appears to render
> As the discussion has shown, the practical way is to use a
> class. On the other hand, normally a page should have one h1
> element (one highest-level
> heading) only, so I don't quite see why you can't just use
> the selector h1.
That is true. I don't usually have more than a single on a pa
Hello again list,
We always can do better and better, this is my second css layout, so I know
it's mediocre, anyway:
By having a look, and without changing the structure, here:
http://www.cantinho.org/pt/cantinho-site/layout9_ups_6.html
Knowing that it will never be perfect, what optimizations d
At 5:50 PM -0400 7/7/09, tedd wrote:
>At 5:00 PM -0400 7/7/09, Stephen Tang wrote:
>>Hi,
>>I have a site that was using list-style-type: disc for a list bullet.
>>The QA team noted that in IE8, the list bullets were smaller than in
>>IE7 or Firefox. All three browsers were accessing the same CSS
>
MEM wrote:
> All h1 that are followed by a p will have a padding-bottom of X.
>
> Is this possible?
As the discussion has shown, the practical way is to use a class. On the
other hand, normally a page should have one h1 element (one highest-level
heading) only, so I don't quite see why you can'
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Akins"
Subject: Re: [css-d] nav improvements?
> But, like I said, the navigation on the page now looks completely
> different than what I remember two days ago. Looks fine in my Firefox
> on the Mac.
Yes, the client scratched the concept and I did a
2009/7/9 Gabriele Romanato :
> what's the point?see http://www.jquery.com
> and you won't need a class anymore ^^/
>
Oh dear :-(
It's bad enough that every single JavaScript question on
StackOverflow.com gets answered with "use jQuery" (even when it's
wildly inappropriate or has been excluded
> what's the point?see http://www.jquery.com and you won't need
> a class anymore ^^/
The point, in the original question, was to get this *basic* display aspect
handled without resorting to scripting tactics.
Rob Emenecker @ Hairy Dog Digital
www.hairydo
>what's the point?
>see http://www.jquery.com
>and you won't need a class anymore ^^/
And so I asked: "How can I clean this little dot on my car left mirror";
And so they reply: "Here, take this Airplane - dot free!";
;) Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately, learning a framework it's out of rea
what's the point?see http://www.jquery.com
and you won't need a class anymore ^^/
2009/7/9 MEM
> > These will not work in IE6 either. Your "safest" route is probably to
> > follow
> > Brian's suggestion and define a class that you can apply.
>
> No worries, I'm using a class. :)
> Thanks for
> These will not work in IE6 either. Your "safest" route is probably to
> follow
> Brian's suggestion and define a class that you can apply.
No worries, I'm using a class. :)
Thanks for the suggestions.
Regards,
Márcio
__
css-di
> Anyway, I now know another concept on css: Adjacent Sibling
> Selector. And I believe there is a Child and a Parent selector too.
>
> I will investigate when the need arrive.
These will not work in IE6 either. Your "safest" route is probably to follow
Brian's suggestion and define a class that
Ingo Chao wrote:
> How would a generic media types string look like for the visual media
> group in CSS2.1?
>
> @media screen, projection, handheld
> is this correct?
'tv' gets the "fit to width" treatment for medium resolution devices by
Opera, and some 'screen' layouts - like mine - simply d
Thank you for your answers.
How would a generic media types string look like for the visual media
group in CSS2.1?
@media screen, projection, handheld
assuming that
- 'tty'-capable-devices would need a very special style sheet, if
there are such devices at all (?)
- 'tv' is not needed because MS
34 matches
Mail list logo
