Re: [css-d] stand-down

David Butler wrote: > On 7/29/2009 9:58 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: > >>> I can still get a blank page. I did notice that if I go to the >>> previous page (<-) and then forward to the page (->) that was blank, >>> it displays normal. This may have something to do with re-flow

Re: [css-d] Styling a definition list

On 30/07/2009, at 3:45 AM, Andy Stevens wrote: > Hi, > > I have a page with an existing unordered list > > > (more or less) that I reckon, from a semantic viewpoint, ought really > to be a definition list. So as a first step I swapped it for > > In these terms, > > 'content' means the stuff you

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On 7/29/2009 9:58 PM, David Laakso wrote: Alan Gresley wrote: >> I can still get a blank page. I did notice that if I go to the >> previous page (<-) and then forward to the page (->) that was blank, >> it displays normal. This may have something to do with re-flow when >> the images starts to d

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Alan Gresley wrote: > >> >> html >> >> >> css >> > > > David, > > I can still get a blank page. I did notice that if I go to the > previous page (<-) and then forward to the page (->) that was blank, > i

Re: [css-d] Styling a definition list

Andy Stevens wrote: > I have a page with an existing unordered list I would keep it that way. > (more or less) that I reckon, from a semantic viewpoint, ought really > to be a definition list. I tend to agree, but what you really benefit from changing the markup, presentationally or otherwise?

Re: [css-d] adding css to js, or the miserable 9 pixels

> Sandy Feldman wrote: > >> hey all, >> >> I hope you can help. >> >> I have a page which has a little javascript which rotates banner >> images. When I first added this js, the banner images slipped down >> 9px, showing a white gap on the top. After much trial and error, I >> added some css t

Re: [css-d] sticky footer up a little too high

On 31/07/2009, at 1:48 AM, Debbie Campbell wrote: > My sticky footer is not sticking to the bottom of my browser window: > >> http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/getborn/ Firstly your IE stylesheet is being served to all browsers. That's not the cause of this problem but it will cause you

[css-d] Fwd: adding css to js, or the miserable 9 pixels

-- Forwarded message -- From: Gabriele Romanato Date: 2009/7/30 Subject: Re: [css-d] adding css to js, or the miserable 9 pixels To: sa...@sandyfeldman.com The JS code provided is really ugly. Using write() is the worst approach, because the img is injected while the page is stil

[css-d] adding css to js, or the miserable 9 pixels

hey all, I hope you can help. I have a page which has a little javascript which rotates banner images. When I first added this js, the banner images slipped down 9px, showing a white gap on the top. After much trial and error, I added some css to the js in the header, and it looks hunky dory i

Re: [css-d] phones using handheld media type

Jeremy Weiss ink wired: > Does anyone have a link to a site that > lists which phones typically make use > of the style sheet specified for handhelds? Try the State of California's list: http://www.webtools.ca.gov/Web_Development/Designing_a_Website/Mobile_Devices.asp Hope that helps. -- I

Re: [css-d] Remaining height design: IE shows an horizontal scrollbar :: ed

Alan Gresley wrote: > Olivier Sannier wrote: > [...] > >> Thanks, this actually is the only thing of the two you proposed that has >> any effect. >> However, the first one got me thinking and I came up with this: >> >> *:first-child+html .innerContents >> { >> width: 98%; >> } >> >> .resizabl

[css-d] phones using handheld media type

Does anyone have a link to a site that lists which phones typically make use of the style sheet specified for handhelds? I've been told that some of the newer phones were just using the screen styles but I'm not able to find anything to confirm that. Thanks, Jeremy ___

Re: [css-d] Timing with css?

> > On 29/07/2009, at 10:40 PM, Andzia wrote: >> >>> Hello, I have this website almost finished: >>> http://klikerlab.pl/ >>> and I had an idea, that maybe I could make it more active, by >>> changing the >>> image to the left, each day. Can it be done with css? For example, >>> that the >

[css-d] sticky footer up a little too high

My sticky footer is not sticking to the bottom of my browser window: > http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/getborn/ I'm using this method: > http://www.cssstickyfooter.com/ Can anyone tell me what I'm doing incorrectly? -- Debbie Campbell www.redkitecreative.com __

Re: [css-d] Background images not appearing in IE7

Ellen Heitman wrote: > Thanks, that is very encouraging to hear. I've thought about your > email and have decided to try to eliminate the big background images > without changing the look too much. Thanks again. Set your own pace. You'll do just fine. No question about it. Good-bye, Westmore

Re: [css-d] creating for less than ie 8

Murgolo, James wrote: > I have a site that looks fine everywhere but less than IE 8 (including IE 8 > legacy mode). How do I get at that css so I can create a conditional mode > for that? > > Thanks, > James Murgolo > > "Getting at it" is easy enough. Knowing how to fix-it can be a little d

[css-d] Site check imprimerie-salfati.fr

Hi : Thanks in advance for all those who can or will take a few moments to see how it works in yours browsers. I'm thinking too to redesign the whole site (well, its not a great site, only a few dynamic pages with a CMS system, SPIP) using Tripoli http://devkick.com/lab/tripoli/ Has someone e

Re: [css-d] Timing with css?

Tim Snadden wrote: > On 29/07/2009, at 10:40 PM, Andzia wrote: > >> Hello, I have this website almost finished: >> http://klikerlab.pl/ >> and I had an idea, that maybe I could make it more active, by >> changing the >> image to the left, each day. Can it be done with css? For example, >> that

Re: [css-d] Styling a definition list

On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Andy Stevens wrote: > I have a page with an existing unordered list > > In these terms, > > 'content' means the stuff you are looking at on > this Site. > 'you', 'your' and > 'yours' means you, the idiots accessing this > Site. > 'we', 'us' and > 'our' means Big Cor

Re: [css-d] stand-down

David Laakso wrote: > Last call :-) : > > Still no luck. Quirksmode, this time. Simple layout. Unresolved problem > in IE/6. Clicking digits will sometimes cause a completely blank screen. > > Anyone? > > html > > > css >