Re: [css-d] How to get window to crop image?

2009/8/11 Lalena : > Hi guys, > I guess I could just crop the image and make it 100%, but I would be > "settling," I think, because based on what the current version is > doing, I'm pretty sure I would see a little of my black background on > either side. It won't really look like it continues beyo

[css-d] Can't get rid of blue links

Good morning (or night) people, I have some links here that are blue, but I can't figure out why they are this color and need help seeing what's invoking this color. I looked at every color but didn't find the answer. The links ought to be orange-whitish or green. http://bit.ly/ObnV3 Thanks a

Re: [css-d] Can't get rid of blue links

--- On Wed, 8/12/09, Kim Brooks Wei wrote: > I have some links here that are blue, but I can't figure > out why they are this color. Do you mean the links in your footer? They're not your specified colour because you're applying that colour to links in .narrowcolumn, which is separate from the

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Alan Gresley wrote >1. The 96px and 72pt boxes are the same size with a 96 DPI setting for >the monitor. > A point is 1/72 of an inch. Screen dpi's only purpose is to translate a measurement in inches to pixels. pixels = inches * screen dpi It's as simple as that. Whenever

[css-d] Fix for chrome browser

Hi All, This is general question , For IE , if we want to write an fix means , then we use something like _height:200px; For chrome , how to write an fix , Can some one tell with few example , Also for FF , IE-8 , Thanks Bharani

[css-d] OPTIONS of a select box overlapping a DIV overlay

Hey all, I'm well aware of the IE6-specifc problem regarding SELECT-boxes showing through a overlay div, and its usual fix (putting an iFrame with certain properties right under the overlay div), but I've just come across something new, related to this. Why I've never seen this before, I don't

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

> A point is 1/72 of an inch. Screen dpi's only purpose is to > translate a measurement in inches to pixels. I also wanted to make one other point. It's been said directly and indirectly, but maybe this explanation (and analogy) may help. Consider looking at a road map. There is a scale on the m

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

> >My question to you is why a box of 100px equals a inch > measured by a > >ruler and not what I expected 96px? > > > Don't understand the statement. I'll take a stab at this one... PPI/DPI is not an accurate measure of PHYSICAL dimensions on a monitor due to the PHYSICAL size of the monitor.

Re: [css-d] Fix for chrome browser

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM, bharani kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > This is general question , > > For IE , if we want to write an fix means , then we use something like > _height:200px; > > For chrome , how to write an fix , Can some one tell with few example , > > Also for FF , IE-8 , height:20

Re: [css-d] Fix for chrome browser

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, bharani kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > This is general question , > > For IE , if we want to write an fix means , then we use something like > _height:200px; > > For chrome , how to write an fix , Can some one tell with few example , > > Also for FF , IE-8 , http://www

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

> >My question to you is why a box of 100px equals a inch > measured by a > >ruler and not what I expected 96px? > > > Don't understand the statement. I'll take a stab at this one... PPI/DPI is not an accurate measure of PHYSICAL dimensions on a monitor due to the PHYSICAL size of the monitor

Re: [css-d] Fix for chrome browser

divya manian wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, bharani > kumar wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This is general question , >> >> For IE , if we want to write an fix means , then we use something >> like _height:200px; >> >> For chrome , how to write an fix , Can some one tell with few >> examp

[css-d] first-child and + selector issues

I'm having a lot of trouble getting a couple of lines of css to work in IE8. It works in Firefox but not IE8. Any ideas why? Is it the doctype? IE8 bug? Some error I've overlooked? Here's the site: http://tinyurl.com/lo468u Here's the css for this: ..boxes

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Rob Emenecker wrote >> >My question to you is why a box of 100px equals a inch >> measured by a >> >ruler and not what I expected 96px? >> > >> Don't understand the statement. > >I'll take a stab at this one... > I didn't make clear what I meant when I said "I don't understan

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

On 2009/08/13 10:59 (GMT+1200) Richard Mason composed: > ... On paper inches are physical inches. On a screen inches are > logical inches. Logical inches and physical inches are not the same > thing as I explain here: > http://www.emdpi.com/screendpi.html Your second and third sentences need a

Re: [css-d] first-child and + selector issues

On 13/08/2009, at 9:24 AM, Vincent Pollard wrote: > I'm having a lot of trouble getting a couple of lines of css to work > in > IE8. > > It works in Firefox but not IE8. Any ideas why? Is it the doctype? IE8 > bug? Some error I've overlooked? > > > > Here's the site: http://tinyurl.com/lo468u <

Re: [css-d] Fix for chrome browser

I find some one using height:120px; !important for IE fix Am used this fix , but no positive output , Can u tell me , its really works or not On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Christian Montoya wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM, bharani > kumar wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This is gen

Re: [css-d] Fix for chrome browser

On 13/08/2009, at 3:02 PM, bharani kumar wrote: > I find some one using > > height:120px; !important for IE fix > > > Am used this fix , but no positive output , > > Can u tell me , its really works or not Try putting !important before the semi-colon. I would suggest that 'important' shoul

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Felix Miata wrote >On 2009/08/13 10:59 (GMT+1200) Richard Mason composed: > >> ... On paper inches are physical inches. On a screen inches are >> logical inches. Logical inches and physical inches are not the same >> thing as I explain here: >> http://www.emdpi.com/screendpi.h

Re: [css-d] Screen resolution?

On 2009/08/13 16:36 (GMT+1200) Richard Mason composed: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Felix Miata wrote >>On 2009/08/13 10:59 (GMT+1200) Richard Mason composed: >>> ... On paper inches are physical inches. On a screen inches are >>> logical inches. Logical inches and physical inches are not the same >>>